Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of metal nano-particles as growth promoters and fungi inhibitors for cereal crops

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 9, Article number: 12 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nano-particles of metals can be routinely synthesized. The cereal seeds treatment with the particles can improve early growth and crop production. Moreover, the treatment is robust and economical.

Methods

Metal (Fe0, Cu0, Co0), zinc oxide (ZnO) and chitosan-stabilized silver nano-particles were synthesized and applied to cereal seeds. The germination rate, early plant development and inhibition effects on pathogenic fungi were quantified.

Results

It was found that all nano-particles had a positive effect on the development of healthy cereal seedlings. In particular, the length of the above-ground part of the seedlings was increased by 8–22%. The highest inhibition effect was observed on Helminthosporium teres with the application of Co0 and chitosan-Ag. Pre-sowing treatment with metal nano-particles reduced the number of infected grains by two times for wheat and 3.6 times for barley. The application also increases the chlorophylls and carotenoids in both uninfected and infected seedlings.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated a robust application of nano-particles in improving cereal production.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Food crops, such as wheat, rice, maize, barley, etc., are vital for the human population. With increasing population and limited arable land, increasing crop yield remains a priority for many countries. Nanotechnology is one of the latest technological advances of the twenty-first century, which is considered a critical improvement of crop productivity [1]. While nanotechnology has been successfully employed in materials engineering, the potential application in agriculture has not been realized [2, 3]. The small size of the nano-particles allows them to pass through biological membranes, accumulate in the internal environment, integrate into proteins and, subsequently, change biological functions. The range of tested nanomaterials in the literature is extensive [4, 5]. Many studies have corroborated the effect of metal nano-particles on plant growth and disease resistance [6]. However, the mechanism of the biological action of nano-metals remained poorly understood. The particles can be applied at different stages of crop development [7]. However, applying particles to the soaking solution prior to germination requires a small metal content and does not affect soil conditions [8].

The enhanced crop growth was evidenced with silver [9, 10], copper [11, 12], silicon [13] and iron [14] nano-particles. In addition to zero-valent metal particles, metal oxide particles, such as zinc oxide [15] and copper oxide [16], were also applied. The metal particles, such as iron, cobalt and copper, can release electrons upon dissolving into the water due to the high reduction potential. It is interesting to notice the selective impact of these metals. For instance, Cu0 and Co0 have promoted the plant body better than Fe0 during the germination stage of maize seeds in the tropical climate [12].

Grains are a source of preservation of many pathogens, as they are rich in proteins, minerals and nutrients. Pathogens that persist in the seed lead to a decrease in seed germination, damage to the root system, and seedlings' death. In addition, sowing with infected grains can spread diseases to vegetating plants and thus create an infection in the field. Therefore, seed treatment is a necessary procedure for growing grain crops. A previous study has found that copper oxide particles can suppress infection in soybean [17]. Among the reported fungi, the saprotrophic mould fungi Penicillium, Aspergillus, Mucor, Rhizopus, Cladosporium are dominant for cereal crops [18]. All of them are ordinary representatives of the surface microflora of grains. In addition, fungi of the genera Bipolaris, Alternaria, Fusarium were commonly found [19]. For barley, Helminthosporium teres is the most well-known pathogenic fungi and has been investigated over a century [20].

It is expected that the impact of metal nano-particles can vary with plants and climate. This study investigates the effect of metal nano-particles in pre-sowing treatment on the early growth of cereal crops in a temperate climate. Three metal nano-particles (Fe0, Cu0, Co0) were synthesized [12] and used in the study. In addition to these zero-valent metals, stable metal oxide (ZnO) and organic-stabilized Ag particles were synthesized and employed. The germination and morphometric parameters at the early stages of wheat and barley grains were experimentally monitored. The extent of inhibition the particles on phytopathogenic fungi growth was also quantified. The study aims to clarify the influence and optimal conditions of metal nano-particles on cereal crops.

