Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Insecticidal and repellent effects of Mentha longifolia L. essential oil against Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 10, Article number: 18 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chemical control is generally used against aphids. The harmful effects of the chemicals used in the control on the environment and human health have contributed to the development of alternative control methods. The main objective of this study was to determine chemical composition of Mentha longifolia L. essential oil obtained from spontaneous plants in Algeria, investigate repellent and con-tact toxicity effect on Aphis craccivora Koch control, and assess the impacts of essential oil on development, survival and reproduction of A. craccivora.

Results

The essential oil showed a concentration dependent significant toxic and repellent effects. The highest effect was recorded for 8 μl/ml concentration of essential oil. The repellent effect and mortality rate in 8 μl/ml concentration were 84.37 and 80.66%, respectively. The values of LC50 and LC90 were 1.848 and 26.782 μl/ml, respectively. The effect of essential oil on immature period, adult longevity, natal period, survival, and fecundity was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The findings in this study showed that the essential oil of M. longifolia harvested in the Tamanrasset region of Algeria has a toxic effect on A. craccivora, and can have a potential to be used as an insecticide to control A. craccivora. The use of environmentally friendly bioinsecticide will enable effective management of A. craccivora.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Aphids are important plant pests in agricultural production [1, 2]. The aphids retard plant growth by transmitting viruses, and also sucking out the sap, and significantly reduces crop yield [3].

Cowpea aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch, Hemiptera: Aphididae) is one of the polyphagous and cosmopolitan aphid species and was spotted in nineteen families with preference on leguminous plants [4]. The cowpea aphid is a harmful pest, and damage crops in open field and greenhouse by sucking the host sap, that is essential for plant growth. In addition, the pest indirectly damages to its host transmitting virus and producing honeydew [5]. The honeydew causes sooty molds that inhibit the photosynthesis activity of plants, and also mutualism with ants that can disrupt plant growth [6].

Several methods have been investigated to control aphids in different parts of the world. The aphids are commonly controlled using broad-spectrum chemical insecticides, which may cause the resurgence of target pests, secondary pest infestations, and the development of insecticide resistance in target pests [7]. In addition, the toxicity of pesticides has become a major environmental problem, as they are toxic to humans and many non-target organisms. Therefore, safe, inexpensive and environmentally friendly alternatives are needed to prevent the damage caused by excessive use of synthetic pesticides. Significant efforts have focused on plant-based natural substances as an interesting alternative [8]. Several studies have reported that essential oils derived from plants and considered as biopesticides could be employed in IPM programs to minimize the use of pesticide and manage the pest resistance [9, 10].

Plants of Mentha genus, spread worldwide, are belong to the Lamiaceae family and are represented by many species commonly known as mint. Most of plants in Mentha genus are known for their ability to generate a wide array of economically bioactive secondary metabolites [11]. The repellent properties, toxicity and some antifeedant activities of Mentha against various insects/pests have been studied [5, 12]. The effects of more than a thousand plants on insects have been studied, while only a few have actually been used in practice [13, 14].

Literature survey revealed that the insecticidal effect of Algerian M. longifolia essential oil on A. craccivora or any other aphids have not been studied yet. Furthermore, no experiments have been conducted to evaluate the impacts of Algerian M. longifolia essential oil on the demographic parameters of aphids. Few study on the insecticidal activity of M. longifolia essential oil has been reported against aphids [15, 16]. Therefore, due to the adoption of new eco-friendly aphid control strategies, the main objective of this study was to determine chemical composition of M. longifolia essential oil obtained from spontaneous plants in Algeria, investigate repellent and contact toxicity effect on A. craccivora control, and assess the impacts of essential oil on development, survival, and reproduction of A. craccivora.

Materials and methods

Plant material and essential oil extraction

Fresh leaves and stems of M. longifolia were harvested from Gueltate Afilal site in Tamanrasset region of the South Algeria and provided by Haggar National Park Office (OPNA). The species of this plant was identified by Dr. Rayane SAIFI and was confirmed by Mr. Mohammed BELGHOUL (Botanist chief curator). A voucher specimen (herbarium number: N°213/BH/SPF/SPDF/DEDPN/22) was deposited in the herbarium at Mr. Mohammed BELGHOUL.

