Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Effects of boron toxicity on growth, oxidative damage, antioxidant enzymes and essential oil fingerprinting in Mentha arvensis and Cymbopogon flexuosus

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 7, Article number: 8 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient and necessary to plants for their proper growth. The concentration of B in soil and plant is greatly critical for the growth and productivity. Even at the low amount available in soils, B can be extremely toxic to plants especially in semi-arid and arid environments. In the present study, the effects of high B concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg) were elucidated on two important essential oil-bearing plants; Mentha arvensis and Cymbopogon flexuosus which are aromatic and antimicrobial herbs having well-known medicinal values.

Results

Application of different concentrations of B showed growth inhibitory effects on plant as evident by shoot and root lengths, fresh and dry weights of shoot in the studied plants. Treatments of B also reduced the total chlorophyll and carotenoid content, chlorophyll fluorescence and reduced the activities of carbonic anhydrase and nitrate reductase enzymes. Moreover, B stress considerably increased the proline content and lipid peroxide content as compared to control. The activities of antioxidant enzymes like catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were also significantly increased under B stress. The content of essential oil of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus increased at 2.5 mg/kg of B and decreased with further increase in concentrations of B.

Conclusion

The findings of present work suggest that increasing concentrations of B inhibited growth and photosynthetic pigments, increased oxidative damage and activities of antioxidant enzymes; however, a mild stress of B increased essential oil production in M. arvensis and C. flexuosus plants.

Background

Boron (B) is an important micronutrient and plays a crucial role in the growth and development of plants [1]. Boron plays significant role in several processes that are necessary for the growth of higher plants such as cell wall synthesis, lignification process, auxin metabolism, sugar and carbohydrate metabolism, photosynthesis, nucleic acid metabolism and several enzyme activities [2, 3]. Depending on the type of soil, amount of organic manure and precipitation, B concentration varies ranging from 10 to 300 kg−1 [4]. Application of B-rich fertilizers can overcome the deficiency of B, but to alleviate morbidity is a major issue [5]. High B levels in the soil, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions inhibit plant growth and decrease crop yield and quality [6]. B toxicity causes chlorosis and necrosis in the marginal regions of mature leaves [7], structural damage to thylakoids thus inhibits photosynthesis and limits CO2 uptake [8]. Mechanisms of B toxicity found in literature are: (1) changes in the cell wall structure, (2) alteration in the function of energy molecules, such as ATP, and (3) binding to RNA in order to interrupt the mechanism of cell division and expansion [9, 10]. Also, B toxicity disturbs electron transport, provides molecular oxygen as an alternative source for non-utilized electrons and light energy, leading to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide (O2−), hydroxyl (OH−) radicals, that causes membrane damage, that eventually leads to the cell death [11, 12]. An increase in concentration of ROS under high B concentration was found in tomato [13] and Artemisia annua [14,15,16]. Increase in the concentration of ROS in response to B toxicity, has been reported in many crops such as apple root stock [17], tomato [18], wheat [19], and barley [20]. Moreover, accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and an increase in lipid peroxidation in the cells and tissues caused by B toxicity has been reported in many plants [17,18,19, 21]. Ochiai et al. [22] compared B tolerance and intolerance in barley cultivars, and concluded that metabolite was insufficient to explain the tolerance mechanism in tolerant cultivar. Moreover, it was found that roots actively participate in the efflux of B, and accumulate low B in both root and shoots, which can be the reason of tolerance in barley [22]. However, our knowledge of B toxicity effects on essential oil-bearing plants is very limited.

Mentha arvensis L. (Lamiaceae), usually known as corn mint, field mint, wild mint or menthol mint and Cymbopogon flexuosus (Steud.) Wats., commonly known as lemongrass, are two major essential oil-bearing plants mainly cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions. In the foreseeable future, the global market of essential oils is expected to increase enormously, due to wide spectrum of the uses of these essential oil compounds, results in the growing number and preferences of consumers [23]. Among all the species of genus Mentha, essential oil of M. arvensis has the maximum share in global mint market, due to highest content of menthol (by product), used in pharmaceutical, cosmetics, perfumery and food industry [24]. The main constituent of C. flexuosus essential oil is citral, which provides lemon or rose-like smell to the plant, used in flavor, cosmetics, perfumery and pharmaceuticals industries [25]. Under B deficit conditions, growth of M. arvensis was severely affected [26], grain set failure [27] and reduced reproductivity was noted in wheat [28]. Micronutrients generally found to play significant role in growth, yield and oil content of essential oil-bearing plants and can affect oil quality and quality as they are involved in photosynthesis and utilize photosynthates, which are possibly involved in storage, synthesis and catabolism of monoterpenes [26]. Scarcity of boron, copper, manganese and molybdenum had positive effects on menthol content while menthone content showed negative effects in M. arvensis [26]. Pande et al. [29] narrated positive effects of iron on growth, chlorophyll content and oil yield in menthol mint. Differential effects of magnesium, manganese, iron, zinc and boron on growth and oil content was observed in Cymbopogon martini [30]. In three species of Cymbopogon, viz. C. flexuosus, C. martini and C. winterianus, cramped supplementation of manganese, iron, molybdenum, copper and zinc showed stimulated growth and oil yield in lemongrass [31]. Essential oil of both the plants have immense pharmaceutical value and the main objective of the current study is to document the morphological and biochemical changes including essential oil, in the plants under various concentrations of B, as no such studies have been performed earlier.

