Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Solid–liquid extraction of bioactive compounds as a green alternative for developing novel biostimulant from Linum usitatissimum L.

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 10, Article number: 108 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The interest expressed by the agriculture in the category of innovative biostimulants is due to the intensive search for novel preparations based on natural substances i.a. allelochemicals. Scientific research into the design and testing of next-generation biostimulants marks advances for sustainable agricultural production.

Results

Our research represents an innovative and comprehensive approach to the use of Linum usitatissimum L. seed extracts in soybean cultivation using foliar treatments. A multi-tiered approach was adopted, involving both the assessment of soybean responses at the agronomic, morphological and biochemical levels. It was hypothesized that the extract would improve the growth and yield of soybean through mechanisms based on improved physiological and biochemical processes. The study showed that the extract was rich in micro- and macro-nutrients (in particular potassium and zinc), amino acids (with the largest proportion of glutamic acid), fatty acids (predominant oleic + elaidic acids) and carbohydrates (sucrose and glucose). Soybean responded positively by increased in plant height, number of pods and seed yield. The results confirmed that the tested biostimulant is not only an environmentally friendly product, but also is capable of increasing the growth and productivity of soybeans, thus increasing farmers' profit. The obtained yield was characterized by a lower total proteins pool (average decrease approx. 2%). The extract caused changes in the amino acid profile (especially in the case of proline and lysine) and fatty acid composition (significantly higher content of acids: heptadecanoic, octadecanoic, eicosanoic, eicosapentaenoic, docosanoic, erucic, tricosanoic).

Conclusions

All the observations made confirm that the extract positively affected the soybean crop. Based on the study, it was concluded that solid–liquid extraction could be considered as a green alternative for prototyping a novel and ecological biostimulant.

Graphical Abstract

Background

In recent years, the development of environmental awareness has taken place in scientific and social circles. The necessity of introducing pro-environmental changes in all fields of human activity has been noticed, including agriculture, which has become one of the economic sectors with a huge impact on the natural environment. The significant increase in demand for food and feed recorded on a global scale seems to put additional and constantly expanding pressure on this branch of the economy. Currently, the greatest challenge facing humanity seems to be developing the productivity of crops to feed the growing population while conserving natural resources [11]. To overcome these and achieve pro-environmental goals, scientists are focusing their efforts on developing solutions to reduce and/or rationalize the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This will help prepare agriculture for the new coming green revolution, which is largely defined by cost-effective and ecologically friendly approaches to sustaining the agricultural sector [43]. The European farm-to-table strategy (EC COM/2020/381 [25]) is to reduce: (1) the use of chemical pesticides by 50%, (2) nutrient losses by at least 50%, and (3) fertilizer use by at least 20% by 2030. In addition, a plan to bring 25% of farming land under organic cultivation is fundamental. On this road to agricultural change, it seems that genetic improvements and better varieties will be insufficient, and the key to achieving these goals will be biostimulants. These products are natural preparations that have gained a lot of interest in recent years, mainly due to their role in stimulating plant growth and yield and reducing the impact of abiotic and biotic stresses [43]. The current Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 [56] defines biostimulants as "products that stimulate plant nutritional processes regardless of the nutrient content of the product, whose sole purpose is to improve one or more of the following characteristics of the plant or its rhizosphere: nutrient use efficiency, abiotic stress tolerance, quality characteristics, availability of limited nutrients in the soil or rhizosphere". Thus, given the definition provided, biostimulants do not directly affect pathogens and biotic stresses, but are mainly used to improve crop yields under both adverse and optimal environmental conditions [14]. Higher yields in accordance even with organic practices are the main advantages of these bioproducts [32]. Depending on the type of crop, biostimulants can be applied as: seed priming [50], soil drenches, foliar spray, and additives to hydroponic solutions [32]. It should also be emphasized that these products can be applied according to different schemes, individually adapted to crop plants and environmental conditions, i.e., regularly at the vegetative stage or preventively before or during stress [30, 32]. Biostimulants can be produced from a whole range of raw materials, which can include various natural compounds such as beneficial microorganisms, protein hydrolysates, humic acids, seaweed extracts, and amino acids [64, 65], plant extracts. Therefore, usually, biostimulants are classified by origin rather than by the chemical structure of the compounds included in their composition [13, 24, 47]. The most important aspect, however, is the fact that these agricultural bioproducts are produced from raw materials rich in bioactive compounds that can exhibit action in many ways, including independent, additive, and/or synergistic. However, the exact mechanisms of action behind the biostimulant effect are still unidentified [30]. Currently, the mode of action of agronomical bioproducts is identified indirectly through plant responses at the biochemical, physiological, and molecular levels [36]. The highly complex nature of biostimulants and the broad heterogeneity of their chemical composition are responsible for the wide range of biochemical, cellular, and physiological responses they induce in crop plants. These responses include improved seed germination and seedling development [31, 67], changes in secondary metabolism [22], and improved yield and yield quality [45, 52].

Studies are available in the literature describing the use of plant extracts as effective natural biostimulants to support crop plants [1, 12, 26, 39, 53, 54, 57, 69, 75, 76]. Du Jardin [24] coined the term "botanicals" for plant-derived biostimulants. The results of few studies show that botanical extracts can be produced from different morphological parts, including seeds, leaves, flowers, or roots, of higher plants belonging to the families Amaryllidaceae, Brassicaceae, Ericaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Moringaceae, Plantaginaceae, Poaceae, Rosaceae, Solanaceae, Theaceae and Vitaceae [4, 5, 80]. The results of these studies have shown that exogenous application of these bioproducts can result in improved stress tolerance of crop plants [40, 44]. Previous studies by our team, on the use of aqueous extracts of allelopathic plants including Artemisia absinthium L., Levisticum officinale Koch. and Arctium lappa L. in a 3-year soybean crop proved that their application increased plant yield. Additionally, the botanical extracts analyzed were shown to modify the biochemical indices of soybean. In the search for new plant species that show biostimulatory potential, the seeds Linum usitatissimum L. have been proposed. This was due to the results of our research, which proved that water extracts, obtained from common flax, were effective in improving germination and emergence of various crops, as well as reducing microbial contamination [37, 18, 19, 74]. In addition, our results showed the effectiveness of flaxseed macerates in soybean cultivation, but the issue was the efficiency of ecological cold extraction of biologically active compounds [39].