In essential oil extraction, 100 g of air-dried plant materials were hydro-distilled for 4 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The extracted oil was drıed from the hydrolat using MgSO4 by decantation [17]. The extraction was replicated five times, and the extracted oil was stored in the dark at 4 ℃. Essential oil yield was computed according to Carré [18] and expressed as a percentage to assess the efficiency of the extraction.

The physicochemical characteristics of M. longifolia essential oil were determined using the standards of the French Association for Standardization AFNOR [19]. The physicochemical characteristics determined were organoleptic properties, density, refractive index, pH, acidity index, and saponification index. In addition, 0.2 µl of the essential oil was injected to GC–MS with a column temperature varied between 50 and 250 °C at 5 °C/min. The essential oil was injected at 250 °C, and helium was used as the carrier gas (1 ml/min). The components of essential oil were identified based on retention time and mass spectra compared with the known compounds stored in the software database Libraries (NIST08, WILLEY8 and FAME) [20].

Test insect

Aphis craccivora used in the experiment were collected from an infected green bean field in Tazrouk (Tamanrasset) (23°24′51″ N and 6°15′47″ E) in 2021. The insects were reared on Vicia faba L. (Luz de’otono variety) and kept in a well-ventilated place allowing light to penetrate. Density of the aphids was maintained at low level. The aphids were transferred to the new plants at 2–3 leaf stage, every 15 days to avoid the appearance of alatae aphids responsible for the dispersal and emigration of colonies under the group effect [21].

Repellent effect

The repellent effect of M. longifolia essential oil against apterous adults of A. craccivora was evaluated according to the preferential zone method of filter paper described by Sayed et al. [16] with some modifications. Filter paper (Whatman No. 2 discs/9 cm in diameter) was divided into two equal parts. Five different essential oil concentrations (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 µl/ml) were prepared by dilution in acetone. A quantity of 0.5 ml essential oil solution (Nt) was spread evenly on each half of the disc, while the other half received only 0.5 ml of acetone (Nc). Each concentration had four replications. The two halves of the discs were resoldered with adhesive tape after 15 min, and then placed in a Petri dish. The adult aphids of the same size were distributed in the center of each disc at a rate of 16 specimens per dish. Two hours later, the number of insects on each part treated with Nt and the number of aphids present on the part treated only with Nc were recorded. The average percent repellence (Pr%) for each concentration was calculated using the following equation:

$$Pr\%=\frac{\left(Nc-NT\right)}{\left(Nc+Nt\right)}\times 100$$

The repellent index (RI) was calculated to attribute the repellent effect of M. longifolia essential oil on A. craccivora adults using the following equation:

$$RI=\frac{2Nc}{\left(Nc+Nt\right)}$$

The essential oil was considered as repellent (R) if the mean RI was less than 1 − SD, otherwise the oil was considered as an attractant (A). The RI value between R and A was I defined as indifferent (I) [22].

Insecticidal activity of M. longifolia essential oil on Aphid adults by contact

Activities of the extracted essential oil on 30 adults of A. craccivora were tested in Petri dishes at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μl/ml essential oil concentrations by direct spraying. Meanwhile, acetone 3% alone was used as a control. Each concentration had four replicates. The number of dead insects was counted after 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of exposure. Aphid mortality data were adjusted using correction formula of Abbott and lethal concentration 50 (LC50), and 90 (LC90) values were calculated using probit analysis [23, 24].

Insecticidal activity of M. longifolia essential oil on demographic parameters of the Aphid

From the apterous adults of A. craccivora, the newborn nymphs obtained 24 h later were transferred individually. Some nymphs were treated wih acetone used as the control treatment, while others were treated with different concentrations of essential oil (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μl/ml). A moistened cotton was placed undersurface of an uninfected apical leaf of Vicia to prevent the leaf from drying. These leaves were placed in petri dishes with multiple pinholes to allow aeration and guarantee the captivity of insects. The petri dishes were placed in a growth chamber following standard conditions for aphid culture (25 ± 3 °C, 40 ± 5% R.H with L16:D8 photoperiod). Each treatment started with 30 newborn nymphs produced in the growth chamber. The leaves were replaced as needed with fresh ones every 1–3 days. The nymphal development and productions were recorded every 24 h until the deaths of adults. The development period (mean ± SE) of the life stages, pre-reproductivity, reproductivity, adult longevity, survival, and fecundity was determined [25, 26].