Materials and methods

Plant material and stress treatment

Mentha arvensis plants have been initiated from rhizome segments while C. flexuosus plants were commenced from slips of the plants obtained from CIMAP, Lucknow. The plants were grown in a naturally illuminated greenhouse using pots with a diameter of 25 cm, containing 5.0 kg consistent mixture of farmyard manure and soil (1:4). Physiochemical characteristics of soil; texture: sandy loam, pH: 8.0, EC (1:2): 0.48 m mhos/cm, available N, P and K: 97.46, 10.21 and 147.0 mg/kg soil, respectively.

Available B in the experimental soil was 0.5 mM, which is considered as safe limit for the agricultural crops. Boron was applied to the soil at the concentration of 0 (control) 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg soil, in the form of boric acid (H3BO3), 1 month after transplantation. Every treatment was replicated five times having five plants in each replicate. The experiment was conducted following simple randomized block design, and the plants were sampled 45 days after treatment for the different parameters.

Measurement of the growth characteristics

Plants were uprooted from the pots, washed to remove soil and all adhered foreign particles. Then, the plants were surface dried using blotting paper and then root and shoot height was recorded. Roots of the plants were removed carefully and the fresh weight of the shoot was recorded using an electronic balance. Dry weight of the plants was recorded after the samples were dried in hot air oven for 48 h at 80 °C.

Estimation of boron in plant tissues

B contents in the roots and leaves were determined by azomethine-H method [32]. The plant samples were reduced to dry ash in a muffle furnace at 500 °C for 6 h, and the carbon-free residue was then dissolved in 0.1 M HCl. Root and leaf B contents were determined in terms of milligrams per kilogram.

Determination of photosynthetic parameters

Total chlorophyll and carotenoid content were measured in the fully expanded young leaves by the method of [33]. Briefly, leaf tissue was ground in 80% acetone and then the absorbance of the extracted pigments was recorded at 662 nm and 645 nm for chlorophyll and at 480 nm for carotenoid content using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV 1700, Tokyo, Japan). The photosynthetic pigments measured thus were expressed as mg g−1 FW.

Chlorophyll fluorescence (FV/FM) was measured in diurnal time using a saturation pulse fluorometer PAM-2000 (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). All measurements were carried out on the unifoliolate fully expanded leaves. The upper surface of the leaves was clipped to measure chlorophyll fluorescence.

Estimation of activities of carbonic anhydrase and nitrate reductase

The activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) was measured by the method of Dwivedi and Randhawa [34] while the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) was measured by the method developed by Jaworski [35] as described in our previous paper [14].

Determination of proline

The proline content was estimated using the method of Bates et al. [36]. The leaf material was homogenized in 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid and the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000×g rpm. The supernatant was used to estimate the proline content. The reaction mixture, consisting of 2 mL of acid ninhydrin and 2 mL of glacial acetic acid, was boiled at 100 °C for 1 h. After terminating the reaction in an ice bath, the proline was extracted with 4 mL of toluene and its absorbance was recorded at 520 nm.

Estimation of lipid peroxidation rate (TBARS content)

Lipid peroxidation in leaves was determined by the content of total 2 thiobarbituric acid reactive substances as described by the method of Cakmak and Horst [37]. TBARS were extracted from 500 mg freshly chopped leaves, ground with 5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The mixture is then centrifuged at 12,000×g for 5 min, an aliquot of 1 mL of the supernatant was added to 4 mL of 0.5% (w/v) TBA in 20% (w/v) TCA. Samples were incubated at 90 °C for 30 min. Thereafter, the reaction was stopped using an ice bath. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 5 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was recorded at 532 nm with the help of a spectrophotometer and the values were corrected for non-specific turbidity by subtracting the absorbance at 600 nm. TBARS content was expressed as nanomoles per gram FW.