Methods and materials

Preparation and characterization of nano-particles

Fe(NO3)3, Co(NO3)2, Cu(NO3)2 were used as precursors for precipitating processes with NaOH solution. Three metals, iron, copper and cobalt, were synthesized via the reduction method at an elevated temperature. The optimal temperature for the particles was selected from the previous experiments: 400 °C for Fe and Cu, and 300 °C for Co. The reaction time was 90 min with a hydrogen flow rate of 350 ml/min. The final particle size was between 30 and 70 nm. The synthesized metal particles were immediately stored in double-side vacuum bags. A previous study has shown that these particles remain in a zero-valent state for up to 12 months. The phase structure of as-prepared nanoparticles was verified by X-ray diffraction and SEM as described before [12]. The percentages of the oxidized and metallic elements were calculated from XRF. The purity of the metallic content was greater than 99%.

For silver particle synthesis, the aqueous solution method was used [21]. The reaction of nanosilver formation was taking place in a homogeneous solution of AgNO3 with β-chitosan as a stabilizer and permanent stirring at ambient temperature while the reducing agent (NaBH4) was being added successively drop by drop. Chemical reagents were from Merck and Sigma Aldrich. β-chitosan was provided by the Institute of Chemicals (Vietnam). Stock solutions were prepared using bi-distilled water. For chitosan-Ag particles, FE-SEM was used to confirm the particles (Additional file 1: Fig. S4 and S5).

Plant material and pre-sowing treatment

The selected objects were seeds of spring wheat Triticum aestivum L. and spring barley Hordeum vulgare L. Spring wheat variety "Sudarynya" is a medium-ripe variety of Belarusian selection. Spring barley variety "Magutny", an early ripe variety of Belarusian barley, was selected. Both grains were used with permission from the commercial supplier ("Eвpo-Ceмeнa", Belarus). The study complies with the relevant national and international guidelines and legislation. Non-valence metal nano-particles (Feo, Cuo, Coo) and nano-zinc oxide (ZnO) are dispersed into double-distilled water and ultrasonically vibrated to create a suspension solution. The optimal ultrasonic time of 20 min was used [12]. Since chitosan-Ag was stable in an aqueous solution, it was used directly without sonication. The concentration of nano-particles used in the experiments was 0.3–0.5 mg/kg grain for Fe, Cu, Co, ZnO nano-particles and 15–60 mg/kg grain for Ag nano-particles.

Three experimental studies evaluated the effectiveness of particles. First, the germination and pathogen control were tested in the laboratory. Second, the fungicidal activities were tested by mixing the particles with a nutrient medium. Third, the impact of the particles on plant growth and production was evaluated by growing crops in the plant nursery. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel by calculating the arithmetic mean and standard deviation. The Shapiro–Wilk test [22] was used to assess the normality of distribution. The reliability of the sample differences with a normal distribution was tested with the parametric Student's t-test. Significance was tested at a probability level of 95% or 99%.

Germination and pathogen control

Sowing characteristics of seed were determined according to the current Standards of the Republic of Belarus. The seeds were soaked in with freshly prepared solutions of particles for 8–10 h. The control samples were soaked in double-distilled water. Subsequently, they were dried and germinated in Petri dishes on filter paper moistened with distilled water in a thermostat at 21 °C. For each sample, 100 seeds were selected and replicated four times. Germination energy and germination rate were determined on the 3rd and the 7th day, respectively. On the 7th day, the seedling length, the main root length, and their mass were also quantified.

Pathogen infestation of cereal seeds was determined in laboratory conditions by germinating seeds on nutrient agar. The chemical composition of agar was the same as the growing culture (described below). A mycelia block (3 mm in diameter) of the pathogen at the actively growing edge of the culture was placed in the centre of a 5-cm-diameter Petri dish. Each treatment was repeated three times, with an equal number of seeds, on three different dishes. Diseases caused by fungi on germinated and non-germinated grains were manifested in the form of spots of various shapes and colours, mycelium plaque, deformation or dead parts of seedlings. Seed contamination with phytopathogenic fungi was expressed as a percentage of infected seeds to the total amount in the sample. In this experiments, the nanomaterial concentrations in the agar were the same as the concentration in the soaking solution, as mentioned above.

