Skip to main content

Deriving the Shannon Index from the soil molecular Humeome serves as a descriptor of soil organic matter stability under different cropping systems

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) is essential in maintaining soil structure, nutrient content, water retention, and biodiversity. It also represents an important C pool that, if efficiently stabilized, may play a role in the mitigation of global climate changes. However, knowledge is still limited on the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) molecular composition occurring with changes in land use and management practices. We calculated the Shannon diversity index (SH) for the soil molecular characteristics as obtained by the humeomic sequential fractionation applied on two different soil systems including uncultivated control: (1) Soils under a short-term cultivation of maize for 1 and 3 years; (2) Soils under a 20-year long-term cultivation of either continuous maize (MAIZE) or maize-bean rotation (MIX). The SH values were derived for each of the nine molecular classes in which the soil humeomic results were grouped. When single class SH were summed, we found that the resulting total Shannon heterogeneity (SHtot) and its value weighted for the relative OC percent, were inversely proportional to a Stability Soil Organic Matter Ratio (SOMR) equation, that, in turn, was directly proportional to the normalized Chemical Protection Ratio (nCPR) equation, based on the quantity of highly hydrophobic (organosoluble) compounds present in soils. The physical–chemical stability of SOM, expressed as SOMR and nCPR, increased with the decrease of the heterogeneity of the total molecular system (SHtot) for both short- and long-term soil systems. In fact, in the short-term soil system the molecular humeome was least heterogeneous under uncropped conditions, while SH showed increased heterogeneity with Maize cultivation for 1 and 3 years, in the order. The greatest SH homogeneity was again shown by the uncultivated control soil for the 20-year long-term system, and SH heterogeneity increased passing from the soil under Maize-Broad bean rotation, to that under Maize monocultivation. The SH values of single molecular classes revealed that nitrogenated or oxygenated aromatic compounds determined the stability of soil humus, being the nitrogenated heterocyclic compounds responsible for the residual molecular stability of SOM in both soil systems. This work indicated that the molecular complexity of a soil humeome can be represented by a Shannon descriptor that provides a handy and direct information on the dynamics of humus in soils.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Soil is an essential body of the terrestrial ecosystem possessing highly complex physical structures, chemical composition, and biodiversity [1]. The most chemically heterogeneous soil component is soil humus or soil organic matter (SOM) that is the end product of the microbial decomposition of plant litter and animal tissues [2] and is mainly responsible for soil aggregation, water holding capacity, plant nutrient bioavailability, and long-term carbon storage [3]. The capacity to advance in the management of soil humus would represent a giant leap towards a modern sustainable agriculture, since it would allow to control soil erosion and desertification, reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and limit the emissions of greenhouse gases [4].

However, to achieve these technological goals, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the dynamics of soil humus, by increasing our knowledge on its molecular composition and structural assembly. A consensus has been recently reached in viewing humus as a supramolecular association of a large number of heterogeneous and relatively small molecules which self-assembly due to Van der Walls, \(\pi-\pi\), CH–π, and hydrogen bonds [4,5,6,7]. Based on this understanding, it was devised a novel chemical fractionation technique of humus, called Humeomic, to obtain more homogeneous humus fractions and facilitate the identification of their molecular composition [8, 9]. The Humeomic fractionation, involves a gradual removal of compounds from the humus matrix by breaking progressively stronger bonds, such as ester and ether bonds, without breaking carbon–carbon bonds [8] and determine their molecular structure by advanced instrumentation such as NMR and mass spectrometry [10,11,12]. Humeomics was successfully applied on soils to identify, in a tilled agricultural soil, 2.35 times more Organic Carbon (OC) than that extracted by the common alkaline extraction [13]. Moreover, the OC content of the Humeomic fractions was used to calculate an index related to the physicochemical protection of soil organic matter called Chemical Protection Ratio (CPR) [4]. In fact, the humus hydrophobic domains were found to protect the hydrophilic components from mineralization and microbial degradation [14, 15]. Since the greater the organosoluble/hydrosoluble carbon ratio of the soil humeome, the larger appeared the chemical protection of SOM and its stability [4], it became clear that a further understanding on the stability of soil humus should include a comprehensive knowledge on the homogeneity/heterogeneity of its molecular components.

Among the indices used by the scientific community in the fields of ecology and biology, the Shannon index, or species diversity SH index seems the most applied [16] since it usefully assesses the diversity and dynamics of microbial communities [17, 18]. For example, SH was used to evaluate changes of microbiota during leaf litter decomposition of Quercus Wutaishanica Forest [19,20,21]. A clear seasonal succession for litter bacterial diversity during decomposition of Quercus Wutaishanica leaves litter was shown by the species diversity index SH, that resulted significantly lower in summer than in other seasons, while the difference between fall, winter and spring was not significant [20].