Antioxidant enzymes assay

Fresh leaf tissue was homogenized with an extraction buffer containing 0.5% (v/v), Triton-X-100 and 1% (w/v) polyvinyl pyrrolidone in potassium-phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.8) using chilled mortar and pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000×g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant obtained after centrifugation was used for the assay of catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase.

Catalase (CAT) activity was measured according to the method given by Chandlee and Scandalios [38] with a minor modification. The enzyme activity was expressed in units per milligram protein (U = 1 mM H2O2 reduced per minute per milligram protein).

Peroxidase activity (POX) was assayed by the method of Kumar and Khan [39]. The activity was expressed in units per milligram protein. One unit of the enzyme activity corresponded to an amount of the enzyme that caused an increased in the absorbance by 0.1 min−1 mg−1 protein.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was assayed by the method of Beauchamp and Fridovich [40]. One unit is defined as the amount of change in the absorbance by 0.1 h−1 mg−1 protein.

Determination of essential oil (EO) attributes

The content and quality attributes were determined in terms of content of EO per treatment and menthol and methyl acetate content in M. arvensis and citral and geraniol content in C. flexuosus.

The EO was extracted through hydro-distillation method using Clevenger’s apparatus (Borosil, India) and then quantified gravimetrically. The fresh leaves (200 g) were chopped into small pieces. Essential oil was extracted by distillation of leaves for 4 h. The extracted oil was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and subsequently preserved in sealed glass vials at 4 °C for gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of the EO. The amount of essential oil obtained from the plant material (leaves) was calculated as:

$$\begin{aligned}& {\text{EO content }}\left( {\% {\text{v}}/{\text{w}}} \right)\\&\quad = \left[ {{\text{Observed volume of oil }}\left( {{\text{mL}}} \right)/}\right.\\&\qquad\left.{{\text{Weight of sample }}\left( {\text{g}} \right) \times {1}00} \right]. \end{aligned}$$

GC–MS analysis

Essential oil active-constituents were determined using GC–MS at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi (India). For GC–MS an TG-WAX MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm, i.e., film thickness 0.25 µm) was used in a Perkin Elmer Clarus® 680 GC interfaced with a Clarus® SQ 8 C Quadrupole mass spectrometer. Programmed split/splitness (PSS) injector temperature was 250 °C with a split ratio of 1:40. Column oven was programmed from 40 to 120 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min and hold of 9, then at 120 °C to 140 °C at the rate of 2 °C/min and hold on 2 min and finally at 140 °C to 250 °C at the rate of 5 °C/min and hold of 2 min. Helium was used as carrier at constant flow of 1 mL/min. Source temperature was 220 °C; ionization energy 70 eV; and mass scan range 40–450 amu. Characterization was achieved on the basis of retention time, elution order, TurboMass NIST 2011 libraries version 2.3.0, Wiley registry of mass spectral data 9th edition.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ±  standard error of mean. One-way ANOVA was used to test differences among the treatments. Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT ≤ 0.05%) was also used to identify different treatment followed by ANOVA. Statistical significance level was considered as 5% and SPSS (ver: 22) statistical program was used for all statistical computations.

Results

To evaluate the effect of different concentrations of B on the growth, physiological, biochemical and essential oil parameters of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus were studied. In all tested concentrations of B, growth was maximally inhibited at 30 mg/kg B and minimally at 2.5 mg/kg B in both the plants as compared to control (Table 1). At 30 mg/kg B, shoot length was decreased by 46.9% in M. arvensis and 84.5% in C. flexuosus, root length was decreased by 59.8% and 82.5% in M. arvensis and C. flexuosus, respectively, as compared to control (Table 1). The inhibition of shoot fresh weight by 67.3% in M. arvensis and 50.7% in C. flexuosus was noticed while shoot dry weight was significantly decreased by 71.6% and 56.8% in case of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus, respectively, as compared to control (Table 1). B concentration in plant tissues increased with increasing B concentration in the soil in concentration-dependent manner, with B concentration of root being higher compared to that of leaf (Table 1). B accumulation was found to be more in M. arvensis compared to C. flexuosus. The photosynthetic pigments were decreased as the applied B concentration was increased. Maximum reduction of these pigments was noted when 30 mg/kg B was supplied to plants, while application of 2.5 mg/kg B showed minimum inhibition (Table 2). The total chlorophyll content decreased significantly by 36.9% in M. arvensis and 33.4% in C. flexuosus and total carotenoid content inhibited by 22.4% in M. arvensis and 23.9% in C. flexuosus in leaves of the plants as compared to control at 30 mg/kg B application (Table 2). Further, treatment of 30 mg/kg B maximally decreased chlorophyll fluorescence by 16.7% in M. arvensis and 16.5% in C. flexuosus (Table 2).