A more detailed investigation of seedlings infection was conducted with barley and the phytopathogenic fungus Helminthosporium teres. The seeds were infected with spores of Helminthosporium teres at the age of 10 days. On the sixth day after infection, when the infection is visible, the content of photosynthetic pigments, lipid peroxidation products and water-soluble content from healthy and infected plant tissues were determined [23].

Fungicidal activities

Fungicidal inhibition of the five nano-particles was tested with three phytopathogenic fungi—Alternaria sp., Fusarium sp. and Helminthosporium teres. These three fungi groups were selected based on their relevance in cereal production [24]. The impact of metal nano-particles on the mycelium development of phytopathogenic fungi was tested on sterile nutrient aqueous solutions of nano-particles. The particle solution was prepared with double-distilled water at three different concentrations (Additional file 1: Table S1). Subsequently, lactose (at a concentration of 20 g/L) and urea (at a concentration of 1.2 g/L) were added as a source of carbohydrates and nitrogen, respectively. The vital minerals were also added: MgSO4 (0.5 g/L), KCl (0.5 g/L) and KH2PO4 (0.5 g/L). Agar was used as a solid thickener. The mixed solutions (in a volume of 15 ml) were poured into Petri dishes. The nutrients and minerals were mixed with double-distilled water at the same concentrations to prepare the control medium.

Sterilization was carried out with steam at 1 atmosphere for 1 h [25]. After solidifying the medium, agar blocks (2 mm in diameter) with the mycelium of the studied fungi were placed in the centre of the dishes. Fungal cultivation was carried out at 25 ± 1 °C. The diameter of the grown colonies was measured on the 10th day. The inhibition of colony growth was quantified as the ratio of the diameter of fungi mycelium between the nanoparticles-added media and control medium.

Crop productivity

For crop productivity analysis, plants were grown on standard growing plots for each variant in triplicate, at the Institute of Experimental Botany (National Academy of Science, Belarus). The growing season lasted 80 and 90 days for barley and wheat, respectively. The effect of metal nanoparticles on the formation of grain crop productivity was investigated by quantifying the critical indicators of the plant, ears and grains. The crop structure was determined in the phase of wax ripeness in ten plants of each group in four replicates. The main elements of the crop structure were: (i) the height of the plant; (ii) the quantity of productive and unproductive stems; (iii) the mass of straw and ears from 10 plants; (iv) the weight and the number of grains in the ears; (v) the mass of 1000 grains.

Results and discussion

The influence of nano-metals on the growth of the cereal seedlings

The application of metal nano-particles in pre-sowing treatment led to a positive change in morphometric parameters for both wheat and barley (Fig. 1). Wheat seedlings were more sensitive to treatments. Except for chitosan-Ag, the concentration of the four nano-particles was between 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg of grains. The aqueous concentration of chitosan-Ag was between 15 and 60 mg/kg, as detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The application of Cu0, Fe0 and Co0 increased the length of the above-ground part of the seedlings in all concentrations. The range increment is between 14 and 22%. The most significant improvement of wheat seedling length was observed with Fe0 at 0.4 mg/kg. This improvement was 22% and was statistically significant at a 1% level. ZnO and chitosan-Ag particles had a weaker effect, only from 6 to 10%. The particles did not produce significant improvement for barley (Fig. 1a and b). The height of the above-ground part of barley seedlings increased by 6–9% compared to the control sample (healthy seeds but untreated with any metals).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of metal nano-particles on the primary growth of seedlings a length of seedlings, b length of roots (“ + ” indicates 95% statistically significant difference to the control sample, “○” indicates 99% statistically significant difference to the control sample)

Full size image

Notably, the decrease in germination energy and germination of Co0-treated grains did not cause further inhibition of plant growth. Under the influence of Co0 (concentration between 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg), wheat and barley showed an increase in the seedling length of 12–14% and 6–9%, respectively.