Extrusion is most commonly used to extract biologically active compounds from flaxseeds, but this method has the disadvantage of high loss of vitamins, phospholipids, phytosterols, and antioxidants [35]. Solvent extraction is a solution to this problem, but the use of acetone, methanol, and petroleum ether, among others, may decrease the biological activity of the extracts and contribute to environmental pollution. Therefore, an ecological approach seems to be the use of water or supercritical fluid (e.g., CO2) as a solvent as well as the application of microwave and ultrasonic-assisted extraction [81].

Despite the concentration of many biologically active compounds and the use of the flaxseed plant for cosmetic, food, medical, and pharmaceutical purposes, there is no information in the available literature on its potential agronomic use. On the other hand, many arguments indicate that flax could be an ideal candidate for the creation of biostimulant preparations, given appropriate extraction methods. This is particularly relevant for soybean crops. Therefore, the use of these products, especially those of natural origin, seems to be necessary for sustainable soybean production [72].

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the biostimulant potential of an aqueous flaxseed extract, designed and produced to increase the soybean yield. It was hypothesized that the aqueous flaxseed extract could be considered a new potential biostimulating tool for plant growth.

Material and methods

Biostimulants production and characterization

Material: Seeds of Linum usitatissimum L. were purchased from biofarming (Runo Poland, PL-EKO 07 EU Organic Farming). The extraction was conducted according to the protocol described in our previous research [76]. For the infusion preparation 5 g of ground material was added to 250 mL of distilled water (temperature 95ºC) and maintained in a water bath for 30 min (the constant temperature in a sample solution 95ºC). The mixture was left for 48 h at the temperature of 4 °C. Then, the resulted suspension was centrifuged at 4250×g for 5 min and filtered (Whatman qualitative filter paper, Grade 1) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of the biostimulant production

Full size image

Mineral composition of the infusion

The extracts (1 mL) were mineralized with 65% nitric acid using the microwave digestion system under high pressure and increasing temperature algorithm up to 220 °C. During the digestion procedure Ethos One—microwave digestion system (Milestone, Italy) was used. After the mineralization procedure all samples were filled up to 50 mL with extra pure deionization water (< 0.07 µS cm−1). The measurements were performed by Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometers (ICP-OES, Thermo iCAP Dual 6500, USA). Each measurement was made in two spectral: radial and axial, across and along with horizontally burning argon plasma and concentrations were calculated using calibration curves. The certified reference material was used when obtaining recoveries for individual elements, as in Fig. 2 [82].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic diagram of the biostimulant prototyping

Full size image

Qualitative–quantitative analysis of sugars in the extract

The sugar content in the obtained product was evaluated according to the EN 12630, 1999 standard [26] and method described by Pereira da Costa and Conte-Junior [46] (HPLC system). The chromatographic equipment SYKAM (Eresing, Germany) consisting of sample injector S5250, pump system S1125, column oven S4120 and RI detector S3590 was used. Separation was carried out using Sugar-D column (4.6 mm I.D. × 250 mm; COSMOSIL). The separation was achieved with a mobile phase of 75% ACN in water in isocratic mode. The flow rate was 0.5 mL min−1 at column temperature set at 30 °C. The volume of injected sample was 20 µL and 20 min was needed to complete the analysis.

Protein amino acids composition in infusions from seeds of L. usitatissimum L.

The evaluation of amino acids has been carried out with the use of the amino acids analyser AAA 400 (Ingos, Prague, Czech Republic) with UV–Vis detector. The separation of amino acids has been achieved using 0.37 × 450 mm ion exchange column thermostated at 60 °C. The detection of amino acids has been conducted at following wavelength 570 nm but the proline at 440 nm. The time analysis was of 90 min.

Determination of fatty acids in infusions from seeds of L. usitatissimum L.

The esterified sample was used to determine the fatty acid composition. The sample was prepared according to Zhang et al. [84] using Varian 450-GC gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (FID) equipped with SelectTM Biodiesel, capillary column 30 mm (length) × 0.32 mm (ID) × 0.25 µm film thickness. Helium was used as the carrier gas at the flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1.

Application of the infusions from seeds of L. usitatissimum L. in field trials—plant material and growth conditions

Soybean plants and seeds (cv. Abelina) originated from field experiment (2017–2019) conducted in Perespa (50° 66′ N; 23° 63′ E, Poland). The experiment was designed and performed in a random block system in four replications, on experimental plots with the size of 15 m2. Plants were grown on soil classified as Gleyic Phaeozems (pH in 1 M KCl 7.3–7.4). The average level of available nutrients in 100 g of soil was as follows: 12.6–14.2 mg P2O, 15.2–17.1 mg K2O, 6.3–6.8 mg Mg and 8.1–9.1 mg N–NO3 + N–NH4. Triticum aestivum L. was used as the previous crop. Seeds were sown on the 2 May 2017, 2018, and 2019 with 4.0 cm gaps in rows with 30 cm spacing. No herbicides were used, and weeds were removed mechanically and manually. The fertilization and irrigation were not carried out. In each growing season, plants were treated with the extracts from Linum usitatissimum L. Product was applied in the form of double plant spraying (250 L ha−1) at the BBCH 13–15 and BBCH 61 (BBCH—Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt and CHemical industry—scale of the phenological development stages) developmental stages of soybean. Combinations with plants sprayed with water used for extract preparation served as the control (Fig. 2). Spraying was performed with the Pilmet 412 LUX (Unia, Grudziądz, Poland) sprayer equipped with nozzles air-induction flat fan nozzles 6MSC (working pressure 0.30 MPa). After the pods have matured (BBCH 89), plants were harvested. Dates and dosage of application were chosen based on results of our earlier experiments addressing the use of natural and synthetic biostimulants in soybean cultivation [77].