Data analysis

Layout of all the experiments was completely randomized, with four replicates. Normality of the data tested using Shapiro–Wilk test [27]. The effects of essential oil concentration on repellent effect and insecticidal activity were assessed using a variance analysis (ANOVA). When the ANOVA indicated a significant difference between the treatments, Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05) was used to compare the mean values for different treatments. All statistical analyses were carried out using XLSTAT statistical software (Addinsoft, New York, USA).

Results

Essential oil analysis

The quantity of essential oil for wild mint obtained from the different extraction replications was the same. The average essential oil yield from aerial part of the plant was 1.49 ± 0.46%. The organoleptic and physicochemical properties provide a means of verification and quality control for the essential oil. The essential oil obtained was light yellow color, lipidic and liquid at room temperature. The smell of essential oil was agree-able, yet very strong and persistent. The values of density (d), pH, refractive index (n), acid-ity index and saponification index for essential oil quality are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The physicochemical properties of wild mint (Mentha longifolia) essential oil
Full size table

The compounds of M. longifolia essential oil determined using GC-MS are presented in Table 2. Essential oil contained sixty-six compounds. The concentrations of Pulegone (31.85%), Carvone (23.18%), Isomenthone (13.53%) and Eucalyptol (5.72%) were higher compared to the rest of the compounds.

Table 2 The compounds of wild mint (M. longifolia.) essential oil identified using GC-MS method
Full size table

Repellent effect

The average repellent rate and index of M. longifolia essential oil against A. craccivora are given in Fig. 1 and Table 3. This natural substance had a significant repellent effect on adults of A. craccivora, and the repellent activity was improved with the increase in essential oil concentration. The repellent highest rate (84.37%) was recorded after 2 h for the highest essential oil concentration (8 µl/ml), while the lowest repellent rate (3.12%) was obtained for the concentration of 0.5 µl/ml (Fig. 1). Repellent index (RI) of essential oil demonstrated that the repellence (R) against A. craccivora was significant for 2 µl/ml and higher concentrations, while the repellence effect was indifferent (I) for the concentrations lower than 2 µl/ml (Table 3.).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage repellence effects of essential oil concentrations against A. craccivora adults after 2 h of exposure; The mean value followed by the same letter was not statistically different (p > 0.05). The bar represents a standart deviation (SD)

Full size image
Table 3 Repellent effect (mean ± SE) of M. longifolia essential oil against A. craccivora adults after 2 h of exposure
Full size table

Insect mortality bioassay by contact

The results of different concentrations of wild mint essential oil on the mortality rate of A. craccivora adults proved that the oil significantly affected the survival of A. craccivora after 24 h (F: 74.054, p < 0.0001, df: 119). The survival of aphids decreased with the increase of essential oil concentration and duration of exposure. The mean mortality rate recorded for the lowest and highest concentrations after 24 h were 28.66 and 80.66%, respectively (Fig. 2). The LC50 and LC90 values after 24 h of exposure were 1.848 and 26.782 μl/ml, respectively (Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean cumulative mortality rates of A. craccivora adults recorded following the treatments with essential oil of M. longifolia. The same upper and lower-case letters above the bars indicate no significant difference between the concentrations and the time, respectively. The bar represents a standart deviation (SD)

Full size image
Table 4 Lethal concentration (LC50 and LC90) for A. craccivora treated with M. longifolia essential oil
Full size table

Insecticidal activity on aphid demographic parameters

The mean duration effect of different essential oil concentrations on each nymphal stage of A. craccivora is summarized in Table 5. The impact of different concentrations on total duration of the immature stage was highly significant (p < 0.0001), nevertheless, the effect on the first three nymphal stages was slight. In addition, the duration effect decreased as the essential oil concentration increased.

Table 5 Insecticidal effect of M. longifolia on biological parameters of A. craccivora (mean ± SE)
Full size table

The mean adult longevity of A. craccivora for 0.5 µl/ml essential oil treatment was 17.166 days and decreased to 1.2 days in 8 µl/ml concentration. The results revealed that total longevity of A. craccivora was strongly affected by the application of essential oil. The highest prereproductive and reproductive periods (3.2 and 13.966 days, respectively) were recorded in the lowest essential oil concentration tested, while the lowest values (0.633 and 0.566 days, respectively) were in the highest concentration tested. The highest total number of offspring per female of A. craccivora (37.566 nymphs) was obtained at 0.5 µl/ml essential oil treatment (Table 5). The results indicated a direct relationship between the essential oil concentration and the impact on various biological parameters of A. craccivora, and the impact was higher at the higher treatment concentrations.