Antifungal properties of metal nano-particles

The study of fungitoxicity of metal nano-particles began with their direct impact on the growth of mycelium phytopathogenic fungi (Fusarium sp., Helminthosporium teres, Alternaria sp.), which cause root rotting, leaf spotting and ear disease.

Phytopathogenic fungus Helminthosporium teres showed the highest sensitivity to nano-preparation (demonstrated in Fig. 2). The inhibitory effects of nano-metals on the fungi colonies are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1. The exception was the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium sp., which proved to be resistant to metal nano-particles. The maximum inhibition effect was found when Helminthosporium teres was grown on a medium with cobalt and silver nano-particles. In these conditions, the diameter of the colonies decreased by 27–53% and 36–53%, respectively. Other nano-metals also inhibited the growth of the fungus, but not more than 36%. A statistically significant decrease in the development of the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria sp. was observed when using nano-particles of chitosan-Ag (at 15 and 30 mg/kg), Co0 (at 0.4 and 0.5 mg/kg), Cu0 and ZnO (both at 0.5 mg/kg). These nano-metals slowed pathogen development by 27–33% relative to the control sample (Additional file 1: Table S1). These reductions were statistically significant at a 5% level.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inhibition of mycelium growth of the phytopathogenic fungus Helminthosporium teres by the nano-particles Ag and Co

Full size image

As demonstrated in Fig. 3, the infection rate of untreated cereal grains was 44% for barley and 28% for wheat. Pre-sowing treatment of wheat grains with metal nano-particles in medium and high concentrations reduced the infection by 1.75–2 times. A more substantial suppression of phytopathogenic microflora was observed on barley. The number of infected grains decreased by 1.8–3.6 times in all experimental conditions. The highest reduction was obtained by silver particles. The exception was Fe0 nano-particles, which did not have a significant impact on the seed infection. Thus, a distinguishable impact of metal nano-particles on seed infection was revealed. Therefore, nano-metals did not directly influence fungal spores but activated the protective mechanisms of plant cells. It was noted that metal nano-particles were particularly effective against the three fungi Penicillium, Aspergillus and Mucor, with suppression rates between 20 and 25%.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of metal nano-particles on the development of mycelium of phytopathogenic fungi (10th day). (“ + ” indicates 95% statistically significant difference to the control sample, “○” indicates 99% statistically significant difference to the control sample)

Full size image

Influence of metal nano-particles on cell membranes and photosynthetic pigments

The barley/Helminthosporium teres was selected to investigate the impact of particles on cell membranes and photosynthetic pigments [26]. It was revealed that a pre-sowing treatment had a substantial effect on the lipid peroxidation products and water-soluble substances from plant tissues (Additional file 1: Table S2). Compared with untreated plants, the lipid peroxidation product was decreased by 10–40%, and water-soluble substances were decreased by 10–50%. It should be noted that low concentrations of nano-metals had a stronger impact on healthy plants. On the other hand, higher concentrations were more effective for infected seedlings. Amongst the particles, the most significant effects on the integrity of the cell walls were observed with zinc oxide and silver. The results are consistent with the anti-bacterial properties of silver particles [10].

Experimental results on the photosynthetic pigment complex [27] were also quantified (tabulated in Additional file 1: Table S3). For the uninfected barley plants, nanoparticles of Fe (0.25 mg/kg), Ag (0.5 mg/kg) and Cu (0.25 mg/kg) increased the content of total chlorophylls and carotenoids by 20% to 30%. In other cases, the number of photosynthetic pigments remained at the control level. During inoculation of barley seedlings with Helminthosporium teres spores, a decrease in the content of chlorophylls (23%) and carotenoids (20%) in plant material was observed. The metal treatment significantly diminished the impact of the infection. In the cases of Fe (at concentrations of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg); Cu (at 0.5 mg/kg); ZnO (at 0.5 mg/kg) and Ag (0.5 mg/kg), the metal treatment completely overcome the infection.

