Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Biocontrol of Lysobacter enzymogenes CQ18 against the tobacco powdery mildew fugus, Erysiphe cichoracearum

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 10, Article number: 74 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Powdery mildew is a common leaf disease of crops worldwide. A large quantity of chemical fungicides is used to control this disease in horticulture and agriculture, producing serious safety and environmental problems. To suppress this disease in safe and environment-friendly ways, the biocontrol of a self-isolated new strain of Lysobacter enzymogenes (CQ18) was studied against flue-cured tobacco powdery mildews.

Results

L. enzymogenes CQ18 produced chitinase, protease, β-1,3-glucanase, phosphatase, and siderophore, which may enable this biocontrol bacterium to degrade pathogen cell membranes and walls and deprive pathogens of iron. HPLC/MS analysis identified 14 antifungal metabolites present in L. enzymogenes CQ18 fermentation liquid (LEFL), which were grouped into organic acids, azoles, and pyrimidines. The variable targets in or on pathogen cells and combinative effects of these multiple metabolites may potently suppress the powdery mildew and be less likely to make Erysiphe cichoracearum develop resistance. LEFL was rich in L-pyroglutamate. Both LEFL and L-pyroglutamate inhibited the germination of E. cichoracearum conidia in vitro and reduced the powdery mildew index in the greenhouse and field. L-Pyroglutamate at a concentration of 0.50% achieved the same control efficacy as the chemical fungicide triadimefon (91–94%).

Conclusions

L. enzymogenes CQ18 and the metabolite L-pyroglutamate effectively controlled flue-cured tobacco powdery mildew. L. enzymogenes CQ18 grows rapidly and is resilient to adversity. L-Pyroglutamate has no toxicity to humans and is easy to synthesize at a low cost. Both show potential use in controlling plant powdery mildews.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Powdery mildew is a common and visible leaf disease worldwide, which causes great yield and economic losses every year in agriculture and horticulture [1, 2]. Due to repeated incidences within a crop growing season, a large quantity of chemical fungicides has to be frequently used to control this disease [3, 4]. As a result, the pathogens easily develop resistance to chemical fungicides, leading to low control efficacy or failure of the fungicides [5, 6]. The continuous development of new fungicides is necessary to effectively control powdery mildews. However, it often takes a long time for scientists to develop new chemical fungicides. The frequent use of chemical fungicides in large quantities also produces serious environmental and food safety problems.

Biological control is safe for humans and friendly to environments, which provides a new alternative to control crop powdery mildew. For example, Bacillus subtilis suppressed lettuce powdery mildew incited by Podosphaera fusca [7]. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, an endophyte bacterium, had a broad antimicrobial spectrum with high biocontrol efficacy, enhanced the ability of tobacco plants to resist powdery mildews, and thus greatly reduced the incidence of tobacco powdery mildews caused by Erysiphe cichoracearum [8,9,10,11]. Pseudomamma aphid is significantly inhibited the conidial germination of Podosphaera xanthii, a pathogen fungus that incites the powdery mildew of many plants by parasitism [12]. Similarly, Tilletiopsis pallescens, Simplicillium aogashimaense, and Trichothecium roseum significantly inhibited the growth and propagation of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. As a result, they impaired colony formation on wheat leaves and effectively suppressed wheat powdery mildews [13,14,15,16]. However, limited biocontrol microbes are used in powdery mildew management. It is necessary to discover more microbes effective in controlling this foliar disease.

Lysobacter spp., a Gram-negative bacterium with gliding motility, is ubiquitous in soil, sludge, and freshwater. Some members in this genus have long been studied for their ability to inhibit plant pathogens [17]. For instance, L. enzymogenes C3 can suppress many plant fungal diseases in both greenhouse and field experiments [18, 19]. Upon exposure to L. enzymogenes C3, nematode juveniles were quickly immobilized and then lysed within several days, indicating the production of toxins and extracellular lytic enzymes by this biocontrol bacterium [20]. L. enzymogenes 3.1T8 antagonized Pythium aphanidermatum due to the synthesis of polyketide synthase [21]. Chitinase, lipases, and protease produced by L. capsici PG4 are involved in the degradation of fungal cell membranes and walls, inhibiting the growth of many phytopathogen fungi [22]. As a result, L. capsici PG4 significantly decreased the incidence of tomato phytophthora rot in greenhouses. Taken together, some members of Lysobacter antagonize plant pathogens in many different ways, including the production of hydrolases, antimicrobial substances, and or the induction of plant defense response [20, 23, 24]. These studies rarely focus on crop powdery mildew. Evaluating the control efficacy of Lysobacter spp. against powdery mildew can provide farmers with safe and eco-friendly options in this disease management.