Discussion

Several origins of wild mint plant have great morphological diversity expressed by more than 276 subspecies and varieties, of which the essential oil has subjected to several studies [28]. The average essential oil yield tested in this study was different compared to the essential oil yield reported in different studies, while the yield was still within the range stated in the literature [29, 30]. The differences in essential oil yield could be attributed to variation in climatic and edaphic conditions, harvest season, stage of plant development, and cultivation practices, as well as the extraction method and the solvent used [13, 29]. The organoleptic properties of the essential oil are consistent with those obtained for M. longifolia essential oil from two Tunisian localities [15]. Identification of physicochemical properties is a mandatory step, but not sufficient, which helps explaining the chromatographic profile of an essential oil. The qualitative or quantitative chemical composition of M. longifolia essential oil varies drastically in. The pulegone was reported as the most abundant substance of M. longifolia essential oil [31,32,33,34]. Studies conducted in Iran, Greece, Tunisia and South Africa revealed that other dominant compounds of the essential oil are Ciscarveol (53–78%), Carvone (55%), Menthol (33%) and Menthone (31–48%), respectively [29, 35,36,37,38]. The insecticidal activities of plant oils have been attributed to some of the main chemical constituents [39]. The presence of more than one compound in the M. longifolia essential oil may be considered as an advantage in pest control. For this reason, studies should be conducted on the effect of M. longifolia essential oil on other plant pests.

The repellent properties of essential oils and extracts of the mint genus have been well-documented and proven against many pests [40], which has also been confirmed by this study. The repellent effect of M. longifolia essential oil on other aphids and pests, such as Aphis punicae Passerini and Anopheles stephensi Liston has proven [41, 42]. The repellent effect of Allium sativum L. and Mentha piperita L. essential oils on A. craccivora was 100% at the higher concentration than the essential oil concentrations tested in this study [43].

In our study, during the application of M. longifolia essential oil on A. craccivora, the LC50 value obtained after 24 h of application is 1.848 µl/ml. For Sayed et al. [16] and Zamani et al. [15], the essential oil extracted from the M. longifolia plant, respectively, gave an LC50 value against A. punicae of 2.4 µg/ml after 24 h of application and Aphis gossypii Glover of 0.059 µl/l after 72 h of application; this may be due to the behavior of the species against these oils as well as their genetics and morphology. Other researchers have studied the toxic effect of certain plant oils and other commercial liquid formulations against A. craccivora. Aziz et al. [44] studied the toxic effects of neem oil and cinnamic essential oil and found that mortality increased with dose and time, and LC50 values were 126.26 and 378.68 ppm after 7 days of application. For commercial liquid formulations of Nimbecidin, Green Miracle and their mixtures, the mortality rate of adults of A. craccivora increased with increasing application concentrations and the mixture of Nimbecidin (0.3 ml/l) with Green Miracle (3 ml/l) caused 100% mortality of A. craccivora after 3 days, while the mortality rate in separate treatments of Nimbecidin (0.6 ml/l) and Green Miracle (5.0 ml/l) was 100% after 5 and 6 days, respectively. LC90 and LC50 were 0.4 and 0.13 ml/l for nimbecidine, 3.5 and 1.7 ml/l for Green Miracle and 2.2 and 1.3 ml/l when mixing Nimbecidine and green miracle together [45]. Lethal toxicity depends on several factors, such as species studied, chemical composition, and experimental conditions [9]. The contact toxicity of essential oil on the same pest has been demonstrated in other studies. The LC50 value for Pimpinella anisum L., Majorana hortansis Moench, and Citrus vulgaris L. was of 5893.508, 6776.757, and 11530.09 ppm, respectively [46]. The results were in agreement with that obtained for Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng essential oil [47]. The concentrations of either LC50 or LC90 given in previous studies are higher than the concentrations obtained in this study. In addition, M. longifolia essential oil has also antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [35, 48], fumigant, and repellent effects on storage pests Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius [34, 39]. The effect of M. longifolia on different parameters of aphid development is consistent with those obtained with commercial liquid formulations of Nimbecidine and Green Miracle products and their mixtures regarding the impact on demographic parameters [32, 45]. The results revealed that M. longifolia essential oil could be used as an alternative in integrated pest control. However, further field experiments are needed to investigate the effects of M. longifolia essential oil on aphids and associated predators.