The Shannon index is useful because it converts into a single value a large amount of data from different samples, which would otherwise be very difficult to compare [22]. Due to the large heterogeneity of components in the supramolecular structure of humus [23], the SH index may allow to reduce the complex variation of different classes of humic molecules and reach a clearer picture of their dynamics in soil. The Shannon index has already been used by Jiménez-González et al., to estimate the pyrolytic heterogeneity of molecular classes present in soil [24]. This study showed significant correlations between the progressive molecular diversity of methoxyphenolic associations and the concentration of organic carbon stored in the corresponding soils. Another work focused on the n-alkanes released by pyrolysis-GC–MS from 35 widely different Mediterranean soils [25]. The SH index was calculated to evaluate the origin and transformations of the homologous series of alkanes (C9–C31) and a series of multivariate data treatments enabled to show a significant relationship between alkane diversity and SOC concentration. By this method, it was found that the increase in alkane diversity was related to the increase of SOC content and to the resistance of SOM to biodegradation [26]. The SH index has been also applied to the molecular components, as determined by FTICR-MS, of humic and fulvic acids extracted from soils managed for 19 years by either traditional tillage or reduced tillage [27]. Results showed enhanced diversity and chemical richness in the humic extracts composition under reduced tillage.

The aim of this study was to apply the Shannon index to the molecular characteristics of the entire humeome and evaluate the molecular stability of organic matter in soils under different land use and management. We hypothesized that a more stable soil humus system may consist of more homogeneous components in the soil humeome.

Methods

Soil

A Typic Ustifluvent (63% sand, 30% silt and 7% clay classified as a sandy loam soil with pH 8) under continuous Maize (Zea mais L.) in the experimental station of the University of Torino [13] was used for the short-term cultivation experiment with three samplings at a depth of 0–30 cm deep: (i) uncultivated control soil (Initial Control); (ii) soil after one year of cultivation (MAIZE 1); (iii) soil after three years of cultivation (MAIZE 3). Details on land management and sampling times are reported in [28].

The long-term cultivation experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of the University of Napoli Federico II at Castel Volturno, on a Vertic Xerofluvent (18.3% sand, 31.3% silt, and 50.4% clay classified as a silty-clay loam soil with pH 8.3) with sampling at a depth of 20 cm deep. This soil was permanently managed under three different cropping systems for 20 years: (i) untilled control soil without cultivation (Control); (ii) Maize monoculture (MAIZE); (iii) Maize-Broad bean (Vicia faba L.) rotation (MIX). Details are reported in [29].

Humeomics sequential fractionation

The Humeomics fractionation was applied to the soils of the two different management systems, as previously described [13, 28, 29], to obtain a series of organosoluble and hydrosoluble separated fractions: unbound fraction (ORG1), weakly ester-bound fractions (ORG2 and AQU2), strongly ester-bound fractions (ORG3 and AQU3), strongly ether-bound fraction (AQU4), and extraction from the final residual soil to obtain further hydrosoluble (RESOM) and organosoluble (RESORG) fractions (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Humeomics sequential fractionation protocol applied directly in Soil

Fractions characterization

The organosoluble fractions (ORG 1–3 & RESORG) were analyzed by GC–MS, while the molecular composition of hydrosoluble fractions (AQU 2–4 & RESOM) was characterized by High Resolution ESI-Orbitrap-MS [13, 28, 29]. The identified molecules were grouped in nine main groups: organic nitrogen compounds such as (i) aminoacids, amines and imines (AA/AM/IM), (ii) amides (AD), and, (iii) heterocyclic nitrogen compounds (HN); aromatic compounds comprising (iv) phenolic acids, phenolic esters/ethers and phenols (PA/PE/PH), and, (v) benzoic acids, benzoic esters/ethers, heterocyclic oxygen compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (BA/BE/HO/PAH); (vi) resin acids, steroids and sterols (RA/SE/ST); aliphatic acids such as (vii) fatty, dicarboxylic and hydroxyl acids (FA/DA/HA); sugar derivatives including (viii) sugar acids, sugar esters/ethers, and sugars (SA/SET/SU); and other aliphatic compounds such as (ix) esters, ethers, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes and alkanes/alkenes/alkynes (ES/ET/KE/AC/AH/AL). The Shannon index was applied to the concentrations of identified molecules grouped into these molecular classes to obtain a single number that would represent an indication of molecular diversity among the groups’ compounds of each considered soil system and practice.

