Skip to main content

Effects of combinational mycelia obtained via in vitro culture on ageing and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster and their mechanisms

Abstract

This research serves to investigate the effects of mycelium combinations obtained by in vitro culture of Amanita virgineoides Bas, Phallus rubicundus (Bosc) Fr., and Lepista nuda (Bull.) Cooke fruiting bodies on ageing and reproduction of Drosophila melanogaster and their underlying mechanisms. The ageing effect was most pronounced in the A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus combination group, with a maximum mortality rate of 18.33% at 6 h. The catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, as well as the transcripts of the longevity genes Nrf2 and Hep, were significantly downregulated to minima at 9 and 18 h, respectively. The malondialdehyde (MDA) content and transcripts of the signalling pathway-related genes Keap-1, TOR, and S6K as well as the longevity gene MTH were significantly upregulated to maximum levels. This corrected mortality reached 55.49%, with the lowest performance in terms of mean lifespan, maximal mean lifespan, median lethal time and flyability (15.00%) observed in the offspring at 24 h. In the group receiving a combination of A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda, the adult pupae quantity, adult fly quantity, and adult fly rate were the lowest at 14.33%, 4.00%, and 27.63%, respectively. In addition, the adult fly rate reached only 32.32% of that of the control group, and the highest aberration rate (47.78%) was also observed in the offspring. The mycelia of A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, and L. nuda all demonstrated toxicity against D. melanogaster, and the combinations of different macrofungal mycelia had a synergistic effect regarding their toxicity. The data reported in the present study—particularly when using A. virgineoides and P. rubicundus with potential insecticidal activity against D. melanogaster—are novel.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

The insect pest Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera, Drosophilidae) has a wide host range, reproduces rapidly, and has the capability of surviving under various climatic conditions. This species has been conducive to the worldwide spread of economically harmful insects [1]. Chemical fly pesticide utilization is not a sustainable strategy because of administrative limitations and the potential for resistance to insecticides [2, 3]. Many plant and fungal compounds possess marked biological activities related to the presence of secondary metabolites [4, 5]. Amanita muscaria (L.: Fr.) Pers. ex Hook. (Agaricales, Amanitaceae) (fly agaric) is capable of catching flies while soaked in water or milk [6]. A. muscaria is used against the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera, Culicidae) [7]. In addition, in 175 tested species of fungi, 79 were discovered to impede insect development [8]. The observed results prove that some fungi include antifeedant, repellent and even poisonous compounds that act against Sitophilus zeamais [9], Drosophila melanogaster, Tribolium castaneum [10], Leptinotarsa decemlineata [11], and Plutella xylostella [12].

One uncommon amino acid of Amanita virgineoides Bas impedes the spore germination of Pyricularia oryzae Cav., the cause of rice blast disease [13]. The secondary metabolites of Phallaceae have anti-inflammatory [14], immune-enhancing [15], and anticancer activities [16], as well as α-glucosidase inhibitory potential [17]. Recent studies have shown that Lepista nuda (Bull.) Cooke possesses a variety of pharmacological functions, such as anti-tumour activity [18]. L. nuda extracts have already been reported to impede biofilm production [19] and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase [20] to some degree. In Clitocybe genus fruiting bodies, extracts have already been reported to show powerful insecticidal activation [21]. Moreover, L. nuda has shown insecticidal activation against the larvae of D. melanogaster [22].

Prior researchers have indicated that D. melanogaster exposure to 3 Gy electron beam irradiation, the rare-earth element cerium (Ce) and 15 mM paraquat (Pq) can trigger oxygen stress, which specifically manifested as an obvious increase in the content of malondialdehyde (MDA). Furthermore, the radiation/Pq/Ce-induced free radicals can in turn impair the antioxidant defence systems, causing a decrease in catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as well as glutathione (GSH) levels. Moreover, Pq-treated flies showed serious locomotor impairments, with 84% of flies incapable of flying [23]. There was an obvious reduction in maximum lifespan, mean lifespan and reproductive output as doses of cerium increased [24]. Recent studies have shown that metabolic signalling pathways are capable of mediating longevity and age [25]. Target of rapamycin (TOR) is an essential regulator of cellular proliferation and impacts senescence, and S6K is just one downstream TOR kinase effector. TOR and S6K are involved in the age-related signalling pathway, while Nrf2/Keap-1 is involved in the intrinsic stress protection system [26]. The Jun kinase (JNK) signalling pathway indirectly participates in the cell oxygenated stress reaction and increases longevity. Hep is a homologue of Jun kinase kinase (JNKK), and D. melanogaster with the Hep mutation was shown to be more sensitive to oxidation stress and to have shorter longevity [27].