Influence of pre-treatment on the productivity and the crop structure indicators

The results of studies on the effect of pre-sowing treatment of grains on crop productivity were measured in terms of stem length, numbers of productive and unproductive stems on plants and mass of straw. The full results for wheat and barley are presented in Additional file 1: Tables S4 and S5, respectively. The studies revealed that the stem length of wheat plants was influenced only by pre-treatment with iron nanoparticles at a concentration of 0.50 mg/kg grains. At this treatment, the height of plants increased by 5 cm compared to the control sample. In other conditions, the differences with control values were statistically insignificant. It is also noted that iron nanoparticles increased the number of productive stems in wheat plants by 1.3 times.

In contrast, the most noticeable improvement was observed in barley in straw mass (Additional file 1: Table S5). However, only iron and cobalt nano-particles (at both 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) increased the straw mass. In contrast, the samples treated with Cu0 nanoparticles did not improve strawweight compared to the untreated plants.

Influences of pre-sowing treatment on the critical crop structure indicators are presented in Fig. 4. The experimental results showed an increase in the weight of ears from 10 plants by 1.2–1.4 times. The exception was the treatment of wheat grains with a high concentration of copper nanoparticles, where this indicator remained at the control level. However, it should be noted that the increase in ear mass from 10 wheat plants with the use of Cu nanoparticles in a concentration of 0.25 mg/kg of grains is solely due to an increase in the number of productive stems. In addition, an increase in the mass of the ear itself was revealed in other treatments. For example, with cobalt and iron nanoparticles, the mass of grains per ear increased by increasing the number of grains in the ear.

Fig. 4
figure 4figure 4

Influence of pre-sowing treatment on the crop structure indicators: a mass of ears from 10 plants; b average ear weight; c mass of grains per ear; d number of grains per ear, and e mass of 1000 grains. (“ + ” indicates 95% statistically significant difference to the control sample, “○” indicates 99% statistically significant difference to the control sample). Other crop indicators are in Additional file 1: Tables S4 and S5

Full size image

In comparison, the weight of 1000 grains remains practically unchanged in all variants and does not differ significantly from the control. Finally, it was noted that the pre-sowing treatment of barley grains with iron and cobalt nanoparticles at a concentration of 0.50 mg/kg of grains contributed to an increased weight of ears from 10 plants by 1.2–1.5 times (Fig. 4b). The increment was not attributed to the number of grains in the ear (Fig. 4d), but the grains size (Fig. 4e).

Conclusions

A moderate positive effect of seed pre-sowing treatment with aqueous dispersions of nano-particles zero-valence Fe0, Cu0, Co0, ZnO and chitosan-Ag solutions on the growth of cereal seedlings were observed. The impact varied with the particle concentration. At medium and high concentrations of nano-metals Fe0, Cu0, Co0, the length of the above-ground part of the wheat seedlings was increased by 14–22%. Nano-particles of ZnO and solution of chitosan-Ag had weaker, only from 6 to 10%. The impact on barley seedlings was weaker. The height of the above-ground part of barley seedlings increased by 6–9% compared to the control values. The application doses were very small, 0.5 mg/kg of grains. Most of the metal content is built up in the surface to the seedling shells and not the crop product as in the soil application [28].