Conclusions

Bioinsecticides has an important role in future IPMs to manage insect resistance, to protect public health and to alleviate concerns on environmental pollution due to synthetic pesticide use in agricultural production. The findings in this study showed that the essential oil of M. longifolia harvested in the Tamanrasset region of Algeria has a toxic effect on A. craccivora, and can have a potential to be used as an insecticide to control A. craccivora. The use of environmentally friendly bioinsecticide will enable effective management of A. craccivora, and provide a safe environment, and enable high quality crops to be obtained.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

IPM:

Integrated pest managements

RI:

Repellent index

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

LC50 :

Lethal concentrations 50

LC90 :

Lethal concentrations 90

Nc:

The number of insects on the part with any treatment

Nt:

The number of insects on the part treated

Pr%:

The average percent repellence

References

  1. Horikoshi R, Goto K, Mitomi M, Oyama K, Sunazuka T, Ōmura S. Insecticidal properties of pyripyropene A, a microbial secondary metabolite, against agricultural pests. J Pestic Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D18-030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Czerniewicz P, Chrzanowski G. The effect of santolina chamaecyparissus and tagetes patula essential oils on biochemical markers of oxidative stress in aphids. Insects. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12040360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kandil MA, Abdallah IS, Abou-Yousef HM, Abdallah NA, Fouad EA. Mechanism of resistance to pirimicarb in the cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora. Crop Prot. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borowiak-Sobkowiak B, Durak R, Wilkaniec B. Morphology, biology and behavioral aspects of Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Robinia pseudoacacia. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2432/asphc.2017.1.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayed S, Elarnaouty SA, Ali E. Suitability of five plant species extracts for their compatibility with indigenous Beauveria bassiana against Aphis gossypii Glov. (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00361-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Le MA. Puceron de l’arachide. Biologie et contrôle Oléagineux. 1984;39(8–9):425–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saruhan I, Erper I, Tuncer C, Uçak H, Öksel C, Akça I. Evaluation of some commercial products of entomopathogenic fungi as biocontrol agents for Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2014;24(1):225–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lougraimzi H, El Iraqui S, Bouaichi A, Gouit S, Achbani EH, Fadli M. Insecticidal effect of essential oil and powder of Mentha pulegium L. leaves against Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus, 1763) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst, 1797) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Tenebrionidae), the main pests of stored wheat in morocco. Polish J Entomol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjen-2018-0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mossa ATH. Green pesticides: essential oils as biopesticides in insect-pest management. J Environ Sci Technol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3923/JEST.2016.354.378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ikawati S, Himawan T, Abadi AL, Tarno H. Toxicity nanoinsecticide based on clove essential oil against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). J Pestic Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D20-059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hajlaoui H, Snoussi M, Ben Jannet H, Mighri Z, Bakhrouf A. Comparison of chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of Mentha longifolia L. ssp. longifolia essential oil from two Tunisian localities (Gabes and Sidi Bouzid). Ann Microbiol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03175551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sánchez-Borzone M, Marin L, García D. Effects of insecticidal ketones present in mint plants on GABAA receptor from mammalian neurons. Pharmacogn Mag. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.197638.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarasevičiene Ž, Velička A, Jariene E, Paulauskiene A, Kieltyka-Dadasiewicz A, Sawicka B, Gajewski M. Comparison of chemical composition and colour parameters of different Mentha genus plants grown under organic conditions. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2019. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Durr TD, Stratton CA, Dosoky NS, Satyal P, Murrell EG. Shared phytochemicals predict efficacy of essential oils against western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) in the greenhouse. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-022-00328-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zamani Verdi M, Abbasipour H, Goudarzvande Chegini S. Study on the chemical composition and insecticidal activity of the wild mint (Mentha longifolia L) essential oil against the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover). IAU Entomol Res J. 2018;10(2):89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sayed S, Soliman MM, Al-Otaibi S, Hassan MM, Elarrnaouty SA, Abozeid SM, El-Shehawi AM. Toxicity, deterrent and repellent activities of four essential oils on Aphis punicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Plants. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Boukhatem MN, Hamaidi MS, Saidi F, Hakim Y. Extraction, composition et propriétés physico-chimiques de l’huile essentielle du Géranium Rosat (Pelargonium graveolens L) cultivé dans la plaine de Mitidja (Algérie). Nat Technol. 2010;3:37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saifi R, Belhamra M. L’effet insecticide de l’huile essentielle du Thymus pallescens endémique sur l’Aphis fabae scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Courrier du Savoir. 2018;26:131–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Didier D. Recueil de normes sur les huiles essentielles tome 1: echantillonnage et méthodes d’analyses. 6th ed. Paris: France; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fagbemi KO, Aina DA, Coopoosamy RM, Olajuyigbe OO. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry chemical profile investigation and biological activities of ethylacetate fraction of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) pulp used in the treatment of urinary tract infections. J Med Plants Econ Dev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.4102/jomped.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharp J, Andrade M. An Investigation of the behavior of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Test Stud Lab Teach. 1994;15:335–46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jayaram CS, Chauhan N, Dolma SK, Reddy SE. Chemical composition and insecticidal activities of essential oils against the pulse beetle. Molecules. 