Table 1 Effect of different concentrations of B on growth attributes and B content of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus
Full size table
Table 2 Effect of different concentrations of boron on photosynthetic and biochemical attributes of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus
Full size table

Activities of assimilation of key enzymes (NR and CA) were also decreased with the increase in concentration of B. Maximum reduction in the activity of these enzymes was observed when 30 mg/kg B was applied (Table 2). NR activity was inhibited by 41.7% in M. arvensis and 32.5% in C. flexuosus at 30 mg/kg B, while the activity of CA showed similar response and decreased by 41.3% in M. arvensis and 43.9% in C. flexuosus at 30 mg/kg B (Table 2).

Lipid peroxidation rate after application of different concentrations of B was enhanced rapidly and maximum values were noted at 30 mg/kg B as compared to control in case of both crops. The most toxic effects were observed at 30 mg/kg B, showing the highest membrane damage (Table 3). Proline content in leaves was significantly increased at all the concentrations of B as compared to control, however, the highest values were observed at 30 mg/kg B (Table 3). High concentrations of B increased the activity of CAT, POX, and SOD as compared with the control in both plants. Activities of CAT and POX were maximally increased when 30 mg/kg B was applied to M. arvensis and C. flexuosus plants. Also, the activity of SOD almost doubled as compared to control in M. arvensis and C. flexuosus at 30 mg/kg B (Table 3).

Table 3 Effect of different concentrations of boron on proline, TBARS and antioxidant enzymes of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus
Full size table

Interestingly, EO content was significantly increased at 2.5 mg/kg B in M. arvensis and C. flexuosus plants. However, further increase in the applied B concentrations decreased the EO content in both the plants (Fig. 1). GC–MS data revealed the percentage of components present in essential oil of studied plants. In case of M. arvensis, menthol and menthyl acetate content was significantly increased at 2.5 mg/kg B as compared to control (Figs. 2, 3). The content of citral and geraniol was increased at 2.5 mg/kg B in C. flexuosus as compared to the control. Surprisingly, a significant increase in geraniol content was also noticed at 5 mg/kg B in C. flexuosus (Figs. 2, 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of different concentrations of B on essential oil content of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus. The different lower case letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of different concentrations of B on essential oil components of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus. The different lower case letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

GC–MS chromatograms of the essential oil of a control b 2.5 mg/kg B-treated M. arvensis and c control d 2.5 mg/kg B-treated C. flexuosus plants

Full size image

Discussion

Boron is involved in many physiological and biochemical processes during plant growth, but the exposure of plants to high levels of B results in a reduction in growth parameters. Boron nutrition requirement varies considerably among different crops. M. arvensis and C. flexuosus grown under high concentrations of B exhibited remarkable decrease in growth parameters. The shoot and root lengths of both the plants were reduced as the concentration of applied B was increased. Inhibition of root and shoot growth was reported earlier under excess B concentrations in grapevine [19], barley [41], tomato [18], Artemisia [16] and in wheat [42] as B stress causes antimitotic and mito-depressive effect that eventually leads to the decrease in cell division. Various processes of dissimilar susceptibility lead to the response of high B and intercellular B concentration is found to be associated with B toxicity [43]. In Arabidopsis, findings on molecular basis of reduction in root growth under B stress revealed that expression of genes involved in cell wall modification, ABA response and ABA signaling was enhanced under high B concentration while the expression of genes involved in water transporters was repressed, suggesting that inhibition of root growth under B stress is associated with water stress response [28]. High B concentration significantly decreased fresh and dry weights of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus and similar results were found in case of agricultural crops such as wheat, tomato, and pepper [44,45,46]. Reduction in photosynthetic enzymes activities under high B concentration alter the electron transport system, that ultimately results in low CO2 assimilation and a direct correlation has been found in reduced shoot biomass and decreased photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and decline of sucrose paralleled by increments of glucose and fructose concentration in leaves [47, 48]. Roots play numerous roles during plant growth and development and are typically the first part of the plant to encounter several types of environmental stresses [49]. Results of present study revealed that there was a higher accumulation of B in roots compared to that in leaves with increasing B concentrations (Table 1). In this context, our results corroborate the findings of Kaya et al. [50], who reported comparatively a higher accumulation of B in roots of tomato than in other plant parts. In fact, the ability of the plants to tolerate high B could be due to the capacity of the plants to accumulate more B in roots and a lesser amount of the B being transported to shoots. However, B uptake responses of the crops might differ significantly with regard to the susceptibility of crops to various stresses.

In the present study, chlorophyll fluorescence ‘FV/FM’ (maximum quantum yield of photosystem II) was measured to check the effect of high concentration of B on PS II. The high doses of B decreased the quantum yield dramatically in both the plants showing severe damage to PS II. Decrease in FV/FM has earlier been reported in the leaves of Navelina orange plants under high B concentration and same results were found in apple rootstocks [51, 52]. M. arvensis and C. flexuosus leaves showed chlorotic patches on the margins of leaves and necrosis on the leaf tip under excess B, might be the reason of low chlorophyll and carotenoid concentration in both plants. It was reported that ribose moieties of ATP, NADH, or NADPH, usually binds to B under high internal B concentration, causing disruption in metabolism and inhibits normal activities of biosynthetic pathways [53]. Stress conditions usually affect the chlorophyll and carotenoid content in leaves [54]. Reduction in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents was found in Arabidopsis [47], wheat [1, 42], and pepper [53] under excess B. Moreover, reduced FV/FM in leaves under excess B was reported in many species, showed photoinhibition that ultimately leads to the formation of ROS [55]. A significant decrease was observed in the activities of NR and CA in both plants under excess B. Formation of borate ester with ribose by the inhibition of protein synthesis under B toxicity is found to disrupt the normal function of several enzymes, thus the plant metabolism [56]. Excess B affected the NR activity in wheat, barley and tomato [18, 20, 21, 44]. Cervilla et al. [18] reported that excess B enhanced the activity of glutamine synthase and glutamine synthetase while lowering the activity of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase that eventually caused assimilation of ammonium in tomato leaves.

Proline content increased with the increasing concentrations of B in both the plants. Proline plays a crucial role in osmoregulation, protecting enzyme from denaturation and scavenges ROS as hydroxyl radical scavenger. Accumulation of proline in leaves under excess B is directly correlated with stress tolerance in plants [1]. High proline content under excess B was noticed in several crops [57]. TBARS content of both the plants was measured to determine lipid peroxidation under B stress. Boron toxicity increased MDA content in a dose-dependent manner. Similar results were found in many crops [13, 19]. It is well documented that high level of H2O2 in plant cells causes the formation of oxidative stress [58]. Moreover, excess H2O2 can damage membrane integrity resulting in the formation of hydroxyl radical that causes lipid peroxidation [14]. It is found that singlet oxygen, product of triplet state chlorophyll highly damages the cellular components and increases lipid peroxidation that further initiates the production of highly reactive radicals and lipid hydroperoxides, known to be the indicator of stress conditions [59].

The activity of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POX and SOD were measured in shoots of both plants as these are the lipid peroxidation scavenging enzymes. Increased activities of antioxidant were observed in plants to combat and minimize the toxic effects of ROS such as, superoxide radicals, hydroxyl alkoxy radicals and singlet oxygen [47]. In the present study, B toxicity increased antioxidant enzyme activities 2–3 folds with increasing B concentrations. Previous researches support our results as antioxidant enzyme activities increased under B toxicity [11, 13]. Excess of B causes inhibition of α tocopherol synthesis, main component of antioxidant defense mechanism that results in the membrane damage by free radicals [60]. SOD plays crucial role in plant stress tolerance mechanism and increased level of SOD under stress conditions is an indication of oxidative stress tolerance, as it breaks O2− into H2O2 in various compartments of plant cells [11, 61]. Excess B increased SOD activities in the leaves of various plants [14, 62]. High B concentration in leaves affects CAT activity differently depending on the plant species and CAT scavenges H2O2 produced in peroxisome by breaking it into water and oxygen through glycolate cycle and β-oxidation of fatty acids, showing protective role under stress conditions [11, 63].

Interestingly, the content of EO and its active constituents (menthol and menthyl acetate in case of M. arvensis and citral and geraniol in case of C. flexuous) were enhanced under the boron treatment at 2.5 mg/kg (Figs. 2, 3). The impact of B stress on both crops has not earlier been studied. It is worth emphasizing that the content of essential oil was more responsive to low concentration of B than the vegetative growth, which is especially crucial and is the main objective for cosmetic and pharmacy industry. In fact, it has been reported that if the concentration of B is relatively low in plants, it plays a prominent role in metabolic processes [64, 65]. It was reported by various researchers that B changes the EO content as well as metabolite profiles in crops [66, 67]. Primary and secondary metabolisms in essential oil-bearing plants such as mints and citronella are dependent on nutritional status of plants [68]. The present results exhibited differences in the content of EO of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus, which is in conformity with the results reported by Sugier et al. [69]. However, there are a few studies in context of ecological effects of abiotic stress on secondary metabolites rather than genetically influenced [70].

