Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Spectroscopic analysis of mushrooms by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 9, Article number: 100 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mushrooms have always been considered an important source of food and biologically active compounds with several medicinal properties. In recent years, different methods were used to study the quality and chemical composition of mushrooms. Among these, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and FT-Raman spectroscopy techniques have been successfully applied to identify different mushroom species. However, the structural biomolecule components existing in the mycelium or in the fruiting bodies may produce strong fluorescence emission that overlaps the Raman radiation, thus avoiding their analyses by Raman. SERS spectroscopy is a powerful technique which uses metal nanoparticles (NPs) to enhance the Raman signal of molecules adsorbed on the NPs surface. In addition, SERS is able to quench the macromolecule florescence. In this work, we have employed silver nanoparticles in order to get mushroom fingerprints based on SERS as quick procedure to analyze and identify different chemical compounds from the fruiting bodies of six edible and/or medicinal mushrooms: Lentinula edodes, Ganoderma lucidum, Pleurotus cornucopiae, Pleurotus ostreatus, Tuber aestivum and Tuber magnatum.

Results

SERS analyses performed directly on fruiting body fragments produced characteristic spectra for each species. One group of mushrooms (L. edodes, G. lucidum, T. aestivum and T. magnatum) was dominated by the bands of nucleic acids; and the other one (P. cornucopiae and P. ostreatus), by the bands of pigments such as melanins; carotenoids; azafilones; polyketides; and flavonoids located in the cell wall. Additionally, bands corresponding to cell wall polysaccharides, particularly chitosan and 1,3-β D-glucan, were identified in the extracts of P. cornucopiae, P. ostreatus and L. edodes. No signal of cell wall polysaccharides was found in G. lucidum extract. Raman mapping of the analyzed samples was useful in tracking the spatial distribution of the marker bands. Moreover, the principal component analysis (PCA) carried out on the acquired SERS spectra, allows to discriminate the analyzed mushroom species.

Conclusions

The SERS technique has the ability to generate a strong Raman signal from mushroom fruiting bodies using Ag-NPs deposited directly on intact, untreated mushroom tissues. Using this methodology, commonly applied laboratory time-consuming methods can be avoided or bypassed as well as analysis time can be reduced.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Fungi are a kingdom of unicellular or multicellular eukaryotic organisms which has recently been estimated to include up 12 millions of species [1]. Most of them are free-living in soil or water as saprotroph; others establish parasitic or symbiotic relationships with plants or animals. Depending on their aspects, they can be empirically divided in yeasts, filamentous molds, and mushrooms. In particular, mushrooms are defined as the fungi that form a distinctive fruiting body which can be either hypogeous or epigeous, large enough to be seen with the naked eye and to be picked by hand [2, 3]. Mushrooms have always been considered an important source of food and biologically active compounds with several medicinal properties [4]. Traditionally, characterization of fungi has been based on phenotypic characteristics or molecular analysis. However, most of the described fungal species (about 70%) have not yet been sequenced [5]. All these issues reduce the authenticity of the data and the reliability of the analysis. In addition, another concern relates to the time required for analysis, which is both time-consuming and often very expensive.

In recent years, vibrational spectroscopy techniques allow a range of qualitative or quantitative information to be obtained, representing a new frontier for fungal identification [6], as well as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and FT-Raman techniques have been successfully applied to identify different fungal species (Boletus spp., Ganoderma spp., Agaricus bisporus (J.E. Lange) Imbach, Mucor rouxii (Calmette) Wehmer and Mortierella sp.) [7,8,9]. However, FT-Raman analysis of biological materials can produce a weak signal, which is often covered by the large fluorescence emitted by the sample after excitation [10]. Likewise, FT-IR analysis of biological materials can produce low-quality spectra due to different tissue hydration. As a result, this may lead to an information loss in the amide region caused by the broad adsorption of water molecules at around 1640 cm−1 [11].