Shannon Index

The Shannon index is usually used to measure the diversity of species in a microbial community in eco-biological studies [30,31,32]. This index is indicated with SH and is calculated from the expression:

$$SH = - \sum \left[ {\left( {p_i } \right) \times \ln \left( {p_i } \right)} \right]$$
(1)

where pi is the summation from i = 1 to i = n of the relative quantity of i species in a whole community, multiplied by the natural logarithm of the same quantity and changed in sign. This SH index is directly proportional to the number of species and the uniformity of their abundance. The minimum value is 0 when only one species is present within the community, whereas the maximum value is equal to ln (k) where k is the number of species, i.e., there are k species with the same number of individuals.

To derive the Shannon index from the molecular classes of a soil humeome, we substituted biological species with molecular classes, and individuals with concentrations of single molecules belonging to a specific molecular class. We calculated the species diversity as an SH index by the Past 4.11 free software with biased version. In fact, if under-sampling is suspected, the actual number of species based on Shannon entropy controlled by bias is the most suitable measure of diversity [33]. In practice, SH was derived from the concentrations, expressed as percent of organic carbon, of the molecules found in the humeome of the studied soil systems [13, 28, 29], which were grouped into 9 main classes of compounds. The percent of organic carbon was calculated by dividing each molecular concentration by the total organic carbon extracted from soil through the Humeomic fractionation. The % OC of each molecule, belonging to the different compounds classes, was placed into the Past 4.11 software to calculate the Shannon index.

From Shannon index to stability organic matter ratio

A direct relationship between an enhanced molecular hydrophobicity and the organic matter protection was previously noted [4]. This relation was shown by the Chemical Protection Ratio (CPR) based on the ratio of the total OC found in all organosoluble fractions divided by the total OC found in all hydrosoluble fractions separated from soil by the Humeomic procedure:

$${\text{CPR}} = {\text{ORG}}_n /\left( {{\text{AQU}}_n + {\text{RESOM}}} \right)$$
(2)

In this study, we normalized this ratio (nCPR) by dividing the total OC found in all organosoluble fractions by the total OC found in all fractions separated from soil by the Humeomic procedure:

$${\text{nCPR}} = \left( {{\text{ORG}}_n + {\text{RESORG}}} \right)/\left( {{\text{ORG}}_n + {\text{RESORG}} + {\text{AQU}}_n + {\text{RESOM}}} \right)$$
(3)

The Shannon indices calculated by the Eq. (1) for each of the nine molecular classes obtained for any single soil of the two systems considered here, were combined to obtain the total Shannon index (SHtot) that indicates the overall heterogeneity of each soil molecular humeome.

The SHtot and nCPR were then used to introduce a new index named Stability Organic Matter Ratio (SOMR):

$${\text{SOMR }} = {\text{ nCPR }}/ \, ({\text{SH}}_{{\text{tot}}} \times \% {\text{OC}})$$
(4)

SOMR was, therefore, based on results of Humeomic fractionation of the different soil humeomes and concomitantly indicated both the heterogeneity and hydrophobicity of the molecular systems in soil humus. Equation 4 suggests that the soil stability is directly proportional to the content of hydrophobic molecules (nCPR), and inversely proportional to the sum of SH indices (SHtot).

Results and discussion

Soil system under short-term cultivation

The Shannon Index for the differently cropped soils of the short-term cultivation experiment (Fig. 1; Table 1) were derived from the data obtained by the humeomic fractionation previously applied to the soils [13, 28]. From the same data of soil humeomes [13, 28], the nCPR ratio derived here shows that the hydrophobicity of soil humus decreased with the extent of maize cultivation. In fact, the nCPR values diminished progressively passing from 0.511 of the control soil, to 0.427 and 0.369 of the soils under MAIZE1 and MAIZE3, respectively (Table 1). Here, the diversity SH values obtained for the nine molecular classes allowed to calculate the SHtot, that revealed, for the first time, that the heterogeneity of the molecular system in the soil humeome showed an opposite trend to the soil hydrophobicity, since it increased with the number of years of Maize cultivation (Table 1). The least heterogeneous system resulted the uncultivated control soil with a SHtot of 16.201, while 1.899 was the value when the SHtot heterogeneity was weighted on the percent of organic carbon in all molecular classes (SHtot × % OC). These two values increased to 17.757 and 2.082, respectively, for MAIZE1 and up to 20.044 and 2.489 for MAIZE3 (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Shannon (SH) Index derived from 9 molecular classes identified by soil humeomic fractionation applied to soils of the short-term experiment: uncropped (Control), under 1 year of Maize cultivation (Maize 1), and under 3 years of Maize cultivation (Maize 3). AA = amino acids; AM = amines; IM = imines; AD = amides; BA = benzoic acids; BE = benzoic esters; HO = heterocyclic oxygen compounds; PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PA = phenolic acids; PE = phenolic esters; PH = phenols; FA = fatty acids; DA = dicarboxylic acids; HA = hydroxy acids; ES = aliphatic esters; ET = ethers; KE = ketones; AC = alcohols; AH = aldehydes; AL = alkanes/alkenes/alkynes; RA = resin acids; SE = steroids; ST = sterols; SA = sugar acids; SET = sugar esters; SU = sugars; HN = heterocyclic nitrogen compounds

