Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Effects of continuous cropping of Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial communities and functional genes

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 8, Article number: 43 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. is a commonly used herb in traditional Chinese medicine, and the main raw material of various Chinese patent medicines. Continuous cropping obstacle (CCO) is the main factor leading to the decline of crop yields and quality.

Methods

Metagenomics sequencing technology was used to analyze the microbial community and functional genes of continuous cropping (CC) and control (CK) soils of P. ternata. In addition, differences in physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community composition and the abundance of functional genes in CC and CK were evaluated, as well as the relationship between these factors and CCO.

Results

Results indicated that CC of P. ternata led to the decline of rhizosphere soil pH, nutrient imbalance and enzyme activity reduction. Metagenomic analysis indicted that CC also changed the composition of the microbial community, causing an increase in the relative abundance of pathogenic microorganisms such as Fusarium, Klebsiella oxytoca and Pectobacterium carotovorum in the P. ternata rhizosphere. The relative abundance of potentially beneficial Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium was recorded to decrease. Results also showed that there were considerable differences in CC and CK about the abundances of functional genes related to soil enzymes and the degradation of P. ternata allelochemicals, as well as the microbial groups which they belong. These results clarified the effects of CC on the microbial community structure and functional genes of soil. In addition, Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium might play important roles in enhancing soil fertility and reducing the toxicity of phenolic acids in rhizosphere soil.

Conclusions

CC of P. ternata changed the physicochemical properties, microbial community and functional genes of rhizosphere soil. Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium for enhancing soil fertility and reducing the toxicity of phenolic acids might be potentially beneficial. These results provide theoretical guidance for bioremediation of CCO soil of P. ternata and other staple crops.

Graphic abstract

Background

Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. (genus: Pinellia; Family: Araceae) is a slightly poisonous and pungent perennial herb whose dry tuber is often used in medicine [1]. In addition, P. ternata is also one of the commonly used Chinese herbal medicines in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Its tuber has unique pharmacological characteristics, such as effects of drying dampness and expectoration, anti-obesity, antipyresis and hemostasis [2, 3]. The utilization frequency of P. ternata among 588 kinds of Chinese medicine prescriptions ranks the 22nd. The market demand and price for this herb is increasing [4]. Continuous cropping obstacles (CCO) indicates that when the same crop or closely related crops are continuously planted on the same land, crop diseases and pests are exacerbated and crop yield and quality decline, even under normal cultivation management measures. Since 70% of root-type Chinese medicinal materials have varying degrees of CCO [5], it poses a severe challenge to the cultivation of medicinal plants [6]. The CC of P. ternata will not only cause aggravation of pests and diseases, soil salinization and acidification, but also reduce the photosynthetic performance of leaves [7] and the activity of antioxidant enzymes of the plant, lead to membrane lipid peroxidation damage [8, 9], ultimately resulting in the yield and quality decline of P. ternata. Investigations have shown that changes in soil physicochemical properties, nutrient decline, soil microbial community structure imbalance, accumulation of soil-borne pathogens and phenolic acid allelochemicals can all result in CCO [10,11,12]. Even under normal management practices, the yield of P. ternata after 2–4 years of continuous cropping (CC) is generally reduced by 80–90% [13]. A common method to overcome CCO in P. ternata production is to incorporate crop rotation. However, long rotation periods and the reduction of cultivation area greatly reduce the utilization rate of P. ternata land resources, thereby seriously restricting the sustainable development of the P. ternata industry.