A self-isolated new strain of L. enzymogenes CQ18 showed potent inhibitory effects on a variety of culturable phytopathogen fungi in pure culture. However, whether this biocontrol bacterium can control powdery mildew is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (i) detect the fungal cell-wall-degrading hydrolases produced by this bacterium; (ii) identify the antifungal metabolites present in LEFL by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS), and (iii) evaluate the biocontrol efficacies of this bacterium and L-pyroglutamate (an antifungal metabolite present in LEFL) against flue-cured tobacco powdery mildew in both greenhouse and field.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strain

L. enzymogenes CQ18 (previously named the strain of HYP18, accession number in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center was MT377819) used in the current experiments was originally isolated from a purplish soil in 2018. After growing the bacteria on Luria–Bertani agar (LB) at 25 ℃ in the dark for 5 days, the bacteria were transferred to sterile deionized water and diluted to approximately 1 × 103 cells mL−1 as a liquid inoculant in the follow-up experiments.

Determination of extracellular lytic enzymes and siderophores

L. enzymogenes CQ18 was individually grown on the agar mediums containing colloidal chitin, skimmed milk powder, β-1,3-glucan, lecithin, and chrome azurol S at 25 °C for 3–5 days in the dark to determine the production of chitinase, protease, β-1,3-glucanase, phosphatase, and siderophores [25].

Detection of antimicrobial metabolites in LEFL

One mL of liquid inoculant (1 × 103 cells mL−1) was inoculated in a 1000-ml flask containing 500 mL of sterilized nutrient solution (NS; 5.0 g beef extract, 10.0 g peptone, 5.0 g NaCl, 1000 mL deionized water, pH 7.0) and then incubated at 25 °C with constant agitation at 150 rpm in the dark for 5 days in the dark. Twenty-five mL of LEFL was passed through a 0.22-μm film to remove bacterial cells and other solids. 25 mL cell-free LEFL was dried at − 18 ± 2 °C using a freezer (Haier, Qingdao, China). The residues were dissolved in 5.0 mL of 5% methanol for the detection of metabolites by HPLC/MS (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA) at Morjorbio Company, Shanghai, China.

The liquid chromatography was performed using a C18 analytical column ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (100 mm × 2.1 mm; Waters, Milford, USA) with 95% water + 5% acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid) and 47.5% acetonitrile + 47.5% isopropanol + 5% water (containing 0.1% formic acid) as mobile phase, respectively, at 0.4 mL min−1 of speed. The column temperature was 40 ℃ and 20 μL of samples were injected.

For MS analysis, an electron impact (EI) ionization source was used with an ion spray voltage 5500 V, capillary temperature 550 ℃, and a scan range of 35–500 m/z at a scanning interval of 0.30 s in the scan acquisition mode. N2 was used as the nebulizer, heater, curtain, and collision gas. An Abf Converter, MS-DIAL [26], Shimadzu offline software, and the Fiehn library were used for peak data processing (including raw extraction, identification, and area integration to remove metabolites less than threefold blank), baseline filtering and calibration, and deconvolution analysis [27]. Following are the setting parameters: 0.5 sigma window value, 5000 EI spectra cut-off, 0.5 min retention time tolerance, 0.5 Da m/z tolerance, 70% EI similarity cut-off, and 70% identification score cut-off. The alignment settings were: 0.075 min for retention time tolerance and 0.5 for the retention time factor [28]. The matched substances were retained based on a total similarity filter ≥ 800, fill ≥ 0.5%, fragment presence ≥ 800, and unmatched metabolites were removed. The metabolome analysis was performed using three replicate fermentation broths with the same conditions.