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), thanks to the use of nanostructured metals (Au and Ag), allows to overcome the intrinsic weakness of Raman spectroscopy combining high molecular specificity with a high sensitivity [12, 13]. The signal enhancement strongly depends on the nanoparticles (NPs) optical properties (i.e., composition, size, and shape), the laser excitation characteristics, the nature of the molecule and its Raman cross-sections [14, 15]. When incident light interacts with the NPs, a localized electric field is generated producing a localized surface plasmonic resonance (LSPR) that allows a strong increase in the Raman scattering up to 1014 orders of magnitude compared to the normal Raman technique [16, 17]. Thus, only molecules adsorbed or located near the plasmonic substrate produce noticeable amplification of the Raman signal [18, 19]. Moreover, the maximum intensification of the signal occurs at the tips of protruding elements and, even more, in the interparticle nanoscale spaces called “hot spots” [20]. These “hot spots” result from plasmonic coupling between NPs and increase rapidly as the interparticle distance becomes shorter [21]. As a result of their efficacy the SERS-based metallic NPs have been used to characterize complex biological samples such as nucleic acids [22,23,24] and proteins [25,26,27] as well as for the study of different microorganisms, including fungi [28,29,30,31,32], yeasts [33], and plant pathogens [34, 35]. Moreover, SERS spectroscopy coupled with the PCA has been employed by several authors to discriminate different fungal species on the basis of their spectra [30, 31, 34].

In the present work we have analyzed six different mushroom species having a high economical interest: Lentinula edodes (Berk.) Pegler, Ganoderma lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst., Pleurotus cornucopiae (Paulet) Rolland, Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm, Tuber magnatum Picco and Tuber aestivum Vittad. The basidiomycetes L. edodes, G. lucidum, P. cornucopiae and P. ostreatus are between the most popular and cultivated mushrooms in the world [36, 37]. On the other hand, T. magnatum and T. aestivum are two truffles (hypogeous ascomycetes into the genus Tuber) which are ones of the most highly prized food [38]. Accordingly, the main objective of this work was to develop a fast and simple method for identifying mushrooms with no chemical processing. In addition, in situ analysis of tiny mushroom parts is likely to be a low-cost winning procedure for the characterization of different edible and medicinal mushrooms by SERS spectroscopy combined with chemometric analysis.

Materials and methods

Mushroom samples and conservation

The fruiting bodies of G. lucidum (Glu), L. edodes (Led), P. cornucopiae (Pco), P. ostreatus (Pos), T. aestivum (Tae) and T. magnatum (Tmg) were analyzed. The fruiting bodies of G. lucidum, L. edodes, P. cornucopiae and P. ostreatus were obtained through cultivation on sterilized substrates as described in previous works [39, 40]. Samples of T. aestivum (herbarium No. 5259) and T. magnatum (herbarium No. 3956) were collected in the wild in the provinces of Bologna and Ferrara, Italy, respectively, and stored in the CMI-Unibo Herbarium at the University of Bologna. All samples were dried at 40 °C for 24 h and stored in a desiccator until used.

Raw polysaccharide extraction

Polysaccharide extraction was carried out on 1 g of dried and powdered Glu, Led, Pco and Pos fruiting bodies, following the protocols described by Ma et al. (2014) [41]. The powder was initially treated overnight by immersing it in an 85% ethanol solution. Samples were then centrifuged at 4500 × g for 15 min and the precipitate was extracted in distilled water (25 mL for each g of precipitate) at 70 °C for 140 min. The solution obtained was filtered and centrifuged for 10 min at 4500 × g. The supernatant was deproteinized with Sevag reagent (butanol:chloroform, 1:4 v/v) and centrifuged at 4500 × g for 10 min. The upper layer was removed and mixed with four-fold volume of absolute ethanol in order to precipitate the crude polysaccharides for 12 h at 4 °C. Crude polysaccharides were centrifuged at 4500 × g for 15 min and the precipitate was washed with ethanol and acetone and lyophilized.

Chemical reagents

Silver nitrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, hydroxylamine hydrochloride and other reagents were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All solutions were freshly prepared with Milli-Q® ultrapure distilled water before experiments and used immediately.

Silver NPs preparation

Before silver NPs preparation all glassware was cleaned with aqua regia and rinsed with Milli-Q® ultrapure distilled water to remove any impurities present on glass surface. Solutions of silver nitrate (10–2 M) and of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.67 × 10–3 M) containing 3.33 × 10–3 M sodium hydroxide were used for silver colloid preparation as described by Leopold and Lendl (2003) [42]. Briefly, 10 mL of silver nitrate solution was added dropwise while stirring to 90 mL the hydroxylamine hydrochloride/sodium hydroxide solution. After preparation the colloidal solution was stored at 4 °C in darkness.

