Skip to main content

Table 6 Shoot biomass improvement (%) of the different BE treatments relative to the un-inoculated control (BE0)

From: Potential of three microbial bio-effectors to promote maize growth and nutrient acquisition from alternative phosphorous fertilizers in contrasting soils

 

Trianum-P (BE1)

Proradix (BE2)

Rhizovital (BE3)

Overall BE effect

(across all treatments)

7.5%

5.2%

6.0%

 Number of observations

50

87

78

BE effect in the different soils (across all fertilizers types)

 Buus (Switzerland)

2.7%ba

0.4%ba

8%aa

 Castel (Italy)

12.3%aa

7.8%ba

6.7%aa

 Vörden (Germany)

Not measured

3.4%aba

3.6%ba

 Taastrup (Denmark)

Not measured

17.0%aa

Not measured

BE effect with the different fertilizer types (across all soils)b

 No fertilizer added

10.8%aa

−1.2%ba

−11.5% ba

 Organic fertilizer

6.9%aa

14.0%a a

13.0% a a

 Inorganic fertilizer

6.4%aa

1.5%ba

7.3% aa

ANOVA on the effect of soil, fertilizer type and their interaction

 Soil (p value)

0.0002 (df = 1)

0.0070 (df = 3)

0.0054 (df = 2)

 Fertilizer type (p-value)

ns (df = 2)

<0.0001 (df = 2)

<0.0001 (df = 2)

 Soil x fertilizer type (p-value)

<0.0001 (df = 2)

<0.0001 (df = 6)

<0.0001 (df = 4)

  1. df means degree of freedom
  2. See “Methods” section for description of the calculations
  3. aLevels not connected by the same letter are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test P < 0.05)
  4. bUnderlined combinations of BE and P fertilizer type indicate when BE addition significantly improved shoot biomass as compared to the un-inoculated control with the same fertilizer type (t-test with P < 0.05)