Analysis of soybean plants

Biometric traits of soybean plants were determined: the plants height and the location height of the first pod. The productivity of the crop was also evaluated by testing the weight of 1,000 seeds, the number of pods per m2, and yield.

Protein content and amino acids composition in soybean seeds

The total protein content in seeds from control crops and crops with tested biostimulant was measured by the Kjeldahl method [7], Official Method 992.23, 979.09). Hydrolysis of protein into amino acids has been carried out according to Davies and Thomas [20]. The sample (70 g) was placed in hydrolyzer tube (Ingos) with 20 mL of 6 M HCl. After that the tube was clamped and the sample was kept at 110 °C for 20 h. After cooling to room temperature (RT), the hydrolysate was filtered through a G-5 glass filter, the solvents were evaporated and the residues were redissolved in citric buffer at pH 2.2. Before the HPLC analysis, samples were filtered (0.22 µm filter). The evaluation of amino acids has been performed using the amino acids analyser AAA 400 (Ingos, Prague, Czech Republic) with photometric detector (0.37 × 450 mm ion exchange column, 60 °C). The amino acids have been detected at 570 nm but the proline at 440 nm. The time analysis was of 90 min (Fig. 2).

Fat content and determination of fatty acids in soybean seeds

The total fat content in the seeds of the control and experimental groups was analyzed by the acid hydrolysis method ([7], Official Method 922.86). For the fatty acids evaluation the GC column was set Select™ Biodiesel, 30 m (length) × 0.32 mm (ID) × 0.25 µm film thickness. Helium was used as the carrier gas [84] (Fig. 2).

Evaluation of economic effect of the application of L. usitatissimum L. extract in soybean field cultivation—partial budget analysis

Partial budget analysis (PBA) was assessed to evaluate the net economic benefits. The economic effect of Linum usitatissimum L. extracts application was computed based on the value of yield increase resulting from the use of products and costs of their application in soybean cultivation [76]. Income growth (EUR ha−1) resulting from the use of biostimulants was calculated as a difference between value of yield increase and costs of the use. The value of yield increase (EUR ha−1) was evaluated as a product of average price of soybean seeds in a given study year and a difference between the seed yield from the combination with extracts application and seed yield from the control combination. Costs of the products treatment (EUR ha−1) were computed as a sum of four parameters: cost of extracts purchase, cost of water used for the treatment, cost of performing the treatment, and cost of human labor for extract preparation. The average purchase price for seeds was determined from the market offers (311.12 EUR t−1). The cost of Linum usitatissimum L. seeds (1.12 EUR kg−1) was taken from herbal store (Runo Poland). The cost of water was the average price of 1 m3 (1.50 EUR m−3) in the Lubelskie Province. It was estimated that it would take an hour of human labor to prepare the extract for 1 hectare of the crop. Cost of human labor for bioproduct preparation (10 EUR ha−1). The cost of the procedure was the average price of the plant spraying service (17.56 EUR ha−1).

Statistical analysis

All tests of extracts and soybean plants and seeds were performed in 3 replicates. The normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results obtained from the studies were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA. Determination of the significance of differences between mean values was made, based on Tukey's confidence intervals (significance level p ≤ 0.05). Statistica 13.3 software (TIBCO Software Inc., USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Chemical composition of infusion

The study showed that flaxseed infusions were rich in micro- and macro-nutrients (Figs. 3 and 4). As a result of hot water extraction, obtained preparations were characterized by high concentrations of K (90.19 mg mL−1), Ca (26.83 mg mL−1), Mg (12.43 mg mL−1), P (7.37 mg mL−1), and S (25.99 mg mL−1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Microelements in the flaxseed infusion; mean and standard deviation

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Content of macroelements in the flaxseed extract; mean and standard deviation

Full size image

The evaluation of micronutrients content showed that in the studied botanical preparation, there were significant concentrations of Zn (0.154 mg mL−1) and Cu (0.133 mg mL−1). The presence of Fe (0.021 mg mL−1) and Mn (0.035 mg mL−1), was also demonstrated. However, no presence of toxic elements was found in the extracts. The study also revealed the presence of beneficial elements for plants in the form of Na (32.85 mg mL−1) and Al (0.002 mg mL−1).

The sucrose content was the highest at 0.764 mg mL−1. In contrast, the glucose content was more than 47% lower at 0.401 mg mL−1. It was also found that the flaxseed infusions did not contain fructose (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Carbohydrates and amino acids in the water extract from L. usitatissimum L.; mean and standard deviation

Full size image

The results also showed that the botanical flaxseed extract had a diverse amino acids profile (Fig. 5). Dominant amounts were found for three amino acids: glutamic acid (0.823 mg mL−1), arginine (0.352 mg mL−1), and aspartic acid (0.346 mg mL−1). On the other hand, the concentrations of tyrosine (0.051 mg mL−1), proline (0.092 mg mL−1), and histidine (0.060 mg mL−1) were the lowest among the entire pool of amino acids present in the extract (Fig. 5).

Results of testing fatty acids in fat extracted from flaxseed are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Fatty acids in the water extract from L. usitatissimum L. (mean ± standard deviation)
Full size table

In the bioproducts, 0.08% fat was extracted. The analysis showed that among the fatty acids identified, oleic acid and elaidic acid (0.0217 g 100 g−1), and hexadecanoic acid (0.0180 g 100 g−1) had the highest proportion.