Sampling for SERS spectroscopy and mapping

For SERS analyses, small fragments (3 × 3 mm) from the cap and pileus of dry fruiting bodies of Led, Glu, Pco and Pos and fragments from the sterile tissue of the gleba of the two Tuber species, were placed for 24 h into a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1 mL of Milli-Q® ultrapure distilled water. After 24 h the tubes were centrifuged at 11,000 × G for 10 min and all the water was removed. The small wet fragments of each mushroom species were placed on a microscope slide glass and covered with 5 µL of a concentrated Ag-NPs suspension obtained by centrifugation of 500 µL and successive redispersion to 10% of the original volume. Samples were dried at room temperature before SERS analyses. For each mushroom species three biological replicates were made.

Instrumentation

The silver NPs were characterized by using an UV–VIS spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Japan). Raman, SERS, and mapping were performed by using the portable spectrometer Renishaw Raman Virsa™ with a 785 and 532 nm lasers. Before measurements a calibration was performed by using a Si reference sample. Mushroom fragments were analyzed under a 50 × objective long focal lens and the laser power was set at 2 mW with an integration time of 1 s. Samples were mapped by recording the spectra of an area of around 40 × 40 µm for a total of 800 spectra for each sample. The spectra were acquired using the Renishaw WiRE 5.5 program and processed by the OriginPro 2019 software (OriginLabs). The SEM picture was obtained in an environmental scanning electron microscope, Philips XL30 (Philips, the Netherlands), with a tungsten filament operating in high vacuum mode. The acceleration voltage was 25 kV.

Statistical analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to evaluate variations in the data matrix between the analyzed mushrooms in order to identify the single species. Spectra were previously normalized as reported by Dina et al. [30] on the basis of the νAgX band which represents the most intense peak. Processed spectral data were used because of providing much more accurate information on the sample by solving the bands that were previously overlapped in the raw spectra. The PCA was performed by using the OriginPro software with a matrix having a dimension of 18 samples×2303 variables (wavenumbers units, covering the range 100–1800 cm–1). PCA is performed on the variance–covariance matrix band.

Results and discussion

Ag-NPs characterization

The successful Ag-NPs formation strictly depends on the preparation parameters that can be easily handled to produce Ag-NPs of well-defined shape, structure, and size distribution. Based on previous studies [32, 33, 43] the Ag-NPs formation was confirmed by the presence of a narrow band with an absorption maximum at 400 nm in UV–Vis spectroscopy (Fig. 1a). The higher absorption intensity indicates that the number of Ag-NPs formed in the solution rise with increasing reaction time (Fig. 1a). The nanoparticles produced had an average radius of 40 nm. SEM imaging (Fig. 1b) of Ag-NPs confirmed the particle diameter and spherical shape.

Fig.1
figure 1

a UV–Vis extinction spectrum of the Ag-NPs and b SEM image showing Ag-NPs

Full size image

Normal Raman and SERS spectroscopy

One of the main objectives of the present work was to characterize the different molecular species present in mushrooms by using the Raman spectroscopy under the specific excitation at 785 nm. The latter excitation wavelength is usually employed in the analysis of biological materials because it leads to a reduced fluorescence. However, the Raman spectra registered at 785 nm produced no vibrational signals (Fig. 2b). Likewise, a broad background fluorescence at 532 nm was detected as a result of pigment molecules excitation within the mushroom cell wall (data not shown). Therefore, normal Raman spectra collected with two different excitation wavelengths were unable to generate spectra from the mushroom samples. By contrast, the direct deposition of a concentrated drop of Ag-NPs on the mushroom surface was sufficient to generate an enhancement of the SERS signal with 785 nm radiation (Fig. 2a). The spectra registered on different points of the analyzed surface revealed few spectral changes between spectra, thus indicating the reproducibility of the analysis (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a SERS and b normal Raman spectra of small fragments of Pco fruiting body