To date, the molecular mechanism by which Amanita kills flies has not been sufficiently studied, and Amanita, being highly toxic, may pose a threat to the environment and humans. It is worth exploring whether there are any macrofungi among edible or medicinal mushrooms that are beneficial to humans and have the same fly killing activity as Amanita. Adopting in vitro culture decreases the overexploitation of extremely rare, valuable, or endangered species, presenting a methodology that gives priority to sustainable safeguards and consideration of biodiversity [28]. In this study, the combinational mycelia of A. virgineoides, Phallus rubicundus (Bosc) Fr., and L. nuda were procured by means of in vitro culture and checked for adverse impacts against D. melanogaster. In addition, their influences on the lifespan, fecundity, growth and development characteristics of offspring, peroxide content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and transcription of genes related to signalling pathways and lifespan of D. melanogaster were contrasted. This research was performed to provide a reference for macrofungus advancement and application.

Materials and methods

Materials

Insects

Captured in one local orchard of cherry (114° E, 31° N), adult wild-type D. melanogaster were grown on typical yeast medium with corn and bred inside one light hatcher at 25 ± 1 ℃ under 55% relative humidity with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. Virgin flies that had never mated were selected for the study.

Macrofungus strains

A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, and L. nuda originated in fallen leaves during the summer of 2021 in the forests of the Chinese Ta-pieh Mountains. These mushrooms were identified in a field survey by comparison with previously prepared herbarium samples. Taxonomic determination was performed by Shanghai Yuanxin Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.

Methods

Isolation and purification of mycelia

The macrofungal fruiting bodies were germfree, cultured on PDA by isolating the tissue, and grown at 26 ℃. Well-grown slant strains were inoculated into PD in vitro medium with no agar, placed in a rotating shaker, and cultured for 6 days at 28 ℃ with 130 r/min. After in vitro culture, the mycelia were collected by centrifugation at 6000 r/min for 20 min, washed three times with distilled water, and dried to a constant weight at 50 ℃; in addition, the mycelia were weighed.

Combinations and experimental grouping of macrofungal mycelia

The mycelia attained from in vitro culture were blended at a mass proportion of 1:4 with purified water, homogenized by ultrasonic (240 W) crushing for 1 h, sealed, and bottled at 4 ℃. The treatment medium was set based upon the yeast medium with corn, which was regarded as the control (CK). A (A. virgineoides), B (P. rubicundus), C (L. nuda), D (A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus), E (A. virgineoides + L. nuda), F (P. rubicundus + L. nuda), and G (A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda) were established as 7 experimental treatments. Treatments A, B, and C used a single macrofungal mycelium type, while treatments D, E, F, and G used two or more mycelia. The mass ratio of mycelia from different macrofungi was 1:1. In the experiments, 30% of the original mass of distilled water and corn flour in the foundational medium was removed; in addition, the masses were matched to the mass of macrofungal mycelium homogenate. Over the course of configuration, the homogenate was mixed with yeast powder; the medium was separated into 100 mL triangular flasks.

Determination of the ageing effect on D. melanogaster

Two male and two female virgin flies that had been starved for 8 h were placed into the bottles. A total of 80 flies were chosen for every experimental treatment and incubated at 25 ℃. After being placed in bottles, they were surveyed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. The number of dead flies was determined. The corrected mortality rate (CMR, %) and mortality rate (MR, %) were determined on the basis of the formulae below:

$$ {\text{MR}}\, = \,{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{dead}}\,{\text{flies}}/{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{test}}\,{\text{flies}}\, \times \,{1}00\% $$
(1)
$$ {\text{CMR}}\, = \,\left( {{\text{treatment}}\,{\text{mortality}}\, - \,{\text{control}}\,{\text{mortality}}} \right)\,/\,\left( {{1}\, - \,{\text{control}}\,{\text{mortality}}} \right)\, \times \,{1}00\% $$
(2)

Measurement of D. melanogaster lifespan

The virgin flies placed in treatment medium were surveyed and counted every 6 h. After flies had been reared for 24 h with the macrofungal treatment medium, the surviving flies were switched to the yeast medium with corn for additional rearing. The pupae were transferred again to yeast medium with corn, where they remained until their deaths. The median lethal time (LT50, h), mean lifespan (MLS, h), maximum mean lifespan (MMLS, h), and lifespan inhibition rate (LIR, %) were determined using the formulae below:

$$ {\text{LT}}_{{{5}0}} \, = \,{\text{the}}\,{\text{time}}\,{\text{at}}\,{\text{which}}\,{\text{half}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{fliesdied}} $$
(3)
$$ {\text{MLS}}\, = \,{\text{the}}\,{\text{sum}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{survival}}\,{\text{times}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{allflies}}\,{\text{in}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{treatment}}\,/\,{\text{quantity}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{flies}}\,{\text{in}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{treatment}} $$
(4)
$$ {\text{MMLS}}\, = \,{\text{the}}\,{\text{mean}}\,{\text{lifespan}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{ten}}\,{\text{longest}}\, - \,{\text{surviving}}\,{\text{flies}}\,{\text{in}}\,{\text{a}}\,{\text{given}}\,{\text{treatment}} $$
(5)
$$ {\text{LIR}}\, = \,\left( {{\text{mean}}\,{\text{lifespan}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{control}}\,{\text{flies}}\, - \,{\text{mean}}\,{\text{lifespan}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{experimental}}\,{\text{flies}}} \right)\,/\,{\text{mean}}\,{\text{lifespan}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{control}}\,{\text{flies}}\, \times \,{1}00\% $$
(6)