2022;27(2):568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vincent K. Probit analysis. San Francisco: San Francisco State University; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Akca I, Ayvaz T, Yazici E, Smith CL, Chi H. Demography and population projection of Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae): with additional comments on life table research criteria. J Econ Entomol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meradsi F, Laamari M. Behavioral and biological responses of black bean aphid (Aphis fabae, Scopoli, 1763) on seven Algerian local broad bean cultivars. Acta Agric Slov. 2018. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2018.111.3.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52(3/4):591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharopov FS, Sulaimonova VA, Setzer WN. Essential oil composition of Mentha longifolia from wild essential oil composition of Mentha longifolia from wild populations growing in Tajikistan populations growing in Tajikistan. J Med Active Plants. 2012. https://doi.org/10.7275/r5736ntn.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aksit H, Demirtas I, Telci I, Tarimcilar G. Chemical diversity in essential oil composition of Mentha longifolia (L.) Hudson subsp. typhoides (Briq.) harley var typhoides from Turkey. J Essent Oil Res. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2013.829005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Iqbal T, Hussain AI, Chatha SAS, Naqvi SAR, Bokhari TH. Antioxidant activity and volatile and phenolic profiles of essential oil and different extracts of wild mint (Mentha longifolia) from the Pakistani flora. J Anal Methods Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/536490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Asekun OT, Grierson DS, Afolayan AJ. Effects of drying methods on the quality and quantity of the essential oil of Mentha longifolia L. subsp. Capensis. Food Chem. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.02.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdel-Hameed ESS, Salman MS, Fadl MA, Elkhateeb A, Hassan MM. Chemical composition and biological activity of Mentha longifolia L. essential oil growing in Taif, KSA extracted by hydrodistillation, solvent free microwave and microwave hydrodistillation. J Essent Oil Bearing Plants. 2018;21(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Louni M, Shakarami J, Negahban M. Insecticidal efficacy of nanoemulsion containing Mentha longifolia essential oil against Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Crop Prot. 2018;7(2):171–82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mirshekar A. Chemical composition and insecticidal activities of Mentha longifolia and Mentha mozaffarianii essential oils against Callosobruchus maculatus. Chem Methodol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22034/chemm.2021.136811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hafedh H, Fethi BA, Mejdi S, Emira N, Amina B. Effect of Mentha longifolia L. ssp longifolia essential oil on the morphology of four pathogenic bacteria visualized by atomic force microscopy. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR.9000254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koliopoulos G, Pitarokili D, Kioulos E, Michaelakis A, Tzakou O. Chemical composition and larvicidal evaluation of mentha, salvia, and Melissa essential oils against the West Nile virus mosquito Culex pipiens. Parasitol Res. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1865-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeinali H, Arzani A, Razmjoo K, Rezaee MB. Evaluation of oil compositions of iranian mints (Mentha ssp.). J Essent Oil Res. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2005.9698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abobakr Y, Al-Sarar AS, Abdel-Kader MS. Fumigant toxicity and feeding deterrent activity of essential oils from Lavandula dentata, Juniperus procera, and Mentha longifolia against the Land Snail Monacha obstructa. Agriculture. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Odeyemi OO, Masika P, Afolayan AJ. Insecticidal activities of essential oil from the leaves of Mentha longifolia L. subsp. capensis against Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Afr Entomol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.4001/1021-3589-16.2.220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S. Insecticidal properties of mentha species: a review. Ind Crops Prod. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.02.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Martín-Ramos P, Martín-Gil J, Gonzalez Garcia V, Sayed S, Mohamed Soliman M, Al-Otaibi S, Hassan MM, Elarrnaouty SA, Abozeid SM, El-Shehawi AM. Toxicity, deterrent and repellent activities of four essential oils on Aphis punicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Plants. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pirmohammadi M, Abai MR, Shayeghi M, Vatandoost H, Rahimi S, Pirmohammadi M. Influence of agro-climatic conditions on chemical compositions and repellency effect of Mentha longifolia plant against malaria vector. Anopheles Stephensi Toxin Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2021.2022699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmed AAI, El-Salam AMEA, El-Hawary FMA. Persistence and biological activity of mint and garlic oils against the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2007;17(1/2):29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aziz WZ, Shalaby MM, Tawfik WA. Efficacy of some essential oils on cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Plant Prot Pathol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2018.44074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. El-Hawary FM, Abd E-S. Effect of neem and antitranspirant products against Aphis craccivora Koch and its biology. Egypt Acad J Biolog Sci. 2008. https://doi.org/10.21608/EAJBSA.2008.15750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shehawy AA. Comparative studies on the toxicity and biochemical efficacy of natural plant oils against Aphis craccivora KOCH (Hemiptera). J Plant Prot Pathol. 2015;6(9):1201–11.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Adebisi O, Dolma SK, Verma PK, Singh B, Reddy SGE. Volatile, non-volatile composition and insecticidal activity of eupatorium adenophorum spreng against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) and aphid Aphis craccivora Koch. Toxin Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2018.1434795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Džamić AM, Soković MD, Ristić MS, Novaković M, Grujić-Jovanović S, Tešević V, Marin PD. Antifungal and antioxidant activity of Mentha longifolia (L.) Hudson (Lamiaceae) essential oil. Bot Serb. 2010;34(1):57–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to the National Institute for the Protection of Plants-Biskra and Mohamed Khider University as well as the director of the ONPCA, the ecoguards of the Gueltates d'Afilal ramsar site and all the conservation agents of the ONPCA.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Laboratory of Sciences and Environment: Bioresources, Geochemical-Physics, Legislation and socio-economic development (C1810200), University of Tamanrasset, 11039, Sersouf, 11000, Tamanrasset, Algeria