Full size image

The SERS analyses performed on the six different fungal species (Fig. 3) rendered different spectral responses that can be roughly classified into two main groups. The first one is dominated by nucleic acid signals (adenine (A), guanine (G), thymine (T) and phosphate groups (P)). The second one is characterized by other set of bands that we have assigned to fungal pigments localized in the mushroom cell wall: melanins (M); carotenoids; azaphilones; polyketides, flavonoids, etc. [44]. However, we cannot exclude that these bands are related to the polysaccharides existing in the fungal cell wall as reported by Gieroba et al. (2022) [45]. These two different groups will henceforth be referred to as A-group and B-group, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SERS spectra of Glu (blue line), Tae (green line), Tmg (orange line), Led (purple line), Pco (red line) and Pos (yellow line). A adenine, G guanine, M melanins, P phosphate groups and T thymine

Full size image

In particular, in A-group, the bands of adenine at 735 and 1335 cm−1, and guanine at 660 and 1568 cm−1 were clearly visible [46]. The band at 796 cm−1 can be assigned to the ring breathing band of cytosine and thymine coupled with phosphate vibrations [46]. Other less intense bands in the 960–1100 cm−1 region corresponded to the A-group DNA phosphate and to some ring bands of the purine and pyrimidine bases [22, 46].

The presence of nucleic acid bands in the SERS spectra of fungi was detected in the extracted DNA of Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld, and in the analysis of micro-fungi cells [32, 35]. The detection of nucleic material by SERS in the intact non-treated mushroom fragments is an interesting result, because we expected to detect biomolecules localized in the outer part of fungal cell walls. The fact that the fungal genetic material can be put in evidence under the presence of the Ag-NPs implies two possible effects: (a) diffusion of the nanoparticles inside the fungal cells through the wall, and (b) the disruption of the fungal cell wall and the direct interaction of silver with the intracellular material. Both effects are possible and also they were previously described in the literature [47,48,49].

On the other hand, Ag-NPs have been reported to interact with the fungal membranes through electrostatic interactions [50] or through specific covalent interactions with SH-containing groups leading to the protein denaturation [51]. The latter effect could increase the permeability of the fungal membrane resulting in disruption of the cell membrane [52]. Based on previous studies [50, 52], the appearance of intense bands of nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) in SERS spectra might be due to the disruption of the fungal membrane through the formation of holes in the fungal cell wall and the formation of pores in the plasma membrane through which the cell material can flow outward.

The strong effect of Ag-NPs on DNA and RNA was likely induced by the high affinity of silver for purine and pyrimidine bases. In particular, the interaction of Ag with adenine and guanine has been widely demonstrated in previous SERS analyses of nucleic acids [46, 53]. Our outcomes exhibited changes that may be related to different interaction of DNA and/or possibly RNA with Ag-NPs, as shown in Fig. 3 (Glu, Led, Tae and Tmg). Specifically, the ratio between the ring breathing bands corresponding to adenine (735 cm−1) and guanine (656 cm−1) changed from Glu, where it was maximum and it was dominated by the adenine bands, to Tmg, where the guanine bands were more enhanced in the SERS spectrum. On the other hand, the A/G ratio can be related in SERS with the different hybridization degree of the double-stranded DNA chain [23]. Therefore, in terms of the SERS spectra of mushrooms, this ratio could be related to an effect of silver on the DNA structure.

In the case of B-group (Pos and Pco, Fig. 3), no band corresponding to nucleic acids were observed. Conversely, broad and weak bands were observed at 483, 1223, 1312, 1445 and 1585 cm−1. Similar bands were observed in the case of some pathogenic fungi (Scopulariopsis brumptii Salv.-Duval, Candida krusei (Castell.) Berkhout, Trichophyton rubrum (Castell.) Sabour., Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl., Aspergillus flavus Link, Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg, Aspergillus parasiticus Speare) previously analyzed by SERS [31, 34]. In addition, these Raman spectra showed a high similarity with the SERS of some of the pigments existing in the fungal cell wall, such as flavonoid pigments [54]. More specifically, bands at 1223, 1312 or 1445 cm−1 are visible in fungal melanins that were identified in the fungus Ochroconis sp. by SERS [55, 56]. The prevalence of bands corresponding to pigments presumably embedded in the fungal wall indicated that the cell wall of Pos and Pco remained intact in the presence of Ag-NPs. Therefore, the absence of cell wall rupture resulting in the opening of the plasma membrane could be related to its organization. In fact, it is structured in several layers, with the innermost layer consisting of a covalently bound β-(1,3) glucan core and branched chitin [57, 58]. The outer layers, in contrast, are more heterogeneous and adapted to the physiology of particular fungi and generally composed of polysaccharides such as β-(1,6) glucan, mannan, galactomannan, and also highly mannosylated glycoproteins [59]. In addition, pigments such as melanin are found in this outer layer, as was detected in the SERS of Pco. This peculiar organization of the cell wall provides greater resistance to Ag-NPs.