Conidial germination test

Conidia of E. cichoracearum were collected from naturally infected leaves of tobacco plants in a field and identified using conidial characteristics [29]. Source leaves were shaken 24 h before harvesting the conidia to dislodge old ones and ensure the inoculant with high viability. The conidia were collected from mildewed leaves in a sterile beaker by violently shaking. They were then immediately spread on the sterile agars containing the cell-free LEFL at the concentrations of 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mL L−1, respectively, and incubated at 25 °C for 24 h [10]. The purpose to use the cell-free LEFL in this investigation was to understand the inhibitory effect of hydrolases and antifungal metabolites against the germination of E. cichoracearum conidia and at the same time to avoid the interference during microscopic observation. There were triplicate plates for each LEFL concentration and the experiment was performed twice. After incubating the plates at 25 ℃ for 12 h in darkness, three 1× 1 cm agar pieces (the number of conidia on each piece ≥ 50) were randomly sampled from each plate for the observation of conidial germination using a light microscope (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) (Fig. 1). The length of the germ tube exceeding half of the short radius of the conidia was regarded as germinated. Germination rate (%) = (number of germinated conidia / total number of observed conidia) × 100%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microscope images of germinated Erysiphe cichoracearum conidia after 12 h of dark incubation on water agar plate

Full size image

HPLC/MS analysis found that the LEFL was rich in L-pyroglutamate. Some other L. enzymogenes stains can also produce this metabolite, which has been reported to have antifungal activity [30, 31]. Taking into account easy synthesis at low cost and non-toxicity to humans and animals [32], we further evaluated the influence of this metabolite on the conidial germination in the same way but using L-pyroglutamate (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 mg mL−1) instead of the LEFL.

Efficacy of LEFL and L-pyroglutamate against powdery mildew

Greenhouse test

During the growing season of flue-cured tobacco (var. K326), 45-day-old plant seedlings were grown from seeds in plastic pots (one seedling per pot) and arranged at random on the benches in a greenhouse with natural temperature and light at Zunyi Tobacco Company, China (27.79°N, 107.68°E). The autoclaved solution containing 0.1% agar and 0.0025% Tween-20 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was added to the beaker with conidia collected from tobacco leaves (see “Conidial germination test” section). This solution can well disperse the conidia and keep their viability for 4 h without an apparent decrease [33, 34]. The conidial inoculant (3 × 107 conidia mL−1) was sprayed onto the whole plant until runoff on each leaf. The inoculated plants were grown in the greenhouse until powdery mildew colonies became visible on the leaves (about a week after inoculation). Then, spray treatments, including deionized water, 1000-time-diluted triadimefon solution, LEFL (1 × 1010 cells mL−1), and aqueous solutions containing L-pyroglutamate at the concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, and 0.50% (all of them contained 0.01% of Tween 20), were applied on whole plants like the conidial inoculation [8, 35]. The experiment was carried out twice using a complete random design with four replicates for each treatment (10 pots per replicate). The colonies on each plant were counted before and after the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of spray treatments. The colony counts of each plant were summed for data analysis.

Field experiment

Field experiments were carried out at Zunyi on June 5–17, 2021, and June 15–27, 2022 in tobacco (var. K326) fields (27.78°N, 107.66°E). The local climate is dominated by the Pacific monsoon with a mean annual temperature of 18 °C (6 °C in January–34 °C in August), a mean annual rainfall of 1400 mm (approximately 80% of the rainfall is received in April–August), and a mean annual sunshine of 1147 h. When powdery mildew colonies were visible on the leaves, spray treatments (i.e., CK, triadimefon, LEFL, and L-pyroglutamate at a concentration of 0.50%) were applied as described in the greenhouse test. The experimental plots (7× 7 m) were randomly arranged with four replicates for each treatment. There were 73 tobacco plants in each plot.

Disease severities were daily rated for 10 consecutive days on a 0 to 9 scale, where 0 = no infection, 1 = 1–5%, 3 = 6–10%, 5 = 11–20%, 7 = 21–40%, 9 > 40% leaf area infected by powdery mildew [36]. Disease index = \(\frac{\Sigma\,disease\,scale \times number\,of\,corresponding\,leaves}{maximum\,disease\,scale \times total\,number\,of\,leaves}\)× 100 [37]. Disease control efficacy (%) = \(\frac{disease\,index\,of\,control-disease\,index \,of\,treatment}{disease\,index\,of\,control}\)  × 100 [38].

Data treatment

The data shown in this paper were the averages of two experiments, including in vitro conidial germination and disease control experiments in the greenhouse and field. SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze one-way variance (ANOVA) of treatment effects on conidial germination rate in vitro, and two-way variance on the colony counts in the greenhouse and disease index and control efficacy in the field. Differences at the level of P ≤ 0.05 in the least significant difference (LSD) test were considered significant.