Extract application affected morphological characteristics and yields of soybean

Results of a field study, that analyzed the effect of extracts, showed that foliar application determined morphological traits in soybean (Fig. 6). It was found that soybean plants grew higher as a result of infusion application (124.1 cm, 126.3 cm, 118.3 cm, respectively, in 2017, 2018, 2019). In the first and second year of the field experiment, it was noted that the height of plants from the crop in which the biostimulant was tested was approximately 12% higher compared to control plants. Lower differences occurred in 2019, when changes reached about 5%.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The effect of the water extracts from Linum usitatissimum L. treatment on biometric traits and yield of soybean; Values not sharing a common letter indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05

Full size image

Analysis of another biometric trait proved that in case of the height of the first pod (parameter important for combine harvesting of soybeans), the application of linseed infusions increased this parameter (increase of over 40, 26 and 23%, respectively, in 2017, 2018, 2019, relative to control plants).

Additionally, soybean plants responded to the application of extract by changing the number of pods per m2. It was found that this structural element of soybean yield was improved by more than 30% by the application of Linum usitatissimum L. extracts.

The observation of higher yields after the application of the tested bioproducts in relation to the control crop was a confirmation of the biostimulatory effect. It is worth noting that trends in terms of yield improvement were recorded in all years of field studies. In the first and second year of the field experiment, it was shown the increase in the yield of soybeans treated with the bioproduct (by more than 24 and 23% compared to the control crop). On the other hand, the greatest productivity was observed after application of the extract in the third year of the field experiment (an increase of more than 44% with respect to control crops). Analysis of the average yield from the three-year experiment proved that the effect of the biostimulant application was an average improvement in soybean yield of 30%. However, the field studies showed that the botanical extract affected the reduction of 1000 seed weight. The weight of 1000 seed of soybean was reduced by 5.6, 4.1 and 6.4% compared to the control samples in the respective years of the field experiment. This yield index was significantly higher in control seeds.

Application of the novel biostimulants changed the content of protein and amino acid profiles

The assay demonstrated that using linseed extract in soybean cultivation affected contents of total protein in the seeds. Application resulted in slight reduction in protein contents against the control (approx. 2%) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The effect of the L. usitatissimum L. extracts treatment on total protein and total fat in soybean seeds (mean ± standard deviation). Values not sharing a common letter indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05

Full size image

A qualitative analysis of soybean crops demonstrated that the seeds contained wildly different levels of amino acids (Table 2).

Table 2 The effect of the L. usitatissimum L. extracts treatment on amino acids concentration in soybean seeds (mean ± SD)
Full size table

When applied to soybean crops, infusions led to higher contents of individual amino acids against the control. The infusion-sprayed crops exhibited an increase in glutamic acid content of over 9%. Aspartic acid was the second most abundant compound in the seeds (its levels were 8% higher after infusion treatments compared to the control seeds). A similar correlation was observed for leucine (13%) and proline (24%). The least abundant amino acids were histidine and tyrosine, however, their content was higher in the soybean seeds collected from the extract-treated groups compared to the water-treated control group.

The biostimulants affected fat content and fatty acid levels in soybean seeds

The results regarding fatty acid profiles in soybeans show a multivariate soybean response to the application of linseed extracts (Table 3).

Table 3 The effect of the L. usitatissimum L. extracts treatment on fatty acids concentration in soybean seeds (mean ± SD)
Full size table

Some of the investigated fatty acids increased in level, while others decreased compared to the control seeds. Hexanoic acid (33.16 mg g−1, 25.09 mg g−1, 25.69 mg g−1), octanoic acid, and cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid were detected exclusively in seeds from the infusion-treated crops. The control soybean samples were the only ones found to contain tetracosanoic acid (0.24 mg g−1, 0.19 mg g−1 and 0.20 mg g−1). Using linseed extracts in soybean cultivation also led to a pronounced decrease in linoleic acid, and linolelaidic acid contents. The amount of α-linolenic acid in soybeans was reduced upon the application of linseed infusions against the control group. The results obtained for cis-13,16-docosadienoic acid were particularly interesting. None was detected in the control and infusion-treated seeds. The results also showed that the seed fat content was modulated by the use of linseed-derived biostimulant (Fig. 7).

The economic efficiency of using this biostimulant product

The application of flaxseed extract increased soybean yield. The results of the 3-year experiment showed that in each year a higher income was obtained after the application of the extract compared to the control in which the preparation was not applied. This was due to the fact that the costs of production and use of the biostimulant were lower than the income resulting from the increase in soybean yield.

The highest profit was recorded in the last year of the study and amounted to 300.20 EUR ha−1. The average income during the study period was 172.15 EUR ha−1 (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

The added returns incurred by the biostimulant applications

Full size image

Discussion

Currently, there is a growing interest in studying the potential of plant extracts in agriculture [6, 8]. Many research results indicate that plant extracts can act as plant resistance inducers [16] and biostimulants [17, 28, 83]. However, learning more about the potential of plant extracts requires large-scale research to prove that they can be used as effective biostimulants [15].

The tested infusions were rich in macro- and micro-elements, as well as sugars, amino acids, and fatty acids. This composition suggested that they would induce a positive effect in the soybean plants on the agronomical, physiological, biochemical and qualitative responses.

The high content of amino acids in flaxseed infusions indicates a possible biostimulatory effect, since this group of compounds is most commonly used in biostimulation of crop plants [70, 78]. Amino acids are considered to be a precursor of polyamines [79] as well as chlorophyll synthesis in developing leaves [29].

Carbohydrates, considered key molecules for plants, have also been identified in the chemical composition of infusions [48]. They are believed to have a number of functions in plants, including structural, signaling, transport, and storage, among others. The biostimulatory effects of carbohydrates may be due to their high polymerization potential, effects on osmotic balance, and stabilization of membranes and proteins [34, 48]. Flax extracts contained high concentrations of soluble carbohydrates (glucose and fructose), which may indicate a biostimulatory effect, due to the fact that they play an extremely important role in plant metabolism and growth [66].