Table 1 Shannon index (SH), SH multiplied by the % OC in the specific molecular class, and their respective total values (SHtot) for all the molecular classes, derived from the molecular soil humeome for Control, Maize after 1 year (Maize 1) and 3 years cultivation (Maize 3) of the short-term experiment

Hence, a detailed molecular information given by the humeomic fractionation of soils allows to derive two indices of hydrophobicity and heterogeneity of soil humic molecules which are related to the overall molecular stability of SOM. These parameters indicate that soil organic matter becomes less stable, and therefore more prone to degradation/mineralization, when a decrease of its molecular hydrophobicity is concomitant to an increase of its molecular heterogeneity. A reduced molecular stability of SOM following a decline in the degree of humus hydrophobicity with soil perturbation due to tillage and cropping, had been already reported, albeit using physical–chemical results [34] or several indirect soil biological properties [35]. Moreover, the nCPR and the SHtot indices are combined here to obtain the SOMR index, whose values indicate the overall molecular stability of soil organic matter based on the molecular characteristics of soil humus. The values of SOMR, when applied to the soil system under short-term cultivation, suggest that the molecular stability of SOM continues to decrease with the number of years of Maize cultivation. In fact, SOMR was reduced from 0.269 of the uncultivated control soil to 0.205 and even 0.148 for the MAIZE1 and MAIZE3 cropped soils, respectively (Table 1). In fact, molecular stability of soil humus can be related to its hydrophobic properties which stabilize and accumulate heterogeneous organic molecules in soil because of a mechanism of physical–chemical protection [4, 14, 23] that excludes a large part of humic matter from biotic and abiotic oxidative degradation. Once soil humus undergoes oxidative processes that degrade its hydrophobicity (tillage, continuous cultivation, etc.), it also loses its molecular homogeneity, and, concomitantly, its molecular stability [14, 23].

The Shannon diversity index applied to the molecular results of the humeomic analysis of soils is also capable to indicate which single molecular class preferably contributes to changes of soil organic matter stability during soil cropping. In the case of the soil under the short-term experiment, amides (AD); phenolic acids, phenolic esters/ethers and phenols (PA/PE/PH); esters, ethers, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes and alkanes/alkenes/alkynes (ES/ET/KE/AC/AH/AL); and heterocyclic nitrogen compounds (HN), were the compounds classes which mostly determined SOM stability (Fig. 1). Their SH values, and, thus, their heterogeneity increased steadily passing from the uncropped control soil to MAIZE1 and MAIZE3 soils (Fig. 1). The PA/PE/PH molecular class, a product of lignin degradation in soil, and the ES/ET/KE/AC/AH/AL group of compounds provided a Shannon index that significantly increased with years of Maize cultivation (Fig. 1). In fact, while SH for PA/PE/PH molecular class passed from 1.649 of uncultivated soil to 2.69 and 2.954 for MAIZE1 and MAIZE3 soils, respectively, the ES/ET/KE/AC/AH/AL class of compounds provided SH values which increased from 1.992 to 2.846 and 2.828 for the same soil treatments of the short-term experiment (Fig. 1, Table 1). The concomitant heterogeneity enhancement of these molecular classes with reduction of the molecular stability of SOM is in line with previous reports [24, 36].

In the case of amides, the SH heterogeneity weighted by the OC percent, increased from 0.043 for the uncultivated control soil to 0.515 and 0.576 for the respective soils under 1 and 3 years of maize cultivation (Fig. 2; Table 1). A similar increase was observed for the HN compounds, whose weighted heterogeneity by OC percent increased to 0.553 and 0.656 for the MAIZE1 and MAIZE3 soils, respectively, as compared to 0.147 in the case of the uncultivated control soil (Fig. 2; Table 1). This trend of both AD and HN classes indicates that in a soil with increasing maize cultivation, the loss of SOM molecular stability is accompanied not only by a greater heterogeneity of these compound classes but also by their larger concentration. An implication of this dynamics for the amide class is that its resilience to the loss of molecular stability of SOM is concomitant to an enhanced degradation activity of soil microbes [37]. Similarly, a relationship between the heterogeneity and amount of HN in soils with a destabilization of soil organic matter has been already noted [38].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Shannon (SH) Index weighted for % OC in the nine molecular classes identified by soil humeomic fractionation applied to soils of the short-term experiment: uncropped (Control), under 1 year of Maize cultivation (Maize 1), and under 3 years of Maize cultivation (Maize 3). AA = amino acids; AM = amines; IM = imines; AD = amides; BA = benzoic acids; BE = benzoic esters; HO = heterocyclic oxygen compounds; PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PA = phenolic acids; PE = phenolic esters; PH = phenols; FA = fatty acids; DA = dicarboxylic acids; HA = hydroxy acids; ES = aliphatic esters; ET = ethers; KE = ketones; AC = alcohols; AH = aldehydes; AL = alkanes/alkenes/alkynes; RA = resin acids; SE = steroids; ST = sterols; SA = sugar acids; SET = sugar esters; SU = sugars; HN = heterocyclic nitrogen compounds