To date, the cause of CCO in P. ternata and mitigation measures are rarely reported. He et al. [10, 13] found that CC of P. ternata changed the physicochemical properties of the soil and the structure of the microbial community, causing serious degradation of soil fertility and a decrease in the diversity of the rhizosphere soil microbial community. However, the relationship between CCO of P. ternata and microbial functions is not clear. In addition, the interaction between microbial community and soil physicochemical properties needs to be further studied. Previous findings showed vanillin, vanillic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringaldehyde, syringic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, benzofuran, chlorogenic acid, etc., have significant inhibitory effects on the growth of P. ternata seedlings. Therefore, these compounds are considered as main allelochemicals autotoxins of P. ternata [9, 14]. In addition, these allelochemicals autotoxins are also the main substances that cause CCO in other staple crops, such as Arachis hypogaea [15, 16], Glycine max [17], and Radix pseudostellariae [18]. Plants can release allelochemicals into the environment through a variety of pathways, for instance volatilization, leaching, residue decomposition and root secretion [11]. However, studies on the biodegradation of these allelochemicals in CC soil of P. ternata and the selective shaping of the rhizosphere microflora of P. ternata as well as how to jointly affect the growth and development of P. ternata have not been reported yet. At present, the main measures to mitigate CCO of P ternata include rotation, intercropping and soil sterilization [10, 13, 19]. These measures, however, have disadvantages, including long rotation periods, low land resource utilization rates and high costs. Although bioremediation may provide new ways to solve CCO, it is still lacking on screening the microorganisms for beneficial to soil and allelochemicals degradation, constructing bioremediation microbial inoculants and studying the effect and mechanism of bioremediation CC soil of P. ternata. In addition, with the continuous development of omics technology, metagenomics technology has been widely used in functional genomic analysis of various environmental samples, such as soil samples [20, 21] and compost samples [22]. In this study, we took CC soil and unplanted soil (CK) of P. ternata as the research objects. Combining the physicochemical and metagenomic data, we analyzed the differences in physicochemical properties, enzyme activities and microbial community composition, as well as the abundances of functional genes related to soil enzyme and the degradation of the main allelochemicals of P. ternata. It is expected to expand our understanding on the relationship between these factors and P. ternata CCO, providing theoretical guidance to mitigate P. ternata CCO.

Materials and methods

Soil sampling

The sampling site, Zhongchengzhai Village, Yilong County, Sichuan Province (30°11′–31°39′ N, 106°14′–106°52′ E, China; 445 m.a.s.l), is located in the transitional zone between the northern Sichuan Basin and the hills in central Sichuan. The climate in this area is dominated by a temperate subtropical humid monsoon climate with an average annual temperature of 15.08 °C and a mean annual rainfall of 130.68 mm. The annual sunshine duration was 1000–1400 h. Two type of soil samples are continuous P. ternata cropping soil (CC) for 2 years and unplanted soil (CK), the CC sampling area is about 100 m away from that of CK. In addition, CC and CK had the same plantation history, and the previously planting crops including peanuts, rape and corn, before P. ternata was planted in CC soil. In the second year of continuous cropping, the yield of P. ternata was 50% lower than that of the first year, and serious diseases and pests occurred. The soil was sampled in the ‘five-point sampling’ trajectory on a sampling area of 20 m × 20 m. For each type of soil, five sampling sublocations (5 m × 5 m) were located at the four corners and the center of the sampling region. In each sublocation, the rhizosphere soil of 5 P. ternata plants (about 3 m apart from each other) was sampled using the method of Edwards [23]. The 3–5 mm soil around the P. ternata tubers (5–15 cm below the topsoil), together with the soil on the tubers, were collected as the rhizosphere soil.

The soil samples were collected using a shovel and placed in sterile plastic bags after removing the topsoil and were immediately placed on ice for transport to the laboratory within 5 h. Once the samples had reached the laboratory, the soils from the five sampling sublocations were mixed by method of coning and quartering as one type of soil sample. A portion of samples were stored at 4 °C for the determination of soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities. The remaining samples were stored at − 80 °C for high-throughput sequencing (HTS) analysis.

Physicochemical analysis

Soil pH of the water extract (soil sample:deionized water = 1:5, m/v) was determined using a pH meter (PB-10, Sartorius, Germany). P and K contents in soil samples were determined using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP Optima 8300, PerKinElmer, USA) [24]. Total N and organic matter were determined using an elemental analyzer (vario MACRO cube, Elementar, Germany) [25]. The enzyme activity of catalase (CAT) was measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometry [26], the enzyme activity of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was measured using pyrogallol colorimetry, the enzyme activity of sucrase (Suc) was measured using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetry and the enzyme activity of urease (Ure) was measured using indophenol blue colorimetry (Nanodrop 2000C, Thermo USA) [27]. Total phenolic acid (TPA) content was obtained using the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method (Nanodrop 2000C, Thermo USA) [28]. Each measurement was done in triplicates.