A visible antifungal effect of metal nano-particles on phytopathogenic fungi was observed. The infection rate of untreated cereal grains was 44% for barley and 28% for wheat. Pre-sowing treatment of wheat grains with metal particles reduced the number of infected grains by 1.75–2 times. More potent suppression of the development of phytopathogenic microflora was observed on barley grains. The number of infected grains decreased by 1.8–3.6 times in all experimental conditions. The treatment also increased the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and inhibited membrane lipid peroxidation. The decreased contents of water-soluble substances from plant tissues indicate an adaptive-protective mechanism. The analysis of the crop structure showed that the pre-treatment of grains with nanoparticles had substantial effects on stems and grains. The most significant improvement was observed with Fe0 and Co0 nano-particles. These nano-metals increased the average mass of stems by 20–60% and ear mass by 20–50%.

For all studied materials, the application of Co0 nano-particles at 0.5 mg/kg produced the most significant improvement. The results can provide a promising economical and environmentally friendly pre-sowing treatment with ultra-low concentrations of metal nanoparticles.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hofmann T, Lowry GV, Ghoshal S, Tufenkji N, Brambilla D, Dutcher JR, et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat Food. 2020;1:416–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0110-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kah M, Tufenkji N, White JC. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:532–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0439-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Usman M, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Nawaz A, Cheema SA, ur Rehman H, et al. Nanotechnology in agriculture: current status, challenges and future opportunities. Sci Total Environ. 2020;721:137778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Achari GA, Kowshik M. Recent developments on nanotechnology in agriculture: plant mineral nutrition, health, and interactions with soil microflora. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66:8647–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A. Nanotechnology in agro-food: from field to plate. Food Res Int. 2015;69:381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Temsah YS, Joner EJ. Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environ Toxicol. 2012;27:42–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Deng C, Rawat S, Cota-Ruiz K, Medina-Velo I, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Evaluation of the effects of nanomaterials on rice (Oryza sativa L.) responses: underlining the benefits of nanotechnology for agricultural applications. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2021;1:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhagat Y, Gangadhara K, Rabinal C, Chaudhari G, Ugale P. Nanotechnology in agriculture: a review. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2015;9:737–47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khan J, Chandra J, Xalxo R, Korram J, Satnami ML, Keshavkant S. Amelioration of ageing associated alterations and oxidative inequity in seeds of cicer arietinum by silver nanoparticles. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10193-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, Farzaneh M, Ghassempour A. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. And its rhizosphere bacteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;88:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yasmeen F, Raja NI, Ilyas N, Komatsu S. Quantitative proteomic analysis of shoot in stress tolerant wheat varieties on copper nanoparticle exposure. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2018;36:326–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-018-1082-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoang SA, Nguyen LQ, Nguyen NH, Tran CQ, Nguyen D V., Le NT, et al. Metal nanoparticles as effective promotors for Maize production. Sci Rep 2019;9:13925. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50265-2

  13. Ahmad B, Khan MMA, Jaleel H, Shabbir A, Sadiq Y, Uddin M. Silicon nanoparticles mediated increase in glandular trichomes and regulation of photosynthetic and quality attributes in Mentha piperita L. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39:346–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09986-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HS, Ahn JY, Hwang KY, Kim ILK, Inseong H. Atmospherically stable nanoscale zero-valent iron particles formed under controlled air contact: characteristics and reactivity. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:1760–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Itroutwar PD, Govindaraju K, Tamilselvan S, Kannan M, Raja K, Subramanian KS. Seaweed-based biogenic ZnO nanoparticles for improving agro-morphological characteristics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39:717–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10012-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nair PMG, Chung IM. Changes in the Growth, redox status and expression of oxidative stress related genes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in response to copper oxide nanoparticle exposure. J Plant Growth Regul. 2015;34:350–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-014-9468-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma C, Borgatta J, Hudson BG, Tamijani AA, De La Torre-Roche R, Zuverza-Mena N, et al. Advanced material modulation of nutritional and phytohormone status alleviates damage from soybean sudden death syndrome. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020;15:1033–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00776-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yli-Mattila T. Detection of trichothecene-producing Fusarium species in cereals in northern Europe and Asia. Agron Res. 2011;9:521–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rabie CJ, Lübben A, Marais GJ, Jansen Van Vuuren H. Enumeration of fungi in barley. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997;35:117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Backes A, Guerriero G, Ait Barka E, Jacquard C. Pyrenophora teres: taxonomy, morphology, interaction with barley, and mode of control. Front Plant Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.614951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pillai ZS, Kamat PV. What Factors control the size and shape of silver nanoparticles in the citrate ion reduction method? J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:945–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp037018r.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seed of farm crops. Methods for determination of germinating ability [Семена сельскохозяйственных культур. Методы определения всхожести]. National Standards 12038-84 [ГОСТ 12038-84]. 1984.

  24. Soroka SV, Buga SF, Zhukova MI, Nemkovich AI, Uskevich LA, Radyna AA, et al. Main phytosanitary problems in Belarus and methods of their solution. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2001;34:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Семена сельскохозяйственных культур. Методы определения зараженности болезнями [Agricultural seeds. Methods for determination of disease infestation.] National Standards 12044-93 [ГОСТ 12044-93). 1993.

  26. Afanasev IA, Smashevskiy ND. The structure of the photosynthetic apparatus of the plant genus tamarix which grows in the Astrakhan region. Nat Sci. 2013;2:11–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. De Vos CHR, Schat H, Vooijs R, Ernst WHO. Copper-induced damage to the permeability barrier in roots of Silene cucubalus. J Plant Physiol. 1989;135:164–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Chen S, Deng C, Shi X, Cota-Ruiz K, White JC, et al. Metabolomic analysis reveals dose-dependent alteration of maize (Zea mays L.) metabolites and mineral nutrient profiles upon exposure to zerovalent iron nanoparticles. NanoImpact. 2021;23:100336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The studies were funded by projects coded QTBY02.02/19–20 of Vietnam Academy Science and Technology and BRFFR (№ B19VA-001) of Belarus's National academy of sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

    A. S. Hoang, H. H. Cong & D. K. Pham

  2. V.F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Science, Minsk, Belarus

    V. P. Shukanov, L. A. Karytsko, S. N. Poljanskaja, E. V. Melnikava & I. A. Mashkin

  3. Viet Tri University of Industry, Phu Tho, Vietnam

    T. H. Nguyen

  4. Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

    A. S. Hoang

  5. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    C. M. Phan

Authors
  1. A. S. Hoang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. H. Cong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. P. Shukanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. A. Karytsko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. N. Poljanskaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. V. Melnikava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. I. A. Mashkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. T. H. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. D. K. Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. M. Phan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CH, SH, KP, HN: synthesized the metal nano-particles. SP, KA, PN, MV: reagents and analytic tools, performed research and coordinated the field application and collected the data. SH, SP and CP: analysed the data and prepared the manuscript with inputs from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. S. Hoang or V. P. Shukanov.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

. SEM image (a) and XRD pattern (b) of Cu0 nanoparticles synthesized at 400°C. Figure S2. SEM image (a) and XRD pattern (b) of Fe0 nanoparticles synthesized at 400°C. Figure S3. SEM image of Co° nanoparticles with average size of 50 nm (a) and XRD pattern (b) of Co0 nanoparticles synthesized at 300°C. Figure S4. FE-SEM image (a) and size distribution (b) of Ag nano-particles. Figure S5. UV-Vis spectra of sample A500-C120 (AgNO3 500 ppm and chitosan 120 ppm). Table S1. The effect of metal nanoparticles on the development of mycelium of phytopathogenic fungi (10th day). Table S2. Effects of metal nanoparticles on barley plant cell membranes. Table S3. Effect of metal nanoparticles on photosynthetic pigments in barley seedlings. Table S4. Influence of pre-treatment of spring wheat seeds on the productivity indicators. Table S5. Influence of pre-treatment of barley seeds on the productivity indicators

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, A.S., Cong, H.H., Shukanov, V.P. et al. Evaluation of metal nano-particles as growth promoters and fungi inhibitors for cereal crops. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 9, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00277-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00277-w

Keywords