Results

Lytic enzyme and siderophore productions

When L. enzymogenes CQ18 was grown on the agar plates individually containing colloidal chitin, skimmed milk powder, β-1,3-glucan, lecithin, and chrome azurol S, clear or colorful halos were observed surrounding the bacterial colonies (Fig. 2). So, the bacteria produced chitinase, protease, glucanase, phosphatase, and siderophores.

Fig. 2
figure 2

L. enzymogenes CQ18 was individually grown on the agar mediums containing lecithin, skimmed milk powder, colloidal chitin, β-1,3-glucan, and chrome azurol S at 25 °C (A lecithin; B skimmed milk powder; C colloidal chitin; D β-1,3-glucan; E chrome azurol S)

Full size image

Antifungal metabolites present in LEFL

HPLC/MS analysis identified 14 antifungal metabolites present in LEFL, which were attributed to organic acids, azoles, and pyrimidines (Table 1). Organic acids included L-pyroglutamate, N-ribosylhistidine, N-undecylbenzenesulfonic acid, gentisic acid, 4-formylsalicylic acid, P-salicylic acid, hexyl salicylic acid, 13-oxo-9,11-tridecadienoic acid, 12-oxo-2,3-dinor-10,15-phytodienoic acid, 11-eicosenoic acid, and 4-(3-pyridyl)-3-butenoic acid. Nanaomycin belonged to azoles. Thymine, 3'-amino-3'-deoxythymidine, cytosine, and N-formyl-4-amino-5-aminomethyl-2-methylpyrimidine were attributed to pyrimidines. Among these soluble metabolites, L-pyroglutamate is noteworthy due to its high concentration in the LEFL, easy synthesis at a low cost, and non-toxic to humans and animals.

Table 1 Antifungal metabolites detected in the L. enzymogenes CQ18 fermentation liquid
Full size table

Antagonisms of LEFL and L-pyroglutamate against conidial germination

The rate of conidial germination on the agar plates logarithmically decreased with the concentrations of LEFL (y = − 44.7ln (x) + 18.78, n = 6, r2 = 0.953**) and L-pyroglutamate (y = − 9.371ln (x) + 5.655, n = 6, r2 = 0.921**; Table 2). The germination rate of E. cichoracearum conidia was 69.53% on the control agar and decreased to 2.10% with LEFL at a concentration of 32 mL L−1 and 0.35% with L-pyroglutamate at 16 mg L−1. Based on the virulent equations established, the half inhibitory concentration against conidial germination (IC50) was 5.13 mL L−1 for LEFL and 1.07 mg L−1 for L-pyroglutamate.

Table 2 Influence of L. enzymogenes CQ18 fermentation liquid and L-pyroglutamate on the germination of E. cichoracearum conidia
Full size table

Efficacy of LEFL and L-pyroglutamate against tobacco powdery mildew in the greenhouse

The number of mildew colonies on the tobacco leaves varied in the sequence: CK > 0.125% L-pyroglutamate > LEFL > triadimefon and 0.25% L-pyroglutamate (no significant difference between triadimefon and 0.25% L-pyroglutamate) > 0.50% L-pyroglutamate (Table 3). Moreover, the number of mildew colonies in the water and 0.125% L-pyroglutamate spray treatments increased with time but changed little, if any at all, in the other spray treatments (including L-pyroglutamate at concentrations of 0.25% and 0.5%, LEFL, and triadimefon) within the 7-day observation period.

Table 3 Effects of foliar spray treatments on the number of colonies of powdery mildew on flue-cured tobacco leaves (no. per plant) in the greenhouse
Full size table

Efficacy of LEFL and L-pyroglutamate against plant powdery mildews in the field

The mean disease index of powdery mildew was highest in the water spray control (24.30 ± 11.47), followed by LEFL (6.58 ± 3.37), and lowest with triadimefon and L-pyroglutamate (3.69 ± 3.35 and 3.45 ± 3.41, respectively; Fig. 3A). The disease indexes increased with time in the water spray control but changed little in the spray treatments of triadimefon, LEFL, and L-pyroglutamate during the 10-day observation period. As a result, the means control efficacy was 91.04 ± 2.92% for triadimefon and 92.12 ± 2.93% for L-pyroglutamate achieved (no significant difference between these two treatments), which were significantly higher than LEFL (78.66 ± 4.79%; Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The control efficacies of triadimefon, L. enzymogenes CQ18 fermentation liquid (LEFL), and L-pyroglutamate against tobacco powdery mildew in the field. ** above the lines represent significant differences (P < 0.01). NS represent no significant differences (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Inhibitory effect of L. enzymogenes CQ18 against tobacco powdery mildew

Lysobacter species suppressed many plant diseases incited by bacteria, fungi, and nematodes [39,40,41]. Herein, LEFL (L. enzymogenes CQ18 fermentation liquid) greatly inhibited conidial germination and controlled powdery mildews of flue-cured tobacco in both greenhouse and fields although it was not as efficient as triadimefon, the chemical fungicide widely used to treat powdery mildews in the local area. It was worthwhile to further understand the mechanisms of this biocontrol bacterium employed in suppressing this foliar disease.

Production of extracellular enzymes and siderophore by L. enzymogenes CQ18

L. enzymogenes CQ18, like other Lysobacter species, produced extracellular chitinase, β-1,3 glucanase, phosphatase, and protease on agar plates. If the phenomena occur when contacting with powdery mildew colonies, the bacteria may degrade the pathogen cell membranes and walls. A similar antifungal mechanism was also employed by L. enzymogenes C3 and 3.1T8 against Fusarium graminearum, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Didymella lycopersici, Cladosporium fulvum, Corynespora cassiicola, Verticillium albo-atrum, and Phytophthora capsici [18, 21]. In addition, L. enzymogenes CQ18 produced siderophores, which may deprive the pathogen of iron inhibiting mycelial growth [42]. The presence of iron in cells may also induce L. enzymogenes CQ18 to synthesize antibiotic compounds because Fe3+ is a cofactor of some antimicrobial proteins involved in the inhibition of pathogens [43].

Antifungal metabolites present in LEFL (L. enzymogenes CQ18)

LEFL was rich in antifungal metabolites, which was consistent with other L. enzymogenes strains [44]. The antifungal metabolites produced by this bacterium were attributed to organic acids, quinone, and pyrimidines. Although these metabolites identified by HPLC/MS are not novel, they greatly varied in antifungal activities (including interference with cell membrane synthesis, protein denature, mycelial growth inhibition, plant defense induction, etc.) and the targets on or in pathogen cells. For example, eicosanoids in the organic acid group can damage fungal cell membranes, leading to the leakage of cell inclusions [45]. Quinone blocks the biosynthesis of ergosterols, an important component of fungal cell membranes [46]. Upon exposure to pyrimidines, protein biosynthesis in fungal pathogen cells is inhibited [47]. The organic acids, such as gentisic acid, N-ribosylhistidine, and N-undecylbenzenesulfonic acid detected in LEFL slowed hyphal growth by multiple mechanisms [48]. Salicylic acids can effectively inhibit fungal growth at low concentrations and kill the pathogen fungi at higher concentrations [49]. Da Rocha Neto et al. (2015) reported that the solution containing salicylic acid in vitro inhibited the germination of P. expansum spores and reduced the incidence of blue mold on apple leaves even at low concentrations [50]. Apart from an effective inhibitory effect on fungal growth, salicylic acid is also an important hormone in flowering plants, which is synthesized in either the cinnamic acid or the chorismate pathways [51]. The most well-known role of this plant hormone is to induce plant defense responses [52]. The underlying mechanisms were owing to the deposition of callose plugs (reinforce plant cell walls), the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins (induce toxicity in microbes upon contact), and the synthesis of hydrogen peroxide (initiate hypersensitive responses). Thus, the variable targets and combinative effects of multiple metabolites produced by L. enzymogenes CQ18 may be beneficial to effectively suppressing tobacco powdery mildew and decreasing the probability of pathogens developing resistance.

Inhibitory effect of L-pyroglutamate against tobacco powdery mildew

Like some other L. enzymogenes strains and biocontrol bacteria [31], L. enzymogenes CQ18 produced L-pyroglutamate (also named 5-oxoproline, 5-oxopyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid, L-5-pyrrolidone-2-carboxylic acid or (S)-(-)-2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid). This metabolite showed antagonistic activity against many phytopathogen fungi such Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Plasmopara viticola, Phytophthora infestans, Phytophthora capsici Leonian, Phytophthora infestans, and Candida spp. [53, 54]. Taking into account the addition to cosmetics in a large quantity for moisturizing and whitening the skin, L-pyroglutamate would thus be safe for humans and animals. Therefore, we further investigated the antagonism of this metabolite against the germination of E. cichoracearum conidia in vitro and the suppression against flue-cured tobacco powdery mildew in both the greenhouse and the field. The IC50 (half inhibitory concentration) of L-pyroglutamate against the conidial germination was 1.07 mg L−1, which should be much higher than LEFL (IC50 = 5.13 mL L−1) if calculated as the dry weight of active ingredients. The coexistence of multiple antifungal ingredients could make the LEFL effectively inhibit the germination of the pathogen conidia. However, tobacco powdery mildew was also effectively suppressed by increasing the concentration of L-pyroglutamate. Subsequently, L-pyroglutamate at a concentration of 0.5% achieved a control efficacy similar to 1000-time-diluted triadimefon.