Our results suggest that the molecular stability of humus in soil is a function of nitrogenated or oxygenated aromatic compounds, which are somehow protected from rapid mineralization. This appears to agree with previous indications which related the recalcitrance of soil organic matter mostly to the Lignin/N and C/N ratios [39]. Furthermore, our findings suggest that, in the case of a Maize short-term cultivation, the molecular diversity in the AD, PA/PE/PH, ES/ET/KE/AC/AH/AL, and HN molecular classes becomes detrimental to the overall soil organic matter stability.

Soil system under long-term cultivation

It has been already reported that the long-term cultivation experiment considered here has revealed the significant loss of hydrophobic molecules with continuous Maize cultivation that was mitigated when a rotation with a leguminous crop was introduced [29]. This trend of progressive reduction in SOM molecular stability is clearly confirmed by the nCPR descriptor derived here from the OC content of the same humeomics fractions, whose values decreased from 0.680 for the uncultivated control soil, to 0.412 and 0.187 for the MIX and MAIZE soils, respectively.

The values of the Shannon diversity index applied to the nine molecular classes identified by the humeomic fractionation for the soils of the 20 years long-term cultivation experiment are reported in Table 2 and Fig. 3. Summing the single class SH heterogeneity to the total molecular system of each soil humeome, the SHtot increased in the order from the uncropped control soil to those under the MIX and MAIZE treatments. The same was true when the Shannon heterogeneity was weighted for the percent of OC in the different molecular classes (SHtot × % OC). In fact, the SHtot and the OC weighted SHtot increased, respectively, from 12.064 and 1.323 for the uncultivated control soil, to 13.512 and 1.543 for the Maize–Broad bean rotation, and up to 14.308 and 1.714 for the Maize monocultivation (Table 2). These findings show that the Shannon descriptor can reliably indicate that the progressive loss of molecular homogeneity of the soil humeome is related to an increasing instability of soil organic matter.

Table 2 Shannon index (SH), SH multiplied by the % OC in the specific molecular class, and their respective total values (SHtot) for all the molecular classes, derived from the molecular soil humeome for Control, MIX and Maize of the long-term experiment
Fig. 3
figure 3

Shannon Index (SH) derived from nine molecular classes identified by soil humeomic fractionation applied to soils of the 20 years long-term experiment: uncropped (CONTROL), under continuous Maize cultivation (MAIZE), and under Maize–Broad bean rotation (MIX). AA = amino acids; AM = amines; IM = imines; AD = amides; BA = benzoic acids; BE = benzoic esters; HO = heterocyclic oxygen compounds; PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PA = phenolic acids; PE = phenolic esters; PH = phenols; FA = fatty acids; DA = dicarboxylic acids; HA = hydroxy acids; ES = aliphatic esters; ET = ethers; KE = ketones; AC = alcohols; AH = aldehydes; AL = alkanes/alkenes/alkynes; RA = resin acids; SE = steroids; ST = sterols; SA = sugar acids; SET = sugar esters; SU = sugars; HN = heterocyclic nitrogen compounds

Furthermore, the SH values for the molecular heterogeneity in the different soils, can be combined with the nCPR to derive the molecular stability of organic matter ratio (SOMR of Eq. 4), that more directly associates molecular heterogeneity and hydrophobicity of the soil humeome to describe the overall soil organic matter resistance to changes. In fact, the decreasing trend of SOMR values confirmed the loss of molecular stability of SOM in the 20 years long experiment, since it passed from 0.514 of the uncultivated control soil, to the intermediate 0.267 of the partially protected soil humus of the MIX soil, to the least 0.109 of the most exploited soil under maize monoculture (Table 2).