Measurement of D. melanogaster reproductive capacity

The numbers of newly formed pupae and adult flies per bottle per day were recorded from the day on which the offspring generation formed pupae on the bottle wall until there were no more pupae or flies being formed. The quantity of flies and pupae was determined; in addition, the rate of flies per female was determined by the formulae below:

$$ {\text{The}}\,{\text{rate}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{flies}}\, = \,{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{flies}}\,/\,{\text{number}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{pupae}}\, \times \,{1}00\% $$
(7)

Measurement of growth and developmental characteristics of D. melanogaster offspring

The offspring of D. melanogaster were collected at 24 h after hatching, and their phenotypes were observed under a microscope after anaesthesia with ether. The number of aberrations in female and male flies was recorded, and their body lengths were measured using an eyepiece micrometer. Two hours after awakening, the flies were released outdoors, and those that could take off normally were scored as "flyable". Finally, the sex ratio (♀:♂), body length, aberration rate, and flyability were counted.

Determination of antioxidant enzyme activity and peroxidation product content in D. melanogaster

Next, 100 mg of male and female flies grown with the treatment medium for 9 h and 18 h was weighed. Every group of flies was blended with 0.9 mL of saline solution and homogenized at 2000 r/min for 10 s in an ice bath for an interval of 10 s. The mixture was repeated 3 times to generate a homogenate. The activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, as well as the content of MDA, were normalized by sample protein values.

Determination of the corresponding quantity of transcripts in D. melanogaster

Total mRNA was obtained from D. melanogaster by the TRIzol approach as described in the TRIzol kit’s instructions (Invitrogen). cDNA synthesis was performed according to the instructions for the PrimeScript RT‒PCR Kit. The primer sequences adopted for quantitative analysis were generated by Shanghai Meiji Biomedical Technology Co. and are listed in Table 1. Fluorescence real-time quantitative PCR was carried out by means of QuantStudio 3 real-time quantitative PCR. The reagents employed were those included in the DyNAmo SYBRR Green qPCR Kit; in addition, experimental operations were implemented on the basis of the reagent instructions. Data were collected and managed with CFX-Manager; in addition, corresponding expression levels of internal reference and target genes were determined with the Ct (2Ct) approach [29]. Using ribosomal protein (RP49) as an internal reference gene, high-throughput fluorescent quantitative PCR was adopted to determine the corresponding quantities of transcripts of lifespan-related genes, such as hemipterus (Hep), nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), and methuselah (MTH) and signalling-pathway-related genes.

Table 1 qRT‒PCR primer sequences for lifespan-related and signalling pathway-related genes

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated 3 times; the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of every sample. For comparisons of the means of treatment groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, using SPSS v26 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). In the figures, different lowercase letters between similar columns indicate least significant differences (LSDs) between treatments at the 5% level (P < 0.05). The antioxidant levels and gene expression levels were statistically analysed with two-way ANOVA to determine the effect of each factor and the effects of their interactions.

Results

Ageing influences of combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on D. melanogaster

A longevity assay was performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the ageing of flies. Male and female flies were reared on a diet supplemented with the mycelia of seven combinations of macrofungi. Table 2 shows the numbers of fly deaths that occurred in the seven treatment groups at 6 h. Only treatment B showed no significant difference; the mortality in the other six treatment significantly increased compared with that of the control. The mortality of flies in each experimental group showed an upwards trend with extension of the time spent feeding on macrofungal mycelia. The corrected mortality in treatment D was the most elevated at 24 h (55.49%), and that in treatment B was the least elevated (18.65%) (P < 0.05).

Table 2 Mean (± SD) mortality rate (MR) and corrected mortality rate (CMR) of Drosophila melanogaster receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets lasting for 6, 12, 18, and 24 h

Effects of combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the longevity of D. melanogaster

The inhibition rates and lifespans of the flies after receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets for 24 h are shown in Table 3. Table 3 shows that, in contrast to the control, the seven combinations of macrofungal mycelia reduced the LT50, MLS, and MMLS of the flies. Moreover, the differences were significant compared with the control (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, there were no obvious differences in LT50 and MLS among treatments A, C, D, E, F, and G. The LT50, MLS, and MMLS in treatment D were the lowest, while those in treatment B were the highest, with differences of 46, 52.9, and 108.2 h, respectively. The lifespan inhibition rate in the seven treatments was 94.64 ~ 98.29%. There was no obvious difference in the lifespan inhibition rate between treatments A and G, but there were significant differences between the others.

