Skip to main content

Table 1 Soil characteristics

From: Potential of three microbial bio-effectors to promote maize growth and nutrient acquisition from alternative phosphorous fertilizers in contrasting soils

Soil-ID

Geographic origin

Management

Soil type

Texture

Soil pH

C org

Phosphorus

Clay

Sand

Silt

(CaCl2)

 

CAL/DLd

(%)

(%)

(%)

 

(%)

(mg P kg−1)

1-Buusa

Buus

(Switzerland)

Rotation: Lay rotation

Fertilization: organic, low input

Site type: farmer field site

Loamy soil

29.9

3.90

66.2

6.6

2.64

6.5

2-Castela

Castel Volturno (Italy)

Rotation: Maize-clover

Fertilization: mineral, low input

Site type: farmer field site

Vertic Xerofluvent

36.5

19.0

44.5

7.3

1.34

19.2

3-Humpoleca

Humpolec

(Czech Republic)

Rotation: P-WW-SBc

Fertilization: mineral, low input

Site type: experimental station

Cambisol

Loamy sand

15.9

52.9

31.2

5.2

1.63

45.0/59.8

4-Lukaveca

Lukavec

(Czech Republic)

Rotation: long-term protection area around field experiment

Fertilization: none

Site type: experimental station

Cambisol

Loamy sand

14.0

56.0

30.0

5.4

1.5

48.0/49.8

5-Vördenb

Vörden

(Germany)

Rotation: before 2009 grazing area for wildlife – since 2009 field forage cultivation

Fertilization: low input (organic and mineral)

Site type: farmer field site

Cambisol

12.0

41.1

46.9

5.0

0.72

11.4/9.4

6-Taastrupa

Taastrup

(Denmark)

Rotation: Barley-barley

Fertilization: no P fertilizer since 1964

Site type: long-term field trial

Sandy loam

13.4

55.4

31.2

5.8

1.09

15.3/17.9

  1. aData were recorded on the pure soil
  2. bData were recorded on the 2:1 soil: sand mixture used in the pot experiments
  3. c P potato, WW winter wheat, SB spring barley
  4. dP measured after double lactate (DL) extraction is also given for soil with pH < 6 (exception for soil 3)