Conclusions

All the concentrations of applied B, reduced the growth of M. arvensis and C. flexuosus, however, the highest concentration, i.e., 30 mg/kg B was found to be most deleterious and maximally decreased the growth attributes. TBARS content and activities of antioxidant enzymes were increased under B stress, as these parameters are indicative of oxidative stress. Interestingly, oil content was significantly increased in both the plants under mild B stress (2.5 mg/kg B). An increase in menthol and menthyl acetate content was noticed at 2.5 mg/kg B in M. arvensis and in the content of citral and geraniol in C. flexuosus as compared to the control.

Availability of data and materials

Additional data may be availed on request to the authors through the corresponding author. We take legal responsibility for information, used procedures, data and results.

Abbreviations

B:

boron

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

CIMAP:

Central Institute for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

EC:

electrical conductivity

CA:

carbonic anhydrase

NR:

nitrate reductase

TBARS:

thiobarbituric acid reactive substance

CAT:

catalase

POX:

peroxidase

SOD:

superoxide dismutase

EO:

essential oil

GC–MS:

gas chromatography–mass spectrophotometer

PS II:

photo system II

References

  1. Kahiyan SD, Kahiyan C, Ciftci OY. Excess boron responsive regulations of antioxidative mechanism at physio- biochemical and molecular levels in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;109:337–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Princi M, Lupini A, Araniti F, Longo C, Mauceri A, Sunseri F, Abenavoli RM. Boron toxicity and tolerance in plants: recent advances and future perspective. In: Plant metal interaction. 2016. p. 115–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Wimmer MA, Abreu I, Bell RW, Bienert MD, Brown PH, Dell B, Fujiwara T, Goldbach HE, Lehto T, Mock H, von Wirén N, Bassil E, Bienert GP. Boron: an essential element for vascular plants. New Phytol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16127s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozturk M, Sakcali S, Gucel S, Tombuloglu H. Boron and plants. In: Plant adaptation and phytoremediation. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 275–311.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Reid JR, Hayes EJ, Post A, Stangoulis RCJ, Graham DR. A critical analysis of the causes of boron toxicity in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;25:1405–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nable RO, Banuelos GS, Paull JG. Boron toxicity. Plant Soil. 1997;193:181–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka M, Fujiwara T. Physiological roles and transport mechanism of boron: perspectives from plants. Pflugers Arch-Eur J Physiol. 2007;456:671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Landi M, Remorini D, Pardossi A, Guidi L. Boron excess affects photosynthesis and antioxidant apparatus of greenhouse Cucurbita pepo and Cucumis sativus. J Plant Res. 2013;126:775–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stangoulis J, Reid JR. Boron toxicity in plants and animals. In: Boron in plant and animal nutrition. 2002. p. 227–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Camacho-Cristobal JJ, Rexach J, Gonzalez-Fontes A. Boron in plants: deficiency and toxicity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50:1247–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ardic M, Sekmen HA, Tokur S, Ozdemir F, Turkan I. Antioxidant responses of chickpea plants subjected to boron toxicity. Plant Biol. 2009;11:328–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landi M, Margaritopoulou T, Papadakis IE, Araniti F. Boron toxicity in higher plants: an update. Planta. 2019;1–22.

  13. Cervilla ML, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Rosales AM, Rodriguez SE, Wilhelmi RMM, Romero L, Ruiz MJ. Parameters symptomatic for boron toxicity in leaves of tomato plants. J Bot. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/726206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aftab T, Khan MMA, Idrees M, Naeem M, Ram M. Boron induced oxidative stress, antioxidant defence, response and changes in artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L. J Agron Crop Sci. 2010;196:423–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aftab T, Khan MMA, Idrees M, Naeem M, Moinuddin, Hashmi N. Methyl jasmonate counteracts boron toxicity by preventing oxidative stress and regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Protoplasma. 2011;248:601–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aftab T, Khan MMA, Naeem M, Idrees M, Moinuddin, Teixeira da Silva JA, Ram M. Exogenous nitric oxide donor protects Artemisia annua from oxidative stress generated by boron and aluminium toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe. 2012;80:60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Molassiotis A, Sotiropoulos T, Tanou G, Diamantidis G, Therios I. Boron induced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environ Exp Bot. 2006;56:54–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Romero L, Ruiz JM. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants subjected to boron toxicity. Ann Bot. 2007;100:747–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunes A, Soylemezoglu G, Inal A, Bagci EG, Coban S, Sahin O. Antioxidant and stomatal responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to boron toxicity. Sci Hortic. 2006;110:279–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Inal A, Pilbeam DJ, Gunes A. Silicon increases tolerance to boron toxicity and reduces oxidative damage in barley. J Plant Nutr. 2009;32:112–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karabal E, Yücel M, Ökte HA. Antioxidants responses of tolerant and sensitive barley cultivars to boron toxicity. Plant Sci. 2003;164:925–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ochiai K, Uemera S, Shimizu A, Okumoto Y, Matoh T. Boron toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). I. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of tolerance to boron toxicity. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;11:125–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sangwan NS, Farooqi AHA, Shabih F, Sangwan RS. Regulation of essential oil production in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2001;34:03–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lohani H, Andola CH, Gwari G, Bhandari U, Chauhan N. Comparative aroma profile M. arvensis L. corn mint from Uttarakhand Himalaya. J Pharm Res. 2012;5:5436–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ganjewala D. Cymbopogon essential oils: chemical composition and bioactivities. Int J Essent Oil Ther. 2009;3:56–655.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Farooqui A, Mishra A. Effect of micronutrient on oil content and plant growth in M. arvensis L. var Piperascens mal. Indian J Plant Physiol. 1983;24:230–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rerkasem B, Netsangtip R, Lordkaew S, Cheng C. Grain set failure in boron deficient wheat. Plant Soil. 1993;155:309–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang L, Pant J, Dell B, Bell WB. Effects of boron deficiency on anther development and floret fertility in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ‘Wilgoyne’. Ann Bot. 2000;85:493–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pande P, Anwar M, Chand S, Yadav KV, Patra DD. Optimal level of iron and zinc in relation to its influence on herb yield and production of essential oil in menthol mint. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2007;38:561–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rao RRB, Rajput KD. Response of palmarosa (Cymbopogon martini (Roxb.) Wats. var. motia. Burk.) to foliar application of magnesium and micronutrients. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;33:277–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh PR, Singh KR, Singh NS, Singh SR. Micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Mo) status of a sodic soil under cultivation of aromatic crops. In: International union of soil sciences. 2006. p. 159–23.

  32. Wolf B. The determination of B in soil extracts, plant materials, composts, manures, water and nutrient solutions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1971;2:363–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurements and characterization by UV–VIS spectroscopy. In: Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Agric Sci. 2001;5(12).

  34. Dwivedi RS, Randhawa NS. Evaluation of rapid test for hidden hunger of zinc in plants. Plant Soil. 1974;40:445–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaworski EG. Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;43:1274–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bates LS, Walden RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studied. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cakmak I, Horst J. Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiol Plant. 1991;83:463–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chandlee JM, Scandalios JG. Analysis of variants affecting the catalase development program in Maize scutellum. Theor Appl Genet. 1984;69:71–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar KB, Khan PA. Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi (Eleusine coracana cv. PR 202) leaves during senescence. Indian J Exp Bot. 1982;20:412–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beauchamp CO, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44:276–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Choi EY, Kolesik P, Mcneill A, Collins H, Zhang Q, Huynh BL, Graham R, Stangoulis J. The mechanism of Boron tolerance for maintenance of root growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:984–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Catav SS, Genc OT, Oktay KM, Kucukakyuz K. Effect of boron toxicity on oxidative stress and genotoxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018;100:502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ardic M, Sekmen HA, Turkan I, Tokur S, Ozdemir F. The effects of boron toxicity on root antioxidant system of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Plant Soil. 2008;314:99–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wimmer AM, Muhling HK, Lauchli A, Brown HP, Goldbach EH. The interaction between salinity and boron toxicity affects the subcellular distribution of ions and proteins in wheat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1267–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Eraslan F, Inal A, Gunes A, Alpaslan A. Boron toxicity alters nitrate reductase activity, proline accumulation, membrane permeability and mineral constituents of tomato and pepper plants. J Plant Nutr. 2007;30:981–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pandey N, Archana. Antioxidant responses and water status in Brassica seedlings subjected to boron stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35:697–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Surgun Y, Col B, Burun B. 24-Epibrassinolide ameliorates the effect of boron toxicity on Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh by activating an antioxidant system and decreasing boron accumulation. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38–71.