L-Pyroglutamate is often synthesized from 2 L-glutamate molecules by removing a water molecule at 140–150 °C:

figure a

Therefore, L-pyroglutamate is easy to synthesize at a low cost. The complex of L-pyroglutamate with copper or zinc is more toxic to phytopathogen cells [53]. Microbial secondary metabolites are important sources of antibiotics, pharmaceuticals, and insecticides. According to statistics, at least 70% of current medical drugs come from secondary metabolites and their derivatives of microorganisms [55]. L-Pyroglutamate and its derivatives may thus be worthwhile to develop as new fungicides.

Conclusion

L. enzymogenes CQ18 and its metabolite L-pyroglutamate inhibited the germination of E. cichoracearum conidia and suppressed the powdery mildew of flue-cured tobacco in both the greenhouse and the field. L-pyroglutamate at a proper concentration achieved the same control efficacy as the chemical fungicide triadimefon. The underlying mechanisms employed by L. enzymogenes CQ18 in suppressing the powdery mildews could be the production of hydrolases, siderophores, and antifungal metabolites. Our study provided promising use of L. enzymogenes CQ18 and L-pyroglutamate in controlling powdery mildews.

References

  1. Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. Bacterial seed endophytes of domesticated cucurbits antagonize fungal and oomycete pathogens including powdery mildew. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh RS. Plant diseases. Oxford: IBH Publishing; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilardi G, Baudino M, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML. Efficacy of biocontrol agents and natural compounds against powdery mildew of zucchini. Phytoparasitica. 2012;40:147–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moyer CAPN. Evaluation of biofungicides for control of powdery mildew of gerbera daisy. Proc Florida State Hortic Soc. 2008;121:389–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Ortuño D, Pérez-García A, López-Ruiz F, Romero D, de Vicente A, Torés JA. Occurrence and distribution of resistance to QoI fungicides in populations of Podosphaera fusca in south central Spain. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2006;115:215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrath MT. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and challenges. Plant Dis. 2001;85:236–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening J, Arrebola E, et al. The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20:430–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiao R, Cai Y, He P, Munir S, Li X, Wu Y, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YN201732 produces lipopeptides with promising biocontrol activity against fungal pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan Z, Munir S, Li Y, He P, He P, Wu Y, et al. Deciphering the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B9601–Y2 as a potential antagonist of tobacco leaf mildew pathogen during flue-curing. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiao R, Ahmed A, He P, Munir S, Wu Y, Wang J, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens induces resistance in tobacco against powdery mildew pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10922-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gafni A, Calderon CE, Harris R, Buxdorf K, Dafa-Berger A, Zeilinger-Reichert E, et al. Biological control of the cucurbit powdery mildew pathogen Podosphaera xanthii by means of the epiphytic fungus Pseudozyma aphidis and parasitism as a mode of action. Front Plant Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu JJ. Identification and characterization of autolysis-related genes in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohl J, de Geijn HG, Haas LG, Henken B, Hauschild R, Hilscher U, et al. Stepwise screening of candidate antagonists for biological control of Blumeria graminis f sp. tritici. Biol Control. 2019;136:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu M, Duan X, Cai P, Li Y, Qiu Z. Deciphering the genome of Simplicillium aogashimaense to understand its mechanisms against the wheat powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathol Res. 2022;4:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu M, Duan X, Cai P, Zhang W, Liu Y, Cui J, et al. Biocontrol action of T. richothecium roseum against the wheat powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;6:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu M, Duan X, Cai P, Qiu Z, Li Z. Genome sequence resource of Trichothecium roseum (ZM-Tr2021), the causal agent of postharvest pink rot. Plant Dis. 2023;107:5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen PACF. Lysobacter, a new genus of nonfruiting, gliding bacteria with a high base ratio. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1978;28:367–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jochum CC, Osborne LE, Yuen GY. Fusarium head blight biological control with Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3. Biol Control. 2006;39:336–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuen G, Zhang Z. Control of brown patch disease using the bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 and culture fluid. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J. 2001;9:742–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Z, Yuen GY, Sarath G, Penheiter AR. Chitinases from the plant disease biocontrol agent, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia C3. Phytopathology. 2001;91:204–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Folman LB, Postma J, van Veen JA. Characterisation of Lysobacter enzymogenes (Christensen and Cook 1978) strain 3.1T8, a powerful antagonist of fungal diseases of cucumber. Microbiol Res. 2003;158:107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Puopolo GRAZ. Identification and characterization of Lysobacter capsici strain PG4: a new plant health-promoting rhizobacterium. J Plant Pathol. 2010;92:157–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Palumbo JD, Sullivan RF, Kobayashi DY. Molecular characterization and expression in Escherichia coli of three beta-1,3-glucanase genes from Lysobacter enzymogenes strain N4–7. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:4362–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Yuen GY. The role of chitinase production by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 in biological control of Bipolaris sorokiniana. Phytopathology. 2000;90:384–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Louden BC, Haarmann D, Lynne AM. Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011;12:51–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsugawa H, Cajka T, Kind T, Ma Y, Higgins B, Ikeda K, et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat Methods. 2015;12:523–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kind T, Wohlgemuth G, Lee DY, Lu Y, Palazoglu M, Shahbaz S, et al. FiehnLib: mass spectral and retention index libraries for metabolomics based on quadrupole and time-of-flight gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81:10038–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadiq FA, Yan B, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W. Untargeted metabolomics reveals metabolic state of Bifidobacterium bifidum in the biofilm and planktonic states. LWT. 2020;118: 108772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook RTA, Braun U. Conidial germination patterns in powdery mildews. Mycol Res. 2009;113:616–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun M, Han L, Li A, Zhu X, Wu W, Zhang J. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel l-pyroglutamic acid derivatives as potent antifungal agents. Chem Nat Compd. 2021;57:1081–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Im H, Moon J, Kim W. Antibacterial activity of supernatant obtained from Weissella koreensis and Lactobacillus sakei on the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Korean J Agric Sci. 2016;43:415–23.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elam R. Morphological changes in adult males from resistance exercise and amino acid supplementation. J Sports Med Phys Fittness. 1988;28:35–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maia GS. Isolation, identification and characterization of cucurbit powdery mildew in North Central Florida Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida; 2012.