Table 3 Mean (± SD) median lethal time (LT50, h), mean lifespan (MLS, h), maximum mean lifespan (MMLS, h), lifespan inhibition rate (LIR, %) of D. melanogaster receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets lasting for 24 h

Influences of combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the fecundity of D. melanogaster

A reproduction assay was performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the fertility of flies. The pupa number, adult fly number, and adult fly rate decreased significantly after the flies received combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets compared with the control (P < 0.05) (Table 4). As shown in Table 4, the toxicity of treatment G was the strongest, and the numbers of pupae and adult flies and the adult fly rate were the lowest at 14.33%, 4.00%, and 27.63%, respectively—with the last value being only 32.32% of that in the control. Treatment B had the weakest inhibitory effect on the fecundity of flies, with an adult fly rate of 62.17–72.72% of that in the control.

Table 4 Means (± SD) the pupa number, adult fly number, and adult fly rate of D. melanogaster receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets

Influences of combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the growth and development characteristics of D. melanogaster offspring

Microscopy and behavioural assays were performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the growth and development characteristics of offspring. Table 5 shows that in contrast to that in the control, the sex ratio in treatment A was as high as 2.17, while those in the other six treatments showed no significant differences compared to that in the control. The body length of flies in treatment E was the smallest, at only 2.14 mm, which was 0.32 mm less than that of flies in the control. The flyability of flies in the seven treatment groups decreased significantly compared with that in the control group; furthermore, treatment D had the lowest value, at only 15.00%. The aberration rate of the seven treatment groups increased compared with that in the control group, with treatment G presenting the highest rate (47.78%). In addition, in contrast to that in the control, the aberration rates in treatments A, D, E, and G increased significantly.

Table 5 Mean (± SD) sex ratio, body length, flyability, aberration rate of D. melanogaster receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets

Influences of combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and the content of peroxides in D. melanogaster

An antioxidant assay was performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the oxidation level of flies. A two-way ANOVA with three factors could fully explain the main effects of sex, time and treatment as well as the interaction effect among the three variables (R square > 0.98). Moreover, the effects of sex, time, treatment, sex*treatment and time*treatment were significant for SOD, CAT and MDA (P < 0.05), while the interaction effects of sex*time and sex*time*treatment were not significant for CAT and MDA (P > 0.05) but were significant on SOD (P < 0.05).

Figure 1 shows that, compared to those in the control, the CAT and SOD activities in treatments A, D, and G decreased significantly, while those in treatment B increased significantly after flies received combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets for 9 and 18 h. The antioxidant enzyme activities in treatments C, E, and F were different due to different culture times, sexes, and enzyme types. The SOD activity in treatment D was the lowest at 18 h, with values of 12.83 U mg−1 for female flies and 13.89 U mg−1 for male flies. Moreover, the CAT activity in treatment D was also the lowest, with values of 43.06 U mg−1 for female flies and 36.76 U mg−1 for male flies.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean (± SD) the activity of CAT, SOD, the content of MDA of D. melanogaster receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets for 18, 9 h. The means labelled by different letters are significantly different between treatment groups at P < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). CK—the control group—received an ordinary diet with no combinational macrofungal mycelia. Flies in treatments A, B, C, D, E, F, and G received a mycelium-supplemented diet with A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, L. nuda, A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus, A. virgineoides + L. nuda, P. rubicundus + L. nuda, and A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda, respectively

The MDA content of flies in the seven treatments increased significantly at 18 h, and the MDA content in treatment D was the highest at 42.06 nmol/mg for female flies and 53.66 nmol/mg for male flies. Treatment G increased the most at 18 h compared with the values found at 9 h, with a 60.95% increase in female flies and a 48.2% increase in male flies.

Influences of the combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the transcription levels of genes related to signalling pathways in D. melanogaster

A real-time PCR assay was performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the transcript levels of genes related to signalling pathways of flies. A two-way ANOVA with three factors could fully explain the main effects of sex, time and treatment as well as the interaction effect among the three variables (R square > 0.95). Moreover, the one-way main effect of sex was nonsignificant for TOR; the two-way interaction effect of sex*treatment was not nonsignificant for S6K and TOR; sex*treatment had a nonsignificant effect on Keap-1; and the three-way interaction effect of sex*time*treatment was nonsignificant for S6K and Keap-1 (P > 0.05).

Figure 2 shows that the levels of Keap-1, TOR, and S6K gene transcripts in female and male flies increased at 18 h compared with 9 h. In addition, the levels of S6K, TOR and Keap-1 transcription among treatments A, C, D, E, F, and G were significantly increased at 18 h compared to those in the control. The levels of S6K, TOR, and Keap-1 transcription in treatment D were the highest, and the levels in male flies were 0.24, 0.25, and 0.56 times greater than those in female flies, respectively. The level of TOR transcription increased most significantly among the three signalling pathway genes. The fold changes in TOR transcripts in female and male flies in treatment D compared with the control were 3.42 and 3.67 at 18 h, respectively, having increased by 0.8 and 1.45 times compared with those found at 9 h.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean (± SD) the corresponding quantities of the transcriptions of the signalling pathway-related genes receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets for 9, 18 h. The means labelled by different letters are significantly different between treatment groups at P < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). CK—the control group—received an ordinary diet with no combinational macrofungal mycelia. Flies in treatments A, B, C, D, E, F, and G received a mycelium-supplemented diet with A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, L. nuda, A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus, A. virgineoides + L. nuda, P. rubicundus + L. nuda, and A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda, respectively

Influences of the combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets on the transcript levels of lifespan-related genes in D. melanogaster

A real-time PCR assay was performed to determine the influence of mycelia on the transcription of genes related to the lifespan of flies. A two-way ANOVA with three factors could fully explain the main effects of sex, time and treatment as well as the interaction effect among the three variables (R square > 0.95). Moreover, the two-way interaction of sex*time had a nonsignificant effect on Hep; the three-way interaction of sex*time*treatment had a nonsignificant effect on Hep, Nrf2 and MTH (P > 0.05).