When it was considered the single SH for each of the nine molecular classes identified in the soil humeome of the long-term experiment (Fig. 3), an increasing heterogeneity from CONTROL to MIX and MAIZE soils was noted for AD and HN classes, though only the SH for amide in the MAIZE soil was significantly different from those of the other two treatments. However, when the SH was weighted for the % OC in the molecular class (Fig. 4), it was only the heterocyclic nitrogen that revealed a substantial difference among soil humeomes, passing from 0.197 of the uncultivated control soil, to 0.444 for MIX soil, and up to 0.642 for that under the MAIZE soil. As in the case of the Maize treatments in the short-term experiment, also after 20 years of cultivation under maize monoculture, the HN compounds increased in heterogeneity and amount in the soil humeome, thus confirming previous observations [40], and suggesting that this class of compounds may well represent a molecular indicator of soil organic matter residual stability.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Shannon (SH) Index weighted for % OC in the nine molecular classes identified by soil humeomic fractionation applied to soils of the 20 years long-term experiment: uncropped (CONTROL), under continuous Maize cultivation (MAIZE), and under Maize-Broad bean rotation (MIX). AA = amino acids; AM = amines; IM = imines; AD = amides; BA = benzoic acids; BE = benzoic esters; HO = heterocyclic oxygen compounds; PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PA = phenolic acids; PE = phenolic esters; PH = phenols; FA = fatty acids; DA = dicarboxylic acids; HA = hydroxy acids; ES = aliphatic esters; ET = ethers; KE = ketones; AC = alcohols; AH = aldehydes; AL = alkanes/alkenes/alkynes; RA = resin acids; SE = steroids; ST = sterols; SA = sugar acids; SET = sugar esters; SU = sugars; HN = heterocyclic nitrogen compounds

The relationship between the nCPR and SOMR provided an additional key to assess the dynamics of the molecular stability of soil humus systems in both the short- and long-term experiments. By plotting all SOMR values versus those of nCPR (Fig. 5), it was found that the largest hydrophobicity and homogeneity of the molecular humeome was in the uncropped control soil of the long-term experiment, which also showed the greatest molecular stability of soil humus. Cultivation with Maize decreased significantly both hydrophobicity and molecular resilience of soil humus in both the short- and long-term experiment. Conversely, the MIX treatment in the 20 years long experiment reduced somewhat the loss of hydrophobicity and molecular stability of soil humus, thus revealing SOMR values similar to those of the control soil in the short-term experiment (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Plot of SOMR versus nCPR for the soil humeomes of both the short- (black) and long-term (red) experiments

Conclusion

This work showed that using the results of Humeomic fractionation, it was possible to express the heterogeneity of the complex molecular system of soil humus by the simple Shannon descriptor. In fact, the Shannon diversity index was derived from the different components identified in soil humus through the detailed Humeomic chemical sequential fractionation. The Shannon index of molecular heterogeneity applied here to soil humeomes developed under different cropping systems, enabled to also derive an index of humus molecular stability when combined with the degree of hydrophobicity of the soil humeome.

Our findings revealed that heterogeneity and hydrophobicity had opposite trends when soil humus stability was perturbed by cultivation. In fact, both in the short- and long-term experiments, the hydrophobicity decreased with continuous Maize cultivation, while the heterogeneity of the soil humus molecular system was found to concomitantly enhance. This phenomenon was significantly reduced when a soil management based on a maize-leguminous rotation was adopted, thus confirming the benefits of the rotation practice in maintaining the molecular stability of soil humus, and soil health in general.

The Shannon index derived for specific molecular classes present in the soil humeome also revealed that nitrogenated and/or oxygenated aromatic compounds were mostly responsible for the molecular resilience of soil organic matter. In fact, the short-term experiment showed a decrease of the Shannon diversity index for the classes of amides, phenolic esters/phenolic ethers/phenols, and heterocyclic nitrogen compounds, while the heterogeneity and quantity of heterocyclic nitrogen was related to the overall loss of soil humus molecular stability in the long-term experiment.

The results of this study suggest that the collection of detailed molecular information on the composition of a soil humeome is essential to derive a single numerical descriptor that can accurately highlight the differences in soil humus molecular stability under different land use and management. Moreover, this descriptor allows calculations of SOMR and nCPR values, which can be used, as in Fig. 5 of this study, to compare different soil types and agricultural practices and serve as a tool for decision makers to program measures of soil reclamation and improvement of soil biodiversity.

Availability of data and materials

The original data which were analyzed and used to generate the results of this meta-analysis study are included in these published articles [and their supplementary information files]: (1) Drosos M, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Vinci G, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. A molecular zoom into soil Humeome by a direct sequential chemical fractionation of soil. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:807–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.059. (2) Drosos M, Piccolo A. The molecular dynamics of soil humus as a function of tillage. L Degrad Dev. 2018;29:1792–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2989. (3) Savarese C, Drosos M, Spaccini R, Cozzolino V, Piccolo A. Molecular characterization of soil organic matter and its extractable humic fraction from long-term field experiments under different cropping systems. Geoderma. 2021;383:114700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114700.