  34. Azmat MA, Khan AA, Cheema HMN, Ashraf M, Niaz S. Detached leaf assay coupled with microscopic conidial quantification: an efficient screening method for powdery mildew resistance in pea. Int J Agric Biol. 2013;15:6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Menzies J, Bowen P, Ehret D, Glass ADM. Foliar applications of potassium silicate reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucchini squash. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1992;117:902–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu W, Wu F, Chang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Effects of wheat as companion cropping on growth, soil enzymes and disease resistance of watermelon. Allelopathy J. 2013;32:267.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liang YC, Sun WC, Si J, Romheld V. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the enhancement of induced resistance to powdery mildew in Cucumis sativus. Plant Pathol. 2005;54:678–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Meng X, Yu J, Yu M, Yin X, Liu Y. Dry flowable formulations of antagonistic Bacillus subtilis strain T429 by spray drying to control rice blast disease. Biol Control. 2015;85:46–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang Y, Hu B, Liu F. Selection and identification of antagonistic bacteria against soil-borne plant pathogens. Chinese J Biol Control. 2005;21:54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou L, Yue G, Wang Y. Evaluation of bacterial biological control agents for control of root-knot nematode disease on tomato. Crop Prot. 2005;84:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen D, Yang H, Huan J, Yuan L. Lysobacter enzymogenes LE16 autolysates have potential as biocontrol agents-Lysobacter sp. autolysates as biofungicide. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;85:46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng J, Xu T, Cao L, Tong C, Zhang X, Luo D, et al. The role of iron competition in the antagonistic action of the rice endophyte Streptomyces sporocinereus OsiSh-2 against the pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Microb Ecol. 2018;76:1021–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ezraty B, Barras F. The “liaisons dangereuses” between iron and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:418–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang B, Laborda P, Sun C, Xu G, Zhao Y, Liu F. Improving the production of a novel antifungal alteramide B in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11 by strengthening metabolic flux and precursor supply. Bioresour Technol. 2019;273:196–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bito LZ. Eicosanoid transport systems: mechanisms, physiological roles, and inhibitors, CRC Handbook of Eicosanoids: prostaglandins and related lipids, CRC Press; 2017. pp. 211–232.