In addition, another important difference between the mushrooms of the A and B-group is the position of the stretching Ag–X band (νAgX), where X can designate the atom (normally O, S or N) of the fungal biomolecule directly interacting with the metal. This band appeared at 237 cm−1 in the case of the A-group mushrooms, while it is shifted to 220 cm−1 in the mushrooms of the B-group.

For assessing the origin of the SERS Pco and Pos spectra shown in Fig. 3, polysaccharides from fungi of A-group (Glu and Led) and B-group (Pco and Pos) were investigated.

The SERS spectra of polysaccharides are displayed in Fig. 4. The bands corresponding to the cell wall from 1100 to 1600 cm−1 were evident in the Glu, Pos and Pco. However, in the case of Glu (A-group), these bands were not detected in the SERS of intact fruiting body fragments demonstrating the disruption of the cell wall of this mushroom at the presence of Ag-NPs. In the specific case of Led, the adenine bands are still strong in the SERS spectrum of the extracted polysaccharides. This is likely due to the adsorption of Led A-rich DNA sequences to the wall fragments.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SERS spectra of the raw polysaccharides from Pco (red line), Pos (yellow line), Led (purple line) and Glu (blue line)

Full size image

Polysaccharides, mainly β-glucans, are particularly important as they are linked to the medicinal properties of mushrooms (e.g., immunomodulatory, anticancer, and antioxidant). In particular, Glu and Led mushrooms are among of the most important medicinal mushrooms cultivated in the world [60].

Raman mapping and PCA analysis

SERS mapping of Glu and Pco (Fig. 5) was carried out in order to investigate the spatial distribution of bands corresponding to nucleic acids and the fungal cell wall pigments. Figure 5b shows the optical direct image of Glu where the hyphae of the fungus are clearly observed. Figure 5c displays the intensity (purple) of the adenine marker band (735 cm−1). An individual spectrum of a certain point is shown for comparison in Fig. 5a. From this mapping it is possible to corroborate that the signal is located in the hyphae. In the case of Pco, the spectrum corresponds to the fungal cell wall (Fig. 5d), as well as the direct image (Fig. 5e) and the mapping of the marker band distribution at 1218 cm−1 (Fig. 5f). The distribution maps were also recorded to demonstrate the method reproducibility, since the areas with the most intense spectra exhibited no significant variation in the SERS spectral pattern.

Fig. 5
figure 5

SERS mapping of Glu and Pco mushrooms: a Glu spectrum; b direct image of Glu hyphae; c adenine mapping intensity (purple); d Pco cell wall spectrum; e direct image of Pco; f mapping of the marker band distribution at 1218 cm−1 (yellow)

Full size image

The PCA analysis of the Raman-SERS spectra (100–1800 cm–1) allows to discriminate different mushroom species. PC-1 scores accounted for 71% of the total variance of the analyzed dataset, thereby demonstrating separation of the studied mushrooms into three separate clusters (Fig. 6). The first cluster comprises Led, Pco and Pos which belongs to Agaricales order; the second one is represented by Glu species which belong to the Polyporales order. The latter group include Tae and Tmg belonging to Tuberales order.