Evaluation of the chemical composition of flaxseed water extract also revealed an abundance of mineral compounds. Micronutrients and macronutrients are used in many plant physiological processes [55]. The uptake of these compounds by plants depends on their availability after biostimulant treatments [10, 62]. However, according to the definition of biostimulants, the effects of these products cannot be attributed to the concentrations of micro- and macro-elements, as they are not fertilizers. However, their presence can have a kind of synergistic effect together with other components of plant extracts, intensifying primary or secondary metabolism in crop plants [10, 42]. In addition, the presence of beneficial elements for plants, found in the extracts, indicates their possible effect on photosynthetic traits of plants under both optimal and stressful conditions [49].

The botanical extracts were also assessed for the fatty acids content, which play important roles in plant defense, including pathways associated with phytohormones and a number of mediator signaling pathways. Several studies even indicate that plants can efficiently use linoleic acid for jasmonic acid biosynthesis. This process is associated with improved plant growth and defense mechanisms [58, 59, 61]. The fatty acids present in the composition of botanical infusions may exhibit biostimulatory effects due to the fact that they act as activators of many plant defense mechanisms through activation of the enzymatic apparatus [27, 68].

Application of water extracts of common flaxseed was a determinant of yield and structural elements of soybean yield. In our study, there was an increase in the number of pods per m2, which resulted in a higher yield with a slightly reduced level of 1000 seed weight. The application of infusion helped the soybean plants to form and fill their pods (positive effect on yield) [21]. This agronomic practice resulted in an increase not only in plant height, but also in the height of setting of the first pod. These morphological parameters are important not only for the mechanical harvesting of soybeans (large distance from the soil surface), but also affect the yield potential of the plants [60, 71]. The stimulating effect of the infusions may have been due to improved plant growth development and increased biomass accumulation [73].

The results of our study are consistent with those presented in the literature indicating that plant extracts can modify the multielemental profile of root vegetables. Extracts from plants such as the valerian, common nettle, tall goldenrod, and milk gowan have been shown to promote accumulation of elements in the edible parts of vegetables [2]. Rouphael and Colla [63] state that the nutritional and mineral status of crops treated with biostimulants (including plant extracts) suggests that this mechanism can originate from an increased “nutrient acquisition response”.

Our study also showed that the fatty acid content, as well as total fat, fluctuated between soybean crops treated with the flaxseed extract. Unfortunately, the lack of previous studies by other authors left little opportunity to compare results. The accumulation of unsaturated fatty acids is inherently linked to the membrane fluidity and plant adaptation to environmental stress. Thus, the elevated concentrations of these acids detected in the soybean may have been caused by the linseed extract, which increased soybean tolerance to abiotic stress factors. In a study by Puglisi et al. [51], the application of biostimulants based on humic-like substances was shown to increase fatty acids levels in microalgae. However, the researchers were unable to identify any potential modes of action underlying this response. Liang et al. [41] state that amino acids present in biostimulants may also modify levels of different fatty acids in crop yields, since certain amino acids synthesized in plants contain a branched aliphatic chain as part of their structure. According to literature reports, 18-carbon acids are the predominant form of fatty acids in most plants [3, 33]. Our study showed that application of botanical biostimulants increased 18-carbon acid levels in soybean seeds. This is of particular importance in the context of these acids are precursors of a large pool of biologically active compounds.

Our study of biostimulant use in soybean cultivation concluded with an economic analysis of the income generated from the production—a deciding factor for farmers choosing a product. The study demonstrated that of linseed extract was effective in improving yields, which translated directly to increased returns in actual field conditions. This is corroborated by our previous study on how the treatment with Artemisia absinthium derived biostimulants impacted income from soy cultivation. The analysis of the economic returns, yields, and costs of treatment in a 3-year field trial showed that the foliar administration of Artemisia absinthium infusions and macerates led to the highest increases in soybean yields, which in turn ensured stable profits for the producers [76]. These gains are, admittedly, not spectacular when compared with the economic performance of commercial biostimulants applied to bean crops. Treatment of bean crops with Kelpak SL increased the average income by more than EUR 600 per hectare, whereas the same parameter amounted to over EUR 300 for Terra Sorb [38]. While it is true that this analysis concerned a different crop, it still must be stated that further work will be needed to improve the performance of the novel biostimulants. The solution may lie in changing the method of administration or extraction. Nevertheless, the established economic benefits are sufficient to qualify the extract examined herein as biostimulating products.

The results proved that the biological activity of flaxseed infusions is sufficient for it to be classified as ecological biostimulants. The prototyped extract complied with the requirements set out in the definition of these bioproducts (Regulation (EU) 2019/1009).

Summary and conclusions

Based on the study, it was concluded that solid–liquid extraction could be considered as a green alternative for prototyping a novel and ecological biostimulant. This study demonstrated also the potential of flaxseed extract, extracted by aqueous hot extraction, as a biostimulant in soybean cultivation due to its ability to improve plant growth, yield, and nutritional status. This therefore indicates that biostimulants can be obtained from resources readily available in nature such as medicinal, allelopathic or herbal plants. Thus, our study will make an important contribution to the search for new sustainable solutions for agriculture.