  46. Long N, Xu X, Zeng Q, Sang H, Lu L. Erg4A and Erg4B are required for conidiation and azole resistance via regulation of ergosterol biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02924-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Garavito MF, Narvaez-Ortiz HY, Zimmermann BH. Pyrimidine metabolism: dynamic and versatile pathways in pathogens and cellular development. J Genet Genomics. 2015;42:195–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kalaichelvan P, Mahadevan A. Effects on phenolic prohibitins from groundnut on fungi. Curr Sci. 1988;54:193–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Forchetti G, Masciarelli O, Izaguirre MJ, Alemano S, Alvarez D, Abdala G. Endophytic bacteria improve seedling growth of sunflower under water stress, produce salicylic acid, and inhibit growth of pathogenic fungi. Curr Microbiol. 2010;61:485–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Da Rocha Neto AC, Maraschin M, Di Piero RM. Antifungal activity of salicylic acid against Penicillium expansum and its possible mechanisms of action. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;215:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Métraux J. Recent breakthroughs in the study of salicylic acid biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:332–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ding PT, Ding YL. Stories of salicylic acid: a plant defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:549–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gang F, Zhu F, Li X, Wei J, Wu W, Zhang J. Synthesis and bioactivities evaluation of L-pyroglutamic acid analogues from natural product lead. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;26:4644–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. de Souza-Melo WO, Figueiredo E, Freire J, Costa B, Lira A, Freires I, et al. Phytochemistry, antifungal and antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity of Byrsonima gardneriana (A. Juss) extract. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;123:104994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod. 2012;75:311–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim JH, Campbell BC, Mahoney N, Chan KL, Molyneux RJ, May GS. Enhancement of fludioxonil fungicidal activity by disrupting cellular glutathione homeostasis with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;270:284–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bellés JM, Garro R, Fayos J, Navarro P, Primo J, Conejero V. Gentisic acid as a pathogen-inducible signal, additional to salicylic acid for activation of plant defenses in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1999;12:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Janda T, Szalai G, Pál M. Salicylic acid signalling in plants. Int Journal Mol Sci. 2020;21:2655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tahara S, Kasai S, Inoue M, Kawabata J, Mizutani J. Identification of mucondialdehyde as a novel stress metabolite. Experientia. 1994;50:137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang K, Borrego EJ, Kenerley CM, Kolomiets MV. Oxylipins other than jasmonic acid are xylem-resident signals regulating systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma virens in Maize. Plant Cell. 2020;32:166–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee JY, Lee JY, Jung HW, Hwang BK. Streptomyces koyangensis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete that produces 4-phenyl-3-butenoic acid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nakashima T, Kimura T, Miyano R, Matsuo H, Hirose T, Kimishima A, et al. Nanaomycin H: a new nanaomycin analog. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017;123:765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu W, Jiang Y, Fei Q, Du H. Synthesis and fungicidal activity of novel 1,2,4-triazole derivatives containing a pyrimidine moiety. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem. 2019;194:1171–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lin TS, Zhou RX, Scanlon KJ, Brubaker WF, Lee JJS, Woods K, et al. Synthesis and biological activity of several aminonucleoside–platinum(II) complexes. J Med Chem. 1986;29:681–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was financially supported by Guizhou Provincial Tobacco Company Zunyi Branch (2018-01). We thank the editor and the reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hongjun Yang and Liyuan Peng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Hongjun Yang, Liyuan Peng & Jianguo Huang

  2. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China

    Liyuan Peng

  3. Guizhou Provincial Tobacco Company Zunyi Branch, Zunyi, 563000, China

    Zhimo Li & Chunyang Huang

Authors
  1. Hongjun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liyuan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhimo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunyang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianguo Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HY: investigation, data curation, carried out the experiments, writing—original draft, validation. LP: greenhouse experiments, data collection and statistical analysis, writing—original draft. ZL: field investigation and experiments. CH: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation. JH: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunyang Huang or Jianguo Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Peng, L., Li, Z. et al. Biocontrol of Lysobacter enzymogenes CQ18 against the tobacco powdery mildew fugus, Erysiphe cichoracearum. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00436-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00436-1

Keywords