Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the main plastic and bioplastics waste management operations (P, plastics; B, bioplastic)

From: The treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) as a possible source of micro- and nano-plastics and bioplastics in agroecosystems: a review

End-of-life option

Suitable for

Advantages

Disadvantages

Refs.

Landfilling and Incineration

P

Economically sound

Volume minimization

Rapid disposal

Minimum land requirement

Technology not required

Contaminated and toxic material can be treated

Electricity generation

Environmental problems, such as air, soil and water pollution

Shortens the lifespan of the plastics

Lots of energy required

Gases released as a byproduct can be dangerous and their exposure to living beings may result in breathing disorders

Generation of toxic leachate of hazardous nature

Disposal in landfills results in deterioration of land and increase the risk of consumption of plastics by animals

[54, 57,58,59,60]

Mechanical Recycling

P > B

Same material can be recycled up to 7 times before it degrades to the point that mechanical recycling is not an option anymore

Needs sorting and labor intensive: the resins must also be separated, and single-polymer waste stream is needed to optimum efficiency

Causes material and quality loss

Contaminated plastics cannot be treated

Low efficiency, recycled materials are downgraded

It occurs at about 200–300 °C resulting in emission of toxic gases

[59, 61, 62]

Chemical or Feedstock Recycling

B > P

Recycled material quality is higher than mechanical recycling option as polymers broken into monomers

Mixed and contaminated material can be used without sorting, thus offers a potential for household wastes and bioplastics

Economic feasibility needs to be assessed

Some technologies are still being development, and some have high energy use, costs, and technology demand

[63,64,65]