Based on the chemical characterization of common flaxseed infusions, there was a significant presence of biologically active compounds including amino acids and fatty acids, mineral compounds that could support the beneficial effects found in the cultivated soybean. The soybean crops responded positively to foliar application of the extract, showing enhancement on agronomic, morphologic, and biochemical levels. The growth and yields of soybeans improved after the tested infusion was administered. The results confirmed that the tested biostimulant is not only an environmentally friendly product, but also capable of increasing the growth and productivity of soybeans, thus intensification farmers' profitability. Application of the flaxseed extracts induced primary and secondary metabolism, while also promoting the accumulation of fatty acids and amino acids in the seeds. Our analysis of soybean parameters showed, in many cases, variable but coordinated biochemical responses, indicating that the botanical extracts could be considered effective biostimulants. However, in order to consistently harness these benefits of plant biostimulants, the plants must be sprayed during specific phases of phenological development so as not to disturb the allelopathic interactions between the plants. Nevertheless, hypotheses based on the current state of knowledge have been presented in an attempt to explain the observed changes at multiple levels, including the agronomic, physiological, and biochemical ones. However, in order to fully understand the biostimulatory potential of flaxseed extracts, further research is necessary, also in the aspect of possible mitigation of negative effects of biotic and abiotic stresses on crop plants.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Abd El-Mageed TA, Semida WM, Rady MM. Moringa leaf extract as biostimulant improves water use efficiency, physio-biochemical attributes of squash plants under deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manag. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdalla MM. The potential of Moringa oleifera extract as a biostimulant in enhancing the growth, biochemical and hormonal contents in rocket (Eruca vesicaria subsp sativa) plants. Advan Res J Bioch Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPPB2012.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akbar S. Handbook of 200 medicinal plants. Cham: Springer; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16807-0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali Q, Perveen R, El-Esawi MA, Ali S, Hussain SM, Amber M, Iqbal N, Rizwan M, et al. Low doses of Cuscuta reflexa extract act as natural biostimulants to improve the germination vigor, growth, and grain yield of wheat grown under water stress: photosynthetic pigments, antioxidative defense mechanisms, and nutrient acquisition. Biomolecules. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali Q, Shehzad F, Waseem M, Shahid S, Hussain AI, Haider MZ, et al. Plant-based biostimulants and plant stress responses. In: Hasanuzzaman M, editor., et al., Plant ecophysiology and adaptation under climate change: mechanisms and perspectives I. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 625–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2156-0_22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Mohmadi SYA, Al-Ani MHI. Effect of spraying with different concentration of licorice extract and plant densities in growth and yield of Sorghum bicolor L. Iraqi. J Agric Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50i6.835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th Edn, Horwitz. W. (Eds) Gaithersburg, MD. 2000. https://www.worldcat.org/title/official-methods-of-analysis-of-aoac-international/oclc/44761301. Accessed 14 July 2023.

  8. Arshad M, Ullah MI, Çağatay NS, Abdullah A, Dikmen F, Kaya C, Khan RR. Field evaluation of water plant extracts on sucking insect pests and their associated predators in transgenic Bt cotton. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0142-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asan-Ozusaglam M, Karakoca K. Evaluation of biological activity and antioxidant capacity of Turkish licorice root extracts. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2014;2019(19):8994–9004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhat BA, Islam ST, Ali A, Sheikh BA, Tariq L, Islam SU, Dar TUH. Role of micronutrients in secondary metabolism of plants. In: Aftab T, Hakeem KR, editors. Plant micronutrients. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 311–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49856-6_13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Briglia N, Petrozza A, Hoeberichts FA, Verhoef N, Povero G. Investigating the impact of biostimulants on the row crops corn and soybean using high-efficiency phenotyping and next generation sequencing. Agronomy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bulgari R, Morgutti S, Cocetta G, Negrini N, Farris S, Calcante A, Spinardi A, Ferrari E, Mignani I, Oberti R, Ferrante A. Evaluation of borage extracts as potential biostimulant using a phenomic, agronomic, physiological, and biochemical approach. Front Plant Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campobenedetto C, Mannino G, Beekwilder J, Contartese V, Karlova R, Bertea CM. The application of a biostimulant based on tannins affects root architecture and improves tolerance to salinity in tomato plants. Sci Rep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79770-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvalho RDS, Silva MAD, Borges MTMR, Forti VA. Plant extracts in agriculture and their applications in the treatment of seeds. Ciência Rural. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. CoSTA AP, Moura GS, Gebauer JT, Franzener G. Aqueous extract and essential oil of ginger induce biochemical defense mechanisms in bean. Rev Agric Neotrop. 2019. https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v6i2.2721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cozzolino E, Giordano M, Fiorentino N, El-Nakhel C, Pannico A, Di Mola I, et al. Appraisal of biodegradable mulching films and vegetal-derived biostimulant application as eco-sustainable practices for enhancing lettuce crop performance and nutritive value. Agronomy. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Czerwińska E, Szparaga A. The vitality and healthiness of oil seeds treated by plant extracts. Acta Sci Pol Tech Agr. 2015;14:47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Czerwińska E, Szparaga A, Deszcz E. Estimation of effect of dressing in plant extracts on germination capacity of beet-roots seeds. Zeszyty Nauk UP Wroc seria Rol. 2015;611:7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davies MG, Thomas AJ. An investigation of hydrolytic techniques for the amino acid analysis of foodstuffs. J Sci Food Agric. 1973. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740241208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Morais TB, Menegaes JF, Sanchotene D, Dorneles SB, Melo AA, Swarowsky A. Biostimulants increase soybean productivity in the absence and presence of water deficit in Southern Brazil. J Agric Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v14n3p111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Saeger J, Van Praet S, Vereecke D, Park J, Jacques S, Han T, Depuydt S. Toward the molecular understanding of the action mechanism of Ascophyllum nodosum extracts on plants. J Appl Phycol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01903-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Desoky EM, Merwad AM, Rady MM. Natural biostimulants improve saline soil characteristics and salt stressed-sorghum performance. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1448861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Du Jardin P. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. EC COM/2020/381. Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52020DC0381. Accessed 25 Aug 2023.

  26. EN 12630, 1999. Fruit and vegetable juices. Determination of glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrose contents. Method using high-performance liquid chromatography. 1999. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/e0cc6569-9822-46b1-b0c2-5f0d8761f454/sist-en-12630-1999. Accessed 14 July 2023.

  27. Farmer EE. Fatty acid signalling in plants and their associated microorganisms. In: Palme K, editor. Signals and signal transduction pathways in plants. Dordrecht: Springer; 1994. p. 187–201.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Findura P, Hara P, Szparaga A, Kocira S, Czerwińska E, Bartoš P, Nowak J, Treder K. Evaluation of the effects of allelopathic aqueous plant extracts, as potential preparations for seed dressing, on the modulation of cauliflower seed germination. Agriculture. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Forde BG, Lea PJ. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. J Exp Bot. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Godlewska K, Biesiada A, Michalak I, Pacyga P. The effect of botanical extracts obtained through ultrasound-assisted extraction on white head cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) seedlings grown under controlled conditions. Sustainability. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gupta S, Hrdlička J, Ngoroyemoto N, Nemahunguni NK, Gucký T, Novák O, et al. Preparation and standardisation of smoke-water for seed germination and plant growth stimulation. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09985-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hadwiger LA. Multiple effects of chitosan on plant systems: solid science or hype. Plant Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. He M, Qin CX, Wang X, Ding NZ. Plant unsaturated fatty acids: biosynthesis and regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hincha DK, Zuther E, Heyer AG. The preservation of liposomes by raffinose family oligosaccharides during drying is mediated by effects on fusion and lipid phase transitions. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00116-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kasote DM, Badhe YS, Hegde MV. Effect of mechanical press oil extraction processing on quality of linseed oil. Ind Crops Prod. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaur H, Chahal S, Jha P, Pandey DK, Arencibia AD, Kumar V. Biostimulants, the cinderella for plant development. In: Gupta IS, Van Staden JBT, editors. Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development. London: Academic Press; 2021. p. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823048-0.00009-5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Kocira S, Czerwińska E, Szparaga A. Analysis of the ecological method of treatment in the aspect of increasing the vitality and healthiness of spring barley grains Hordeum vulgare. L Rocz Ochr Sr. 2018;20:1746–63.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kocira S, Szparaga A, Hara P, Treder K, Findura P, Bartoš P, Filip M. Biochemical and economical effect of application biostimulants containing seaweed extracts and amino acids as an element of agroecological management of bean cultivation. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74959-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kocira S, Szparaga A, Krawczuk A, Bartoš P, Zaguła G, Plawgo M, Černý P. Plant material as a novel tool in designing and formulating modern biostimulants—analysis of botanical extract from Linum usitatissimum L. Materials. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Latif HH, Mohamed HI. Exogenous applications of moringa leaf extract effect on retrotransposon, ultrastructural and biochemical contents of common bean plants under environmental stresses. S Afr J Bot. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liang Y, Kong F, Torres-Romero I, Burlacot A, Cuine S, Légeret B, et al. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism impacts triacylglycerol homeostasis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mannino G, Campobenedetto C, Vigliante I, Contartese V, Gentile C, Bertea CM. The application of a plant biostimulant based on seaweed and yeast extract improved tomato fruit development and quality. Biomolecules. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mrid RB, Benmrid B, Hafsa J, Boukcim H, Sobeh M, Yasri A. Secondary metabolites as biostimulant and bioprotectant agents: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Noman A, Ali Q, Naseem J, Javed MT, Kanwal H, Islam W, et al. Sugar beet extract acts as a natural bio-stimulant for physio-biochemical attributes in water stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Physiol Plant. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2681-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Omoarelojie LO, Kulkarni MG, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Modes of action of biostimulants in plants. In: Gupta S, Van Staden J, editors. Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development. London: Academic Press; 2021. p. 445–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823048-0.00015-0.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Pereira Da Costa M, Conte-Junior CA. Chromatographic methods for the determination of carbohydrates and organic acids in foods of animal origin. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pereira C, Dias MI, Petropoulos SA, Plexida S, Chrysargyris A, Tzortzakis N, et al. The effects of biostimulants, biofertilizers and water-stress on nutritional value and chemical composition of two spinach genotypes (Spinacia oleracea L.). Molecules. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Peshev D, Vergauwen R, Moglia A, Hideg É, Van den Ende W. Towards understanding vacuolar antioxidant mechanisms: a role for fructans? J Exp Bot. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Piccolo E, Ceccanti C, Guidi L, Landi M. Role of beneficial elements in plants: implications for the photosynthetic process. Photosynthetica. 2021;59:349–60. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2021.032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pilon-Smits EA, Quinn CF, Tapken W, Malagoli M, Schiavon M. Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Puglisi I, Barone V, Sidella S, Coppa M, Broccanello C, Gennari M, Baglieri A. Biostimulant activity of humic-like substances from agro-industrial waste on Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda. Eur J Phycol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2018.1458997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rabêlo VM, Magalhães PC, Bressanin LA, Carvalho DT, Reis COD, Karam D, et al. The foliar application of a mixture of semisynthetic chitosan derivatives induces tolerance to water deficit in maize, improving the antioxidant system and increasing photosynthesis and grain yield. Sci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44649-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Rady MM, Kusvuran A, Alharby HF, Alzahrani Y, Kusvuran S. Pretreatment with proline or an organic bio-stimulant induces salt tolerance in wheat plants by improving antioxidant redox state and enzymatic activities and reducing the oxidative stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9860-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rady MM, Mohamed GF. Modulation of salt stress effects on the growth, physio-chemical attributes and yields of Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants by the combined application of salicylic acid and Moringa oleifera leaf extract. Sci Hortic. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rattan RK, Patel KP, Manjaiah KM, Datta SP. Micronutrients in soil, plant, animal and human health. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324497356_Micronutrients_in_soils_plants_animals_and_humans. Accessed 14 July 2023.

  56. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1009/oj. Accessed 25 June 2023.