  48. Tsiantas PI, Papadakis IE, Tsaniklidis G, Landi M, Psychoyou M. Allocation pattern, nutrient partitioning, sugar metabolism and pigment composition in hydroponically grown Loquat seedlings subjected to increasing boron concentrations. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2019;19:556–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Parra-Lobato MC, Fernandez-Garcia N, Olmos E, Alvarez-Tinaut MC, Gómez-Jiménez MC. Methyl jasmonate-induced antioxidant defence in root apoplast from sunflower seedlings. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;66:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaya C, Tuna AL, Dikilitas M, Ashraf M, Koskeroglu S, Guneri M. Supplementary phosphorus can alleviate B toxicity in tomato. Sci Hortic. 2009;121:284–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Papadakis IE, Dimassi KN, Bosabalidis AM, Therios IN, Patakas A, Giannakoula A. Effects of B excess on some physiological and anatomical parameters of ‘Nevalina’ orange plants grafted on two rootstocks. Environ Exp Bot. 2004;51:247–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sotiropoulos TE, Molassiotis A, AlMaliotis D, Mouhtaridou G, Dimassi K, Therios I, Diamantidis G. Growth, nutritional status, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant response of the apple rootstock MM 111 shoot cultured under high boron concentrations in vitro. J Plant Nutr. 2006;29:575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sarafi E, Siomos A, Tsouvaltzis P, Therios I, Chatzissavvidis C. Boron toxicity effect on the concentration of pigments, carbohydrates and nutrient elements in six non-grafted pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian J Plant Physiol. 2018;23(3):474–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ahsan N, Lee DG, Lee SH, Kang KY, Bahk JD, Choi MS, Lee IJ, Renaut J, Lee BH. A comparative proteomic analysis of tomato leaves in response to waterlogging stress. Physiol Plant. 2007;131:555–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Oikonomou A, Ladikou EV, Chatziperou G, Margaritopoulou T, Landi M, Sotiropoulos T, Papadakis IE. Boron excess imbalances root/shoot allometry, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and sugar metabolism in apple plants. Agronomy. 2019;9:731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Siddiqui HS, Whaibi AHM, Sakran MA, Ali MH, Basalah OM, Faisal M, Alatar A, Amri AAA. Calcium induced amelioration of boron toxicity in radish. J Plant Growth Regul. 2013;32:61–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaya C, Ashraf M. Exogenous application of nitric oxide promotes growth and oxidative defense system in highly boron stressed tomato plant bearing fruit. Sci Hortic. 2015;185:43–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48:909–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Foyer HC, Descourvieres P, Kunert JK. Protection against oxygen radicals: an important defence mechanism studied in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;17:507–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cakmak I, Romheld V. Boron deficiency induced impairments of cellular functions in plants. Plant Soil. 1997;193:71–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Thounaojam CT, Panda P, Mazumdar P, Kumar D, Sharma DG, Sahoo L, Sanjib P. Excess copper induced oxidative stress and response of antioxidants in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;53:33–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tassi E, Giorgetti L, Morelli E, Videa PRJ, Torresdey IJD, Barbafinci M. Physiological and biochemical responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) exposed to nano-CeO2 and excess modulation of boron phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;110:50–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang BV, Kim HU, Lee SH, Kim YK, Deng PX, Kwak SS. Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47:570–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Loomis DW, Durst WR. Chemistry and biology of boron. BioFactors. 1992;3(4):229–329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Ann Bot. 1995;78.

  66. Asad A, Blamey CPF, Edwards GD. Effects of foliar applications on vegetative and reproductive growth on sunflower. Ann Bot. 2003;92:565–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Lu BY, Yang TL, Qi PY, Li Y. Identification of boron deficiency responsive microRNAs in Citrus sinensis roots by Illumina sequencing. Plant Biol. 2014;14:123.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Dixit D, Shivastava KN, Sharma S. Boron deficiency induced changes in translocation of 14 CO2-photosynthate into primary metabolites in relation to essential oil and curcumin accumulation in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Photosynthetica. 2002;40:109–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sugier D, Sugier P, Kowalski R, Kolodziej B, Olesinska K. Foliar boron fertilization as factor affecting the essential oil content and yield of oil components from flower heads of Arnica montana L. and Arnica chamissonis less cultivated for industry. Ind Crops Prod. 2010;109:587–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Ahl ASH, Mahmoud AA. Effect of zinc and/or iron foliar application on growth and essential oil of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under salt stress. Ozean J Appl Sci. 2010;3:1943–2429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ms. Sadaf Choudhary and Ms. Andleeb Zehra would like to thank University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India, for providing financial support in the form of Non-NET fellowship.

Funding

The authors have not received any funding or grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Physiology Section, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202 002, India

    Sadaf Choudhary, Andleeb Zehra, M. Naeem, M. Masroor A. Khan & Tariq Aftab

Authors
  1. Sadaf Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andleeb Zehra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Naeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Masroor A. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tariq Aftab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors of this research paper have directly participated in planning, execution and analysis of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Aftab.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research work meets all the ethical guidelines, adhering to the legal requirements of my country.

Consent for publication

The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest and agree with submission of the manuscript to your journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhary, S., Zehra, A., Naeem, M. et al. Effects of boron toxicity on growth, oxidative damage, antioxidant enzymes and essential oil fingerprinting in Mentha arvensis and Cymbopogon flexuosus. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 7, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0175-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0175-y

Keywords