Fig. 6
figure 6

PCA analysis of the Raman-SERS spectra of the six mushroom species used in this work. The PCA scores of the first two principal components PC-1 (71.40% of total variance) and PC-2 (15.20% of total variance) indicate the formation of three distinct clusters

Full size image

Conclusions

In conclusion, only the SERS technique can afford significant Raman signals from the analyzed mushrooms by the use of Ag-NPs directly dropped onto the intact non-treated biological tissue of the fruiting bodies. The normal Raman spectroscopy is not able to provide vibrational signals due to the high fluorescence emission. SERS provides a very simple and rapid protocol to identify marker biomolecules of cell wall or the nucleic acid components, that can serve to univocally identify the species. Accordingly, two main groups of mushrooms can be recognized from the SERS data based on different spectral patterns: (a) those dominated by nucleic acid signals; and (b) those dominated to other set of bands that we have assigned to fungal pigments localized in the mushroom cell wall. The pigments identified in the fungal cell wall are of polyphenolic nature and could be related to melanins and flavonoids present in this wall. The polysaccharide bands of the cell walls, particularly chitosan and 1,3-D glucan, were exclusively visible in the Pco and Pos spectra and extremely weak in Led, although these bands are also mixed with those of fungal pigments. Raman mapping of fungi was useful for tracing the spatial distribution of marker bands and getting a large number of spectra from a given area, confirming a high repeatability of the analysis. Additionally, the SERS spectra were processed with the PCA algorithm, and the outcomes revealed that they explained 86.6% of the variance among the data. Based on above, the PCA clearly exhibits its applicability with a limited number of fungal species as well. Thus, by using this methodology, more time-consuming methods commonly applied in the laboratory can be avoided or bypassed as well as analysis time can be reduced.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SERS:

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering

FT-IR:

Fourier transform infrared

NPs:

Nanoparticles

PCA:

Principal component analysis

LSPR:

Localized surface plasmonic resonance

Glu:

G. lucidum

Led:

L. edodes

Pco:

P. cornucopiae

Pos:

P. ostreatus

Tae:

T. aestivum

Tmg:

T. magnatum

A:

Adenine

G:

Guanine

T:

Thymine

P:

Phosphate groups

M:

Melanines

Chi:

Chitosan

Glc:

Glucan

References

  1. Wu B, Hussain M, Zhang W, Stadler M, Liu X, Xiang M. Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi. Mycology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2019.1614106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang ST, Miles PG. Mushroom biology—a new discipline. Mycologist. 1992;6:64–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wasser S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1076-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badalyan SM, Zambonelli A. Biotechnological exploitation of macrofungi for the production of food, pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals. In: Sridhar KR, Deshmukh SK, editors. Advances in macrofungi: diversity, ecology and biotechnology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019. p. 199–230.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raja HA, Miller AN, Pearce CJ, Oberlies NH. Fungal identification using molecular tools: a primer for the natural products research community. J Nat Prod. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Motteu N, Goemaere B, Bladt S, Packeu A. Implementation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify fungi from the indoor environment as an added value to the classical morphology-based identification tool. Front Allergy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.826148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Zhang J, Li T, Liu H, Li J, Wang Y. Geographical traceability of wild Boletus edulis based on data fusion of FT-MIR and ICP-AES coupled with data mining methods (SVM). Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.01.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li XP, Li J, Liu H, Wang YZ. A new analytical method for discrimination of species in Ganodermataceae mushrooms. Int J Food Prop. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1722159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards HGM, Russell NC, Weinstein R, Wynn-Williams DD. Fourier transform Raman spectroscopic study of fungi. J Raman Spectrosc. 1995;26:911–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stöckel S, Kirchhoff J, Neugebauer U, Rösch P, Popp J. The application of Raman spectroscopy for the detection and identification of microorganisms. J Raman Spectrosc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faghihzadeh F, Anaya NM, Schifman LA, Oyanedel-Craver V. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to assess molecular-level changes in microorganisms exposed to nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-016-0001-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aroca RF. Plasmon enhanced spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp44103b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aroca R. Surface-Enhanced Vibrational Spectroscopy. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Moskovits M. Surface-enhanced spectroscopy. Rev Mod Phys. 1985;57:783–826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moskovits M, Suh JS. Surface selection rules for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: calculations and application to the surface-enhanced Raman spectrum of phthalazine on silver. J Phys Chem. 1984. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150667a013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Butler HJ, Ashton L, Bird B, Cinque G, Curtis K, Dorney J, et al. Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials. Nat Protoc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Ru EC, Etchegoin PG. Principles of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (and related plasmonic effects). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee HK, Lee YH, Koh CSL, Phan-Quang GC, Han X, Lay CL, et al. Designing surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) platforms beyond hotspot engineering: emerging opportunities in analyte manipulations and hybrid materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00786h.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Zhao S, Zheng J, He L. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined techniques for high-performance detection and characterization. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giannini V, Sánchez-Gil J, García-Ramos JV. Modelo teórico del mecanismo electromagnético en espectroscopia SERS. Óptica Pura y Apl. 2004;37:97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guerrini L, Izquierdo-Lorenzo I, Rodriguez-Oliveros R, Sanchez-Gil JA, Sanchez-Cortes S, Garcia-Ramos JV, et al. α, ω-aliphatic diamines as molecular linkers for engineering Ag nanoparticle clusters: tuning of the interparticle distance and sensing application. Plasmonics. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-010-9143-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kneipp K, Flemming J. Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of nucleic acids adsorbed on colloidal silver particles. J Mol Struct. 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2860(86)87041-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barhoumi A, Halas NJ. Label-free detection of DNA hybridization using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja105678z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Calderon I, Guerrini L, Alvarez-Puebla RA. Targets and tools: nucleic acids for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biosensors. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11070230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fazio B, D’Andrea C, Foti A, Messina E, Irrera A, Donato MG, et al. SERS detection of biomolecules at physiological pH via aggregation of gold nanorods mediated by optical forces and plasmonic heating. Sci Rep. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Almehmadi LM, Curley SM, Tokranova NA, Tenenbaum SA, Lednev IK. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for single molecule protein detection. Sci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48650-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han XX, Huang GG, Zhao B, Ozaki Y. Label-free highly sensitive detection of proteins in aqueous solutions using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Anal Chem. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900395x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang K, Pu H, Sun DW. Emerging spectroscopic and spectral imaging techniques for the rapid detection of microorganisms: an overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen M, Yu Z, Lu X. Application of Raman spectroscopic methods in food safety: a review. Biosensors. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11060187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dina NE, Gherman AMR, Chiş V, Sârbu C, Wieser A, Bauer D, et al. Characterization of clinically relevant fungi via SERS fingerprinting assisted by novel chemometric models. Anal Chem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Witkowska E, Jagielski T, Kamińska A, Kowalska A, Hryncewicz-Gwóźdź A, Waluk J. Detection and identification of human fungal pathogens using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and principal component analysis. Anal Methods. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02957d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prusinkiewicz MA, Farazkhorasani F, Dynes JJ, Wang J, Gough KM, Kaminskyj SGW. Proof-of-principle for SERS imaging of Aspergillus nidulans hyphae using in vivo synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Analyst. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2an35620a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lemma T, Wang J, Arstila K, Hytönen VP, Toppari JJ. Identifying yeasts using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2019.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramirez-Perez JC, Reis AT, Olivera CLP, Rizzutto MA. Impact of silver nanoparticles size on SERS for detection and identification of filamentous fungi. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.120980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yüksel S, Schwenkbier L, Pollok S, Weber K, Cialla-May D, Popp J. Label-free detection of Phytophthora ramorum using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analyst. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an01156f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Royse DJ, Baars J, Tan Q. Current overview of mushroom production in the world. In: Zied DC, Pardo-Giménez A, editors. Edible and medicinal mushrooms: technology and applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2017. p. 5–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Bijalwan A, Bahuguna K, Vasishth A, Singh A, Chaudhary S, Dongariyal A, et al. Growth performance of Ganoderma lucidum using billet method in Garhwal Himalaya India. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zambonelli A, Iotti M, Puliga F, Hall IR. Enhancing white truffle (Tuber magnatum Picco and T borchii Vittad) cultivation through biotechnology innovation. In: Al-Khayri JM, Jain SM, Johnson DV, editors. Advances in plant breeding strategies: vegetable crops. Cham: Springer; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fornito S, Puliga F, Leonardi P, Di Foggia M, Zambonelli A, Francioso O. Degradative ability of mushrooms cultivated on corn silage digestate. Molecules. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Puliga F, Leonardi P, Minutella F, Zambonelli A, Francioso O. Valorization of hazelnut shells as growing substrate for edible and medicinal mushrooms. Horticulturae. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8030214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma G, Yang W, Mariga AM, Fang Y, Ma N, Pei F, et al. Purification, characterization and antitumor activity of polysaccharides from Pleurotus eryngii residue. Carbohydr Polym. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Leopold N, Lendl B. A new method for fast preparation of highly surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) active silver colloids at room temperature by reduction of silver nitrate with hydroxylamine hydrochloride. J Phys Chem B. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp027460u.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zanasi G, Rubira RJG, Francioso O, Cañamares MV, Constantino CJL, Sanchez-Cortes S. Sensing atrazine herbicide degradation products through their interactions with humic substances by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chemosensors. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9060148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin L, Xu J. Fungal pigments and their roles associated with human health. J Fungi. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOF6040280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gieroba B, Sroka-Bartnicka A, Kazimierczak P, Kalisz G, Lewalska-Graczyk A, Vivcharenko V, et al. Surface chemical and morphological analysis of chitosan/1,3-β-D-glucan polysaccharide films cross-linked at 90 °C. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Otto C, van den Tweel TJJ, de Mul FFM, Greve J. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of DNA bases. J Raman Spectrosc. 1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/JRS.1250170311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xia ZK, Ma QH, Li SY, Zhang DQ, Cong L, Tian YL, et al. The antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on Trichosporon asahii. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMII.2014.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim SW, Jung JH, Lamsal K, Kim YS, Min JS, Lee YS. Antifungal effects of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against various plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2012.40.1.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Panáček A, Kolář M, Večeřová R, Prucek R, Soukupová J, Kryštof V, et al. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles against Candida spp. Biomaterials. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2009.07.065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotech Biol Med. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANO.2006.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dibrov P, Dzioba J, Gosink KK, Häse CC. Chemiosmotic mechanism of antimicrobial activity of Ag+ in Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.46.8.2668-2670.2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim J, Lee J, Kwon S, Jeong S. Preparation of biodegradable Polymer/Silver nanoparticles composite and its antibacterial efficacy. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1166/JNN.2009.C096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rivas L, Murza A, Sánchez-Cortés S, García-Ramos JV. Interaction of antimalarial drug quinacrine with nucleic acids of variable sequence studied by spectroscopic methods. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2000.10506674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jurasekova Z, Garcia-Ramos JV, Domingo C, Sanchez-Cortes S. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of flavonoids. J Raman Spectrosc. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Martin-Sanchez PM, Sanchez-Cortes S, Lopez-Tobar E, Jurado V, Bastian F, Alabouvette C, et al. The nature of black stains in Lascaux Cave, France, as revealed by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.3053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. De La Rosa JM, Martin-Sanchez PM, Sanchez-Cortes S, Hermosin B, Knicker H, Saiz-Jimenez C. Structure of melanins from the fungi Ochroconis lascauxensis and Ochroconis anomala contaminating rock art in the Lascaux Cave. Sci Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13862-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirończuk-Chodakowska I, Witkowska AM. Evaluation of polish wild mushrooms as beta-glucan sources. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen L, Xu W, Lin S, Cheung PCK. Cell wall structure of mushroom sclerotium (Pleurotus tuber-regium): part 1 fractionation and characterization of soluble cell wall polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gow NAR, Latge J-P, Munro CA. The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectr. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Venturella G, Ferraro V, Cirlincione F, Gargano ML. Medicinal mushrooms: bioactive compounds, use, and clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work has also been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, the European Union FEDER funds under PID2020-113900RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 project and the Grant PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014–2020, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale G. Fanin 40-50, 40127, Bologna, Italy

    Federico Puliga, Veronica Zuffi, Alessandra Zambonelli & Ornella Francioso

  2. Instituto de Estructura de La Materia, IEM-CSIC, Serrano, 121, E-28006, Madrid, Spain

    Santiago Sanchez-Cortes

Authors
  1. Federico Puliga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veronica Zuffi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandra Zambonelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ornella Francioso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Santiago Sanchez-Cortes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, FP and SSC; methodology, FP and SSC; validation, SSC; formal analysis, FP and SSC; investigation, FP and VZ; resources, SSC, AZ and OF; data curation, SSC; writing—original draft preparation, FP; writing—review and editing, FP, VZ, SSC, OF and AZ; visualization, FP, SSC and VZ; supervision, SSC, OF and AZ; funding acquisition, SSC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Puliga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puliga, F., Zuffi, V., Zambonelli, A. et al. Spectroscopic analysis of mushrooms by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 9, 100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00367-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00367-3

Keywords