  57. Rehman H, Alharby HF, Alzahrani Y, Rady MM. Magnesium and organic biostimulant integrative application induces physiological and biochemical changes in sun flower plants and its harvested progeny on sandy soil. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Reinbothe S, Reinbothe C, Parthier B. Methyl jasmonate regulated translation of nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Salome). J BioI Chern. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82241-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Reinbothe S, Reinbothe C, Heintzen C, Seidenbecher C, Parthier B. A methyl jasmonate-induced shift in the length of the 5′ untranslated region impairs translation of the plastid rbcL transcript in barley. EMBO J. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05794.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Ribeiro ABM, Bruzi AT, Zuffo AM, Zambiazzi EV, Soares IO, Vilela NJD. Productive performance of soybean cultivars grown in different plant densities. Cienc Rural. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ricker KE, Bostock RM. Eicosanoids in the Phytophthora infestans-potato interaction: lipoxygenase metabolism of arachidonic acid and biological activities of selected lipoxygenase products. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-5765(05)80095-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Römheld V, Marschner H. Function of micronutrients in plants. Micronutr Agric. 1991. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser4.2ed.c9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rouphael Y, Colla G. Synergistic biostimulatory action: designing the next generation of plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Rouphael Y, Giordano M, Cardarelli M, Cozzolino E, Mori M, Kyriacou MC, et al. Plant-and seaweed-based extracts increase yield but differentially modulate nutritional quality of greenhouse spinach through biostimulant action. Agronomy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8070126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rouphael Y, Kyriacou MC, Petropoulos SA, De Pascale S, Colla G. Improving vegetable quality in controlled environments. Sci Hortic. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sami F, Yusuf M, Faizan M, Faraz A, Hayat S. Role of sugars under abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Santi C, Zamboni A, Varanini Z, Pandolfini T. Growth stimulatory effects and genome-wide transcriptional changes produced by protein hydrolysates in maize seedlings. Front Plant Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Schweizer P, Gees R, Mosinger E. Effect of jasmonic acid on the interaction of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with the powdery mildew Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Plant Physiol. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.2.503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Semida WM, Rady MM. Presoaking application of propolis and maize grain extracts alleviates salinity stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci Hortic. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.01.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sharma HSS, Selby C, Carmichael E, McRoberts C, Rao JR, Ambrosino P. Physicochemical analyses of plant biostimulant formulations and characterisation of commercial products by instrumental techniques. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0064-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sobko O, Hartung J, Zikeli S, Claupein W, Gruber S. Effect of sowing density on grain yield, protein and oil content and plant morphology of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Plant Soil Environ. 2019. https://doi.org/10.17221/346/2019-PSE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sugiyama A. The soybean rhizosphere: metabolites, microbes, and beyond—a review. J Adv Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Szczepanek M, Siwik-Ziomek A. P and K accumulation by rapeseed as affected by biostimulant under different NPK and S fertilization doses. Agronomy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Szparaga A, Czerwińska E, Piskier T. The effect of treating the seeds of Brassica oleracea L. with aqueous extracts on the germination capacity and seed healthiness. J Res Appl Agric Eng. 2017;62:162–7.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Szparaga A, Kocira S, Findura P, Kapusta I, Zaguła G, Świeca M. Uncovering the multi-level response of Glycine max L. to the application of allelopathic biostimulant from Levisticum officinale Koch. Sci Rep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94774-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Szparaga A, Kocira S, Kapusta I, Zaguła G. Prototyping extracts from Artemisia absinthium L. for their biostimulating properties yield-enhancing, and farmer income-increasing properties. Ind Crops Prod. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Szparaga A, Kocira S, Kocira A, Czerwińska E, Świeca M, Lorencowicz E, Kornas R, Koszel M, Oniszczuk T. Modification of growth, yield, and the nutraceutical and antioxidative potential of soybean through the use of synthetic biostimulants. Front Plant Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Teixeira WF, Fagan EB, Soares LH, Umburanas RC, Reichardt K, Neto DD. Foliar and seed application of amino acids affects the antioxidant metabolism of the soybean crop. Front Plant Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Winter G, Todd CD, Trovato M, Forlani G, Funck D. Physiological implications of arginine metabolism in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Yang J, Wen C, Duan Y, Deng Q, Peng D, Zhang H, Ma H. The composition, extraction, analysis, bioactivities, bioavailability and application in food system of flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) oil: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.09.025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Zaguła G, Bajcar M, Saletnik B, Czernicka M, Puchalski C, Kapusta I, Oszmiański J. Comparison of the effectiveness of water-based extraction of substances from dry tea leaves with the use of magnetic field assisted extraction techniques. Molecules. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Zaka SM, Iqbal N, Saeed Q, Akrem A, Batool M, Khan AA. Toxic effects of some insecticides, herbicides, and plant essential oils against Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du val (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhang H, Wang Z, Liu O. Development and validation of a GC–FID method for quantitative analysis of oleic acid and related fatty acids. J Pharm Anal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2015.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agrobiotechnology, Koszalin University of Technology, Racławicka 15–17, 75-620, Koszalin, Poland

    Agnieszka Szparaga

  2. Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

    Agnieszka Szparaga

  3. Department of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950, Lublin, Poland

    Sławomir Kocira

  4. Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

    Sławomir Kocira

  5. Department of Food Technology and Human Nutrition, College of Natural Science, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 St., 35-601, Rzeszow, Poland

    Ireneusz Kapusta

  6. Department of Bioenergetics and Food Analysis, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 St., 35-601, Rzeszow, Poland

    Grzegorz Zaguła

Authors
  1. Agnieszka Szparaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sławomir Kocira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ireneusz Kapusta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Grzegorz Zaguła
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, AS and SK; methodology, AS, SK, IK, and GZ; formal analysis, AS and SK; investigation, SK, IK, and GZ; writing—original draft, AS and SK; writing—review and editing, SK and AS; visualization, SK; resources, SK, IK and GZ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sławomir Kocira.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

This research has been confirmed for publication in the journal.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Figure S1

. Rainfall in the months of field research realization in 2017–2019 and multi-year average.

Additional file 2. Figure S2

. Temperature in the months of field research realization in 2017–2019 and multi-year average.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szparaga, A., Kocira, S., Kapusta, I. et al. Solid–liquid extraction of bioactive compounds as a green alternative for developing novel biostimulant from Linum usitatissimum L.. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00482-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00482-9

Keywords