    Rayane Saıfı

  2. Biogeochemistry of Desert Environments Laboratory, Scientific and Technical Research Center in Physi-Cochemical Analysis, Department of Biological Sciences, Route de Ghardaia, Kasdi Merbah University, BP.511, 30000, Ouargla, Algeria

    Hadjer Saıfı

  3. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ondokuz Mayıs, Samsun, Turkey

    İzzet Akca & Ali Kaan Askın

  4. Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Department of Environment and Agronomy, Setif University, Mohamed Seddik Ben Yahia University, B.P. 98, Ouled Aissa, 18000, Jijel, Algeria

    Messaouda Benabadelkader

  5. Legal Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage Department, Ahaggar National Park Office (O.P.N.A), Tamanrasset, Algeria

    Mohammed Belghoul

Authors
  1. Rayane Saıfı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hadjer Saıfı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. İzzet Akca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Messaouda Benabadelkader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Kaan Askın
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohammed Belghoul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RS, HS, MB and BM participated in setting the work planning and executing the experimental work and, was provided plant extracts for study. RS, HS, MB and IA analyzed the all data (statistical analyses) in study. RS, IA and AKA are the contributors in writing the manuscript. AKA, HS, RS and IA revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Kaan Askın.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saıfı, R., Saıfı, H., Akca, İ. et al. Insecticidal and repellent effects of Mentha longifolia L. essential oil against Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 18 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00395-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00395-7

Keywords

  • Botanical insecticide
  • Essential oil
  • Toxicity
  • Repellent
  • Aphid
  • Demographic parameters
  • Aphis craccivora
  • Mentha longifolia