Abbreviations

AA:

Amino acids

AC:

Alcohols

AD:

Amides

AH:

Aldehydes

AL:

Alkanes/alkenes/alkynes

AM:

Amines

AQU2:

Weakly ester-bound humeomic hydrosoluble fraction

AQU3:

Strongly ester-bound humeomic hydrosoluble fraction

AQU4:

Strongly ether-bound humeomic hydrosoluble fraction

BA:

Benzoic acids

BE:

Benzoic esters

CPR:

Chemical protection ratio

DA:

Dicarboxylic acids

ES:

Aliphatic esters

ET:

Aliphatic ethers

FA:

Fatty acids

HA:

Hydroxy acids

HN:

Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds

HO:

Heterocyclic oxygen compounds

IM:

Imines

KE:

Ketones

MAIZE:

Soil after 20 years of Maize monoculture

MAIZE 1:

Soil after 1 year of Maize cultivation

MAIZE 3:

Soil after 3 years of Maize cultivation

MIX:

Soil after 20 years of maize-broad bean Vicia faba L., rotation

nCPR:

Normalized chemical protection ratio

OC:

Organic carbon

ORG1:

Unbound organosoluble humeomic fraction

ORG2:

Weakly ester-bound humeomic organosoluble fraction

ORG3:

Strongly ester-bound humeomic organosoluble fraction

PA:

Phenolic acids

PAH:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

PE:

Phenolic esters

PH:

Phenols

RA:

Resin acids

RESOM:

Final residual soil humeomic hydrosoluble fraction

RESORG:

Final residual soil humeomic organosoluble fraction

SA:

Sugar acids

SE:

Steroids

SET:

Sugar esters

SH:

Shannon index

SHtot :

Total Shannon heterogeneity

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

SOM:

Soil organic matter

SOMR:

Stability soil organic matter ratio

ST:

Sterols

SU:

Sugars

References

  1. Brady N, Weil R. The soil around us. In: Fox D, editor. The nature and properties of soils. 15th ed. Columbus: Pearson Education; 2017. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osman, KT. Soil organic matter. In: Soils. Springer, Dordrecht; 2013. p. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5663-2_7.

  3. Turner BL. Soil as an archetype of complexity: a systems approach to improve insights, learning, and management of coupled biogeochemical processes and environmental externalities. Soil Syst. 2021;5:39. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5030039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Drosos M, Vinci G, Cozzolino V. The molecular composition of humus carbon: Recalcitrance and reactivity in soils. In: The future of soil carbon its conservation and formation. Garcia C, Nannipieri P, Hernandez T, editors. Academic Press; 2018. p. 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811687-6.00004-3.

  5. Piccolo A. The supramolecular structure of humic substances: a novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv Agron. 2002;75:57–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(02)75003-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature. 2015;528:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wells MJM. Supramolecular answers to the organic matter controversy. J Environ Qual. 2019;48:1644–51. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2019.02.0089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nebbioso A, Piccolo A. Basis of a humeomics science: Chemical fractionation and molecular characterization of humic biosuprastructures. Biomacromol. 2011;12:1187–99. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101488e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nebbioso A, Piccolo A. Advances in humeomics: enhanced structural identification of humic molecules after size fractionation of a soil humic acid. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;720:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.01.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drosos M, Nebbioso A, Piccolo A. Humeomics: a key to unravel the humusic pentagram. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018;123:513–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vinci G, Cangemi S, Bridoux M, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. Molecular properties of the Humeome of two calcareous grassland soils as revealed by GC/qTOF-MS and NMR spectroscopy. Chemosphere. 2021;279:130518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130518.

  12. Vinci G, Piccolo A, Bridoux M. Complementary ESI and APPI high resolution mass spectrometry unravel the molecular complexity of a soil humeome. Anal Chim Acta. 2022;1194:339398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.339398.

  13. Drosos M, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Vinci G, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. A molecular zoom into soil Humeome by a direct sequential chemical fractionation of soil. Sci Total Environ. 2017;586:807–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Nieder R, Richter J. Sequestration of a biologically labile organic carbon in soils by humified organic matter. Clim Change. 2004;67:329–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-1822-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Islam MR, Singh B, Dijkstra FA. Stabilisation of soil organic matter: interactions between clay and microbes. Biogeochemistry. 2022;160:145–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00956-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke KR, Gorley RN, Sommerfield PJ, Warwick RM. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 3rd ed. Plymouth: Primer-e, Ltd.; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barrantes G, Sandoval L. Conceptual and statistical problems associated with the use of diversity indices in ecology conceptual and statistical problems associated with the use of diversity indices in ecology. Rev Biol Trop. 2009;57:451–60. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v57i3.5467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herath D, Jayasundara D, Ackland D, Saeed I, Tang S-L, Halgamuge S. Assessing species diversity using metavirome data: methods and challenges. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017;15:447–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2017.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tláskal V, Voříšková J, Baldrian P. Bacterial succession on decomposing leaf litter exhibits a specific occurrence pattern of cellulolytic taxa and potential decomposers of fungal mycelia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw177. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw177.

  20. Zeng Q, Liu Y, Zhang H, An S. Fast bacterial succession associated with the decomposition of Quercus wutaishanica litter on the Loess Plateau. Biogeochemistry. 2019;144:119–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00575-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang H, Huang Y, An S, Zeng Q, Wang B, Bai X, Huang Q. Decay stages and meteorological factors affect microbial community during leaf litter in situ decomposition. Soil Ecol Lett. 2023;5:220160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-022-0160-4.

  22. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Savy D, Drosos M., Cozzolino V. (2019) The soil humeome: chemical structure, functions and technological perspectives. In: Vaz S. Jr., editor. Sustainable agrochemistry: a compendium of technologies. Heidelberg: Springer Nature, 2019. p. 183–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17891-8_7.

  24. Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Carral P, González-Vila FJ, Almendros G. The diversity of methoxyphenols released by pyrolysis-gas chromatography as predictor of soil carbon storage. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1508:130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.05.068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Hernández Z, Almendros G. Soil carbon storage predicted from the diversity of pyrolytic alkanes. Biol Fertil Soils. 2018;54:617–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1285-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Almendros G, Hernández Z, Sanz J, Rodríguez-Sánchez S, Jiménez-González MA, González-Pérez JA. Graphical statistical approach to soil organic matter resilience using analytical pyrolysis data. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1533:164–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.12.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Panettieri M, Jiménez-González MA, De Sosa LL, Almendros G, Madejón E. Chemical diversity and molecular signature of soil humic fractions used as proxies of soil quality under contrasted tillage management. Spanish J Soil Sci. 2021;11:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Drosos M, Piccolo A. The molecular dynamics of soil humus as a function of tillage. L Degrad Dev. 2018;29:1792–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Savarese C, Drosos M, Spaccini R, Cozzolino V, Piccolo A. Molecular characterization of soil organic matter and its extractable humic fraction from long-term field experiments under different cropping systems. Geoderma. 2021;383:114700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114700.

  30. Niu X, Cheng Y, Feng X, Sun F, Gu Y. Effects of fertilizer and weed species richness on soil nematode community in a microcosm field experiment. Soil Ecol Lett. 2023;5:151–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-021-0123-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dilebo T, Feyissa T, Asfaw Z, Zewdu A. On-farm diversity, use pattern, and conservation of enset (Ensete ventricosum) genetic resources in southern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00569-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ. A tribute to Claude–Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the “Shannon-Wiener” Index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2003;12:177–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck J, Schwanghart W. Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories : an update. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Piccolo A, Conte P, Spaccini R, Mbagwu JSC. Influence of land use on the humic substances of some tropical soils of Nigeria. Eur J Soil Sci. 2005;56:343–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00671.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Saviozzi A, Levi-Minzi R, Cardelli R, Riffaldi R. A comparison of soil quality in adjacent cultivated, forest and native grassland soils. Plant Soil. 2001;233:251–9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010526209076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lorenz K, Lal R, Preston CM, Nierop KGJ. Strengthening the soil organic carbon pool by increasing contributions from recalcitrant aliphatic bio(macro)molecules. Geoderma. 2007;142:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hansen M, Saarsalmi A, Peltre C. Changes in SOM composition and stability to microbial degradation over time in response to wood chip ash fertilisation. Soil Biol Biochem. 2016;99:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.05.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Carral P, Abd-Elmabod SK, Almendros G. The pyrolytical fingerprint of nitrogen compounds reflects the content and quality of soil organic carbon. Geoderma. 2022;428:116187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116187.

  39. Preston CM, Nault JR, Trofymow JA. Chemical changes during 6 years of decomposition of 11 litters in some Canadian forest sites. Part 2. 13C abundance, solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy and the meaning of “lignin.” Ecosystems. 2009;12:1078–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9267-z.

  40. Jandl G, Baum C, Heckrath G, Greve MH, Kanal A, Mander Ü, Maliszeska-Kordybach B, Niedzwiecki J, Eckhardt K-U, Leinweber P. Erosion induced heterogeneity of soil organic matter in catenae from the baltic sea catchment. Soil Syst. 2019;3:42. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems3020042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.D. and M.O. and A.P. wrote the manuscript. V.C. and A.S. were major contributors in writing the manuscript. M.D., A.S. and A.P. conceptualized and supervised the current article formation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marios Drosos or Antonio Scopa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This manuscript is an original paper that has not been published in any other journal. The authors agreed to maintain the copyright rule.

Consent for publication

The authors agree with the publication of this manuscript in this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drosos, M., Orlando, M., Cozzolino, V. et al. Deriving the Shannon Index from the soil molecular Humeome serves as a descriptor of soil organic matter stability under different cropping systems. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00473-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00473-w

Keywords