DNA extraction and HTS analysis

Total DNA from soil samples was extracted using an E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA Extraction Kit (D5625-02, Omega, USA). The extracted DNA was broken into short fragments using the Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) strategy. A library of inserted fragments with appropriate lengths was constructed. And then the paired-end (PE) sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq HTS platform. After sequencing, quality control on generated raw data was undertaken using FastQC (including GC content distribution, distribution of base quality and sequence average mass), and Cutadapt [29] was used to screen effective sequences. The MetaGeneMark was then used to predict functional genes [30]. The Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) algorithm [31] in MEGAN (MetaGenome Analyzer) [32] software was adopted to undertake annotation and abundance analysis for species.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis and plotting were performed using R [33]. The significant difference of soil nutrients and enzyme activities between the two groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test. And the correlation between enzyme activity and nutrients content was analyzed by SPSS25. The SciPy library of Python software [34] was used to obtain statistical analysis results of the differential abundance significance of species in CC and CK soils. The MetagenomeSeq package was used to analyze the significantly different species between the two samples. The hclust and ggtree in R were used to analyze the relationship between functional genes and microbial communities [35].

Sequence accession number

Sequence data have been deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information database and the accession numbers is PRJNA730399.

Results and discussion

Physicochemical properties and enzyme activities

Physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soil, as well as enzyme activities, in CC and CK soil (Table 1). Soil pH recorded a significant decline after CC of P. ternata and is consistent with the results of He et al. [10, 36]. This result is probably associated to a decrease in the ability of soil to absorb the exchanging cations after CC of P. ternata [37]. The microorganisms then gradually converted plant litter in the soil into organic acids, such as protocatechuic acid, resulting in soil acidification [36]. The acidified soil is more suitable for the development of fungal communities, which will promote the proliferation of soil-borne pathogens [38] and increase the incidence of soil-borne pathogens [39]. It is believed that the decline of soil nutrients is an important factor resulting in CCO [13]. But it is worth noting that in this study, the nutrient contents (expect total P), available N, available P, total K, and available K in CC were significantly higher than those in CK (Table 1). Similar phenomena that some nutrient elements are actually increased in CC soil have been found in R. pseudostellariae and Coptis chinensis [40, 41]. Although the reason for this change is unclear, it suggests that CCO may be caused by more than a loss of soil nutrients. Soil enzymes are involved in the cycle of soil elements and the development of soil fertility [12], which can be used as important indicators to evaluate soil quality and soil ecosystem stability [42, 43]. Ure, CAT, PPO and Suc activities of CK were significantly higher than those of CC (p < 0.01). This might be related to the increase of allelochemicals such as TPA caused by CC (Table 1), which could inhibit the enzyme activity of soil microorganisms [44]. Correlation coefficients between soil enzyme activities and nutrient contents (except total P) indicate that soil Ure, CAT, PPO and Suc were all negatively correlated with organic matter, total N, total K, available P and other nutrients (Table 2). Therefore, it is speculated that CC caused the decline of soil enzyme activities, and further lead to the different changes of the contents and proportions of various nutrients in the soil after CC, resulting a certain degree of soil nutrient imbalance [45]. This result also indicates that P. ternata CCO might be caused by the imbalance of soil nutrients. In addition, the reduction of soil enzyme activity might lead to the decline of soil quality and ecosystem stability [42], and increase the accumulation of toxic substances in the rhizosphere soil of P. ternata [40]. These changes will cause deterioration of the microenvironment of the rhizosphere soil of P. ternata, thus reducing crop yield and quality.

Table 1 Physicochemical properties and enzyme activities of CC and CK soils
Full size table
Table 2 Spearman correlation between enzyme activity and nutrients content
Full size table

In addition, compared with CK, the TPA content of CC soil increased by 47.2% (Table 1), indicating that CC of P. ternata resulted in an accumulation of phenolic acid allelochemicals in the rhizosphere environment. The accumulation of phenolic acid allelochemicals is also an important factor causing P. ternata CCO [46, 47]. Li et al. [48] believed that while allelochemicals released into the soil were decomposed and transformed by microorganisms, they could promote changes in rhizosphere microflora, thereby jointly affecting crop growth and development.

Composition of soil microbial community

HTS generated 55,258,098 and 45,942,465 clean reads from CC and CK samples, respectively. High-quality reads were clustered to 609,406 Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) from all samples using a sequence similarity > 97%, which could be divided into 64 phyla, 125 classes, 275 orders, 530 families and 1431 genera (remove unclassified and unidentified). Species composition and the relative abundance in CC and CK soils are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Species composition and the relative abundance in CC and CK soils at phylum level (a) and genus level (b). The phyla (genera) with relative abundance ranked after the top 20 and unidentified phyla (genera) were collectively referred to as others. CC continuous cropping, CK control check

Full size image

Species composition and the relative abundance in CC and CK soils at the phylum level (Fig. 1a) indicate that Proteobacteria was dominant in both CC and CK (average abundance was 69.6% ± 0.7%), followed by Actinobacteria (8.0% ± 0.7%). This result is consistent with the findings of He et al. [13]. Differential abundance analysis of microorganisms indicated that the abundance of Cyanobacteria in CC significantly increased, while that of Nitrospirae and Crenarchaeota markedly decreased. The species composition and the relative abundance distribution in CC and CK soils at the genus level are shown in Fig. 1b. The top 10 genera in relative abundance in CC samples were: Gemmatirosa (3.1%), Sphingomonas (2.9%), Bradyrhizobium (2.5%), Burkholderia (2.4%), Pseudomonas (1.9%), Ramlibacter (1.5%), Luteitalea (1.4%), Phenylobacterium (1.3%), Microcoleus (1.2%) and Variovorax (1.1%). In CK samples, the top 10 genera in relative abundances were Burkholderia (3.3%), Bradyrhizobium (2.2%), Gemmatirosa (2.1%), Luteitalea (2.1%), Pseudomonas (1.7%), Sphingomonas (1.4%), Streptomyces (1.3%), Variovorax (1.1%), Sorangium (1.1%) and Anaeromyxobacter (1.1%). Differential abundance analysis of species showed that the abundances of Microcoleus, Phenylobacterium and Sphingomonas in CC obviously increased, while that of Nitrospira notably decreased.

CC of P. ternata caused changes in the microbial community composition of rhizosphere soil. The relative abundance of Cyanobacteria in CC and CK soil was 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively. This phenomenon might be due to the continuous accumulation of pathogens (such as Fusarium) in the rhizosphere caused by CC, which inhibited the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the soil and promoted the continuous reproduction of Microcoleus and Streptophyta. This could lead to the occurrence of root rot and soft rot [13]. Research by Hu et al. [49] showed that Fusarium, Klebsiella oxytoca and Pectobacterium carotovorum were the main pathogens in CC soil of P. ternata. Results from our analysis also found that the abundance of Fusarium, K. oxytoca and P. carotovorum in CC were 1.56-fold, 2.17-fold, 2.36-fold higher than CK, respectively. Many studies have shown that the disorder of the microbial flora mediated by allelochemicals plays a key role in CCO [50], and phenolic acid allelochemicals can promote the formation and germination of Fusarium oxysporum spores [51]. The phenomenon that CCO leads to an increase of pathogenic bacteria has also been reported in the continuous cropping of R. pseudostellariae [52].

Previous investigations have recorded that Burkholderia have the ability of dissolving soil P [53] and N fixation [54], as well as phenolic acid allelochemicals degradation [55, 56]. The previous findings indicated that Burkholderia plays an important role in enhancing soil fertility and reducing the toxicity of phenolic acid allelochemicals, possibly is a kind of potentially beneficial soil bacteria for P. ternata cultivation. In our study, the abundance of Burkholderia was 3.3% in CK soil and 2.4% in CC soil, indicating that CC might inhibit some beneficial bacteria in P. ternata soil. Sphingomonas can use aromatic compounds as carbon and energy sources for growth and reproduction [57]. It has diverse degradation genes and highly active degrading enzymes, showing strong advantages in the degradation of aromatic compounds [58, 59]. In our study, the abundance of Sphingomonas in CC was 1.5% higher than that in CK, which was inferred to be related to the higher content of TPA in CC soil than that in CK (Table 1). These phenolic acid compounds might provide more carbon sources and energy sources for the growth and reproduction of Sphingomonas.

These results indicate that CC of P. ternata changed the composition of the microbial community in the rhizosphere soil, inhibited the growth of beneficial microorganisms, and promoted the growth and reproduction of soil-borne pathogens and other harmful microