Skip to main content

Table 4 Influence of biostimulants on fruit yield and quality of ‘Yaghouti’ grapevine under WW and DS conditions

From: Biostimulant-induced drought tolerance in grapevine is associated with physiological and biochemical changes

Irrigation regimes

Biostimulants

Weight of 20 berries (g)

Yield vine−1 (kg)

TA (g L−1)

TSS (Brix)

WW

CON

42.32 ± 1.52 cd

9.50 ± 0.43 c

5.43 ± 0.20 b

16.73 ± 0.63 f

AA

61.56 ± 1.45 a

11.63 ± 0.35 a

4.66 ± 0.15 c

20.23 ± 0.34 cd

HA

52.23 ± 2.30 b

10.43 ± 0.40 b

4.11 ± 0.44 e

19.31 ± 0.16 de

FA

53.45 ± 2.08 b

10.76 ± 0.32 b

4.10 ± 0.10 e

19.37 ± 0.28 de

SE

55.41 ± 0.57 b

10.86 ± 0.32 b

4.04 ± 0.10 e

18.72 ± 1.80 e

DS

CON

24.00 ± 2.64 g

6.70 ± 0.34 f

5.75 ± 0.11 a

19.70 ± 0.52 de

AA

33.73 ± 3.56 f

7.63 ± 0.70 e

4.81 ± 0.17 c

21.20 ± 0.20 bc

HA

39.83 ± 0.76 de

8.10 ± 0.36 de

4.70 ± 0.41 c

21.41 ± 0.27 b

FA

38.33 ± 1.55 e

8.40 ± 0.52 de

4.46 ± 0.16 d

21.70 ± 0.20 ab

SE

45.00 ± 2.60 c

9.26 ± 0.37 c

4.10 ± 0.15 e

22.70 ± 0.34 a

Significance

    

Irrigation regime

**

*

*

**

Biostimulants

**

**

**

**

Irrigation regime × biostimulants

**

**

*

**

  1. Mean values followed by the similar letters within a column are not significantly different from each other at P ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test). * and ** are significant at P ≤ 0.05 and at P ≤ 0.01, respectively. Values are means of three replicates ± SD