Figure 3 shows that the transcription levels of the lifespan-related Nrf2 and Hep genes were reduced significantly in treatments A, D, E, and G at 9 and 18 h compared with the control. Furthermore, they showed differences in treatments B, C, and F due to different feeding times, sexes, and gene types. The levels of Hep and Nrf2 transcripts decreased and the level of MTH transcripts increased at 18 h compared with those observed at 9 h. The level of MTH transcripts in all seven treatment groups increased significantly at 18 h compared with that in the control, with that in treatment D—3.34 and 3.6 times higher for the female and male flies, respectively—being the highest.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mean (± SD) the corresponding quantities of lifespan-related genes transcriptions, like hemipterus (Hep) of D. melanogaster, nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2), methuselah (MTH) receiving combinational macrofungal mycelium-supplemented diets for 18, 9 h. The means labelled by different letters are significantly different between treatment groups at P < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). CK—the control group—received an ordinary diet with no combinational macrofungal mycelia. Flies in treatments A, B, C, D, E, F, and G received a mycelium-supplemented diet with A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, L. nuda, A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus, A. virgineoides + L. nuda, P. rubicundus + L. nuda, and A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda, respectively

Discussion

In this study, the mycelium of A. virgineoides, which is a common local species, was added to treatment medium and then fed to D. melanogaster. Both the experimental group fed only A. virgineoides mycelium (treatment A) and its combinational treatment groups (treatments D, E, and G) showed an ageing effect on D. melanogaster (Table 2). Therefore, A. virgineoides, which is similar to the other macrofungi of Amanita, can disrupt the antioxidant system, upregulate the transcription of genes related to signalling pathways, inhibit the expression of longevity-related genes, and reduce the lifespan and fertility of D. melanogaster. The toxic peptides amanitin and phalloidins identified in a case of phalloides syndrome due to poisoning caused by mushrooms [30] were found not only in A. phalloides but also in 3 other Amanita species, 8 species of Galerina, and 11 Lepiota species [31]. Our results are similar to those of previous studies showing that low α-amanitin concentrations negatively impact larva-to-adult progression time, pre-adult viability, adult body size, and adult longevity [32]. These results may be because pantheric acids A–C in poisonous mushrooms promote lipid accumulation in adipocytes [33]. It has already been supported that activation of TOR [34] and S6K [35] expression is capable of decreasing the lifespan by means of rapamycin in D. melanogaster, which corresponds to the results of the current research. The Methuselah (MTH) gene has long been thought to be a key longevity element. Moreover, diverse studies have shown that overexpression of the MTH gene in D. melanogaster can shorten lifespan [36].

To date, researchers have isolated and identified the structures of compounds, such as metalloprotease [37], bisabolane sesquiterpene [38], chloro-substituted pentenamide [39], lignoren and harziandion [38] from A. phalloides. In Korea, A. phalloides is commercially available and cooked in water for consumption due to its high content of glutamic acid, monosodium glutamate-like compounds, and total 5′-nucleotides [40]. This indicates that A. phalloides is safe for humans and the environment, provided it is appropriately handled.

It is evident that A. phalloides possesses promising applications for the development of biogenic insecticides. However, D. melanogaster has developed ibotenic acid [41] and α-amanitin resistance over a long period of evolution. These characteristics are associated with cytochrome P450 activity [42] and not with the gut microbiota [43]. A former study revealed that toxin entry blockage by means of the cuticle, stage I and II detoxification, and sequestration inside lipid particles, along with the proteolytic cleavage of α-amanitin, contribute to the quantitative trait [44].

To identify more medicinal fungal resources that can be used to kill flies and thus solve the problem of α-amanitin resistance in D. melanogaster, this study also selected the mycelium of P. rubicundus and L. nuda, which are common locally. Combinational treatment media with the mycelium of A. virgineoides were configured and then fed to D. melanogaster. The results showed that the ageing effect of the D (A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus) combinational treatment was the strongest, with the highest mortality rate of 18.33% in D. melanogaster at 6 h. After receiving a mycelium-supplemented diet for 24 h, flies exhibited a mortality rate as high as 55.49% (Table 2), with the lowest LT50, MLS, and MMLS (Table 3) and the lowest flyability (15.00%) found in the offspring generation (Table 5). Recent studies have shown that lactones [45], lucidenic acid O, lectins [46], fungal cyclic peptides [47], and haemolysins in mushrooms are potential natural insecticides. Cnispin, a protease inhibitor that impedes the serine protease trypsin, is poisonous to D. melanogaster. Clitocine, a new nucleoside, has shown powerful insecticidal activation against the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella [48]. If the compounds in macrofungi with insecticidal activity can be isolated and identified in the future, this information will help reveal the molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic action of several key molecules in killing flies and provide a reference for the development of fly killing pesticides.

The lowest numbers of adult pupae and adult flies and the lowest adult fly rate were recorded in the G (A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus + L. nuda) combinational treatment, at 14.33%, 4.00%, and 27.63%, respectively (Table 4). This was in addition to the highest aberration rate of 47.78% observed in the offspring generation (Table 5), which showed that the combination of different macrofungal mycelia could have a synergistic toxic effect. Although the fungi of Phallaceae have a special strong flavour that attracts flies and insects to feed on their spores (which then spread them through faeces, thus forming a mutually beneficial relationship between the fungus and the insect), this study concluded that a P. rubicundus mycelium-supplemented diet was adverse to D. melanogaster, especially when combined with A. virgineoides mycelium. This may be because the feeding stimulants were used together with insecticides to increase the dosage and treatment effects. The addition of 0.1% sucrose to acetamiprid, spinetoram, spinosad, and cyantraniliprole was demonstrated to decrease the LC50, leading to higher and earlier adult SWD mortality and a reduction in larval infestation [49].

In this study, the mycelia of A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, and L. nuda were selected for the ageing test and yielded certain effects. These research results filled a knowledge gap in this field (Fig. 4). Previous research on fly mortality was limited to large fungal fruiting bodies. This study provides an application idea for the exploitation of macrofungi that cannot yet be cultivated on a large scale in plantations.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic diagram of effects of combinational mycelia obtained via in vitro culture on ageing and reproduction in D. melanogaster and their mechanisms

Conclusions

In summary, the findings of this research, which examined the effects OF diets supplemented with mycelia of A. virgineoides, P. rubicundus, and L. nuda and their combinations on D. melanogaster, showed that they all exerted ageing effects on D. melanogaster, with the most pronounced ageing effect found for the A. virgineoides + P. rubicundus combination. This combination was able to significantly reduce the activity of antioxidant enzymes, increase the accumulation of peroxidation products, upregulate the transcription of genes associated with age-related signalling pathways, inhibit the expression of longevity genes, reduce the lifespan and fertility of D. melanogaster, and adversely affect the offspring. These achievements provide a reference for the application of macrofungi for the discovery of biogenic fly killing pesticides.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

HIV-1:

Human immunodeficiency virus-1

Pq:

Paraquat

Ce:

Cerium

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

CAT:

Catalase

GSH:

Glutathione

MR:

Mortality rate

CMR:

Corrected mortality rate

LT50 :

Median lethal time

MLS:

Mean lifespan

MMLS:

Maximum mean lifespan

LIR:

Lifespan inhibition rate

cDNA:

Complementary DNA

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

mRNA:

Messenger ribonucleic acid

RNase:

Ribonuclease

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RT–PCR:

Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

MTH :

Methuselah

Nrf2 :

Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2

Hep :

Hemipterus

S6K :

RPS6-p70-protein kinase

TOR :

Target of rapamycin

Keap-1 :

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

LSD:

Least significant differences

SWD:

Spotted wing Drosophila

D. melanogaster :

Drosophila melanogaster

A. virgineoides :

Amanita virgineoides Bas

P. rubicundus :

Phallus rubicundus (Bosc) Fr.

L. nuda :

Lepista nuda (Bull.) Cooke

A. muscaria :

Amanita muscaria (L.: Fr.) Pers. ex Hook

References

  1. Curtsinger JW. Reproductive homeostasis and senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. J Gerontol Ser A. 2019;74:1533–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Timmeren S, Mota-Sanchez D, Wise JC, Isaacs R. Baseline susceptibility of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii ) to four key insecticide classes. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deans C, Hutchison WD. Propensity for resistance development in the invasive berry pest, spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii ), under laboratory selection. Pest Manag Sci. 2022;78:5203–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cespedes CL, Alarcon J, Aqueveque PM, Lobo T, Becerra J, Balbontin C, Avila JG, Kubo I, Seigler DS. New environmentally-friendly antimicrobials and biocides from Andean and Mexican biodiversity. Environ Res. 2015;142:549–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.08.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damalas C, Koutroubas S. Current status and recent developments in biopesticide use. Agriculture. 2018;8:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8010013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lumpert M, Kreft S. Catching flies with Amanita muscaria: traditional recipes from Slovenia and their efficacy in the extraction of ibotenic acid. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;187:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.04.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cárcamo MC, Carapeto LP, Duarte JP, Bernardi E, Ribeiro PB. Larvicidal efficiency of the mushroom Amanita muscaria (Agaricales, Amanitaceae) against the mosquito Culexquinquefasciatus (Diptera, Culicidae). Rev Soc Bras Med Tro. 2016;49:95–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0175-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mier N, Canete S, Klaebe A, Chavant L, Fournier D. Insecticidal properties of mushroom and toadstool carpophores. Phytochemistry. 1996;41:1293–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00773-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palavecino-De-La-Fuente F, Silva-Aguayo G, Figueroa-Cares I, Gerding M, Rodriguez-Maciel JC, Lagunes-Tejeda A, Castaneda-Ramirez GS, Sotelo-Leyva C, Curkovic T, Aguilar-Marcelino L. Insecticidal effect of hydroalcoholic extracts of Pleurotus ostreatus against Sitophilus zeamais. Chil J Agr Res. 2022;82:399–406. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392022000300399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riahi H, Sargazi F, Sheidai M. Insecticidal activities of Ling Zhi or Reishi medicinal mushroom, Ganoderma lucidum (W. Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst. (Aphyllophoromycetideae) extract against Tribolium castaneum and Drosophila melanogaster. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2009;11:329–34. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v11.i3.110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kryukov VY, Yaroslavtseva ON, Dubovskiy IM, Tyurin MV, Kryukova NA, Glupov VV. Insecticidal and immunosuppressive effect of ascomycete Cordyceps militaris on the larvae of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Biol Bull. 2014;41:276–83. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359014020046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J, Yeon S, Kim H, Ahn Y. Larvicidal activity against Plutella xylostella of cordycepin from the fruiting body of Cordyceps militaris. Pest Manag Sci. 2002;58:713–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohta T, Nakajima S, Sato Z, Aoki T, Hatanaka S, Nozoe S. Cyclopropylalanine, an antifungal amino acid of the mushroom Amanita virgineoides Bas. Chem Lett. 1986;22:511–2. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1986.511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jianhua L, Lan Y, Shiyu L, Jing D, Mingyu Y, Dongyu F, Changtian L, Fenghua T, Yu L. New aniline derivatives from the volva of Phallus rubrovolvatus and their anti-inflammatory activity. Bioorg Chem. 2022;119:105577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOORG.2021.105577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chaiyama V, Keawsompong S, LeBlanc JG, de LeBlanc ADM, Chatel J, Chanput W. Action modes of the immune modulating activities of crude mushroom polysaccharide from Phallus atrovolvatus. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre. 2020;23:100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcdf.2020.100216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ker Y, Chen K, Peng C, Hsieh C, Peng RY. Structural characteristics and antioxidative capability of the soluble polysaccharides present in Dictyophora Indusiata (Vent. Ex Pers.) Fish Phallaceae. Evid-Based Compl Alt. 2011;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neq041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SR, Lee D, Lee BS, Ryoo R, Pang C, Kang KS, Kim KH. Phallac acids A and B, new sesquiterpenes from the fruiting bodies of Phallus luteus. J Antibiot. 2020;73:729–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0328-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beattie KD, Ulrich R, Grice ID, Uddin SJ, Blake TB, Wood KA, Steele J, Iu F, May TW, Tiralongo E. Ethanolic and aqueous extracts derived from Australian fungi inhibit cancer cell growth in vitro. Mycologia. 2011;103:458–65. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alves M, Ferreira I, Lourenço I, Costa E, Martins A, Pintado M. Wild mushroom extracts as inhibitors of bacterial biofilm formation. Pathogens. 2014;3:667–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens3030667.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu M, Zhang G, Meng L, Wang H, Gao K, Ng T. Purification and characterization of a white laccase with pronounced dye decolorizing ability and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitory activity from Lepista nuda. Molecules. 2016;21:415. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pohleven J, Kos J, Sabotic J. Medicinal properties of the genus Clitocybe and of lectins from the clouded funnel cap mushroom, C. nebularis (Agaricomycetes): a review. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2016;18:965–75. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.v18.i11.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ming W, Ueros VT, Paquereau L, Chavant L, Fournier D, Trigueros V, Paquereau L, Chavant L, Fournier D. Proteins as active compounds involved in insecticidal activity of mushroom fruitbodies. J Econ Entomol. 2002;95:603–7. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.3.603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manjula PS, Sarojini BK, Darshan Raj CG, Sanjeev G. In vivo antioxidative stress measurement of a 1, 2, 4-Triazole derivative in Drosophila melanogaster oregon K flies. Der Pharma Chemica. 2015;7:70–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang S, Li Z, Wang X, Wang Q, Hu F. Cerium caused life span shortening and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2010;73:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.09.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei Y, Zhang Y, Cai Y, Xu M. The role of mitochondria in mTOR-regulated longevity. Biol Rev. 2015;90:167–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soto-Burgos J, Zhuang X, Jiang L, Bassham DC. Dynamics of autophagosome formation. Plant Physiol. 2018;176:219–29. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang MC, Bohmann D, Jasper H. JNK signaling confers tolerance to oxidative stress and extends lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2003;5:811–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00323-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu J, Li I, Jiang Y, Chen C. Toxicological evaluation of Lepista nuda (Bull. ex Fr) Cooke mycelium produced by an in vitro culture methodology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7:363–70.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramchiun S, Sikaphan S, Leudang S, Polputpisatkul D, Nantachaiphong N, Khaentaw T, Nooron N, Uttawichai C, Parnmen S. Molecular characterization and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring-based detection in case of suspected phalloides syndrome poisoning. J Assoc Med Sci. 2018;52:48–55. https://doi.org/10.14456/jams.2019.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vetter J. Toxins of Amanita phalloides. Toxicon. 1998;36:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(97)00074-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell CL, Yeager RD, Johnson ZJ, D’Annunzio SE, Vogel KR, Werner T. Long-term resistance of Drosophila melanogaster to the mushroom toxin alpha-amanitin. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e127569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee SR, Yi SA, Nam KH, Ryoo R, Lee J, Kim KH. Pantheric acids A-C from a poisonous mushroom, Amanita pantherina, promote lipid accumulation in adipocytes. J Nat Prod. 2019;82:3489–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jia K, Chen D, Riddle DL. The TOR pathway interacts with the insulin signaling pathway to regulate C. elegans larval development, metabolism and life span. Development. 2004;131:3897–906. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Min K, Tatar M. Drosophila diet restriction in practice: do flies consume fewer nutrients? Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127:93–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2005.09.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L, Li YM, Lei L, Liu Y, Wang X, Ma KY, Chen Z. Cranberry anthocyanin extract prolongs lifespan of fruit flies. Exp Gerontol. 2015;69:189–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yuan X, Zhu M, Tian G, Zhao Y, Zhao L, Ng TB, Wang H. Biochemical characteristics of a novel protease from the basidiomycete Amanita virgineoides. Biotechnol Appl Bioc. 2017;64:532–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Asano M, Yamada K, Tanaka T, Matsuo Y, Kouno I. New bisabolane sesquiterpene from the mycelia of Amanita virgineoides. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2013;61:366–9. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c12-01070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu LY, Liu JK, Su WH, Peng T. A novel chloro-substituted pentenamide from the fruiting bodies of Amanita virgineoides. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2018;20:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286020.2017.1367771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Phat C, Moon B, Lee C. Evaluation of umami taste in mushroom extracts by chemical analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue system. Food Chem. 2016;192:1068–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tuno N, Takahashi KH, Yamashita H, Osawa N, Tanaka C. Tolerance of Drosophila flies to ibotenic acid poisons in mushrooms. J Chem Ecol. 2007;33:311–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9228-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stump AD, Jablonski SE, Bouton L, Wilder JA. Distribution and mechanism of α-Amanitin tolerance in mycophagous Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ Entomol. 2011;40:1604–12. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Griffin LH, Reed LK. Effect of gut microbiota on α-amanitin tolerance in Drosophila tripunctata. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:9419–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mitchell CL, Saul MC, Lei L, Wei H, Werner T. The mechanisms underlying alpha-amanitin resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: a microarray analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mizushina Y, Takahashi N, Hanashima L, Koshino H, Esumi Y, Uzawa J, Sugawara F, Sakaguchi K. Lucidenic acid O and lactone, new terpene inhibitors of eukaryotic DNA polymerases from a basidiomycete, Ganoderma lucidum. Bioorgan Med Chem. 1999;7:2047–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0896(99)00121-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pohleven J, Brzin J, Vrabec L, Leonardi A, Čokl A, Štrukelj B, Kos J, Sabotič J. Basidiomycete Clitocybe nebularis is rich in lectins with insecticidal activities. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2011;91:1141–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3236-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang X, Lin M, Xu D, Lai D, Zhou L. Structural diversity and biological activities of fungal cyclic peptides, excluding cyclodipeptides. Molecules. 2017;22:2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kubo I, Kim M, Hood WF, Naoki H. Clitocine, a new insecticidal nucleoside from the mushroom Clitocybe inversa. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:4277–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)94251-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cowles RS, Rodriguez-Saona C, Holdcraft R, Loeb GM, Elsensohn JE, Hesler SP. Sucrose improves insecticide activity against Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Econ Entomol. 2015;108:640–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tou100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The writers would love to gratitude Henan Innovation Strategic Alliance of Edible-Medicinal Fungi Industrial Technology and Xinyang Aojite Edible Fungus Development Co., Ltd for technical guidance.

Funding

This work was supported by Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (202102110176); Henan Province Young Backbone Teacher Training Program (2019GGJS263); Doctoral Start-up Fund of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University; Innovative Research Team of Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Resources and Series Products Development of Ta-pieh Mountains in Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University (XNKJTD-009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH performed the lab experiments, project administration and writing—original draft. JL performed the field experiments, analyzed the all data (statistical analyses) in study. DW supervised the study and writing of the manuscript. NZ contributed in review and editing of the manuscript. XQ performed project administration, arranged funding sources. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinzhe Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors gave their consent for publication of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest among the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Li, J., Wang, D. et al. Effects of combinational mycelia obtained via in vitro culture on ageing and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster and their mechanisms. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00410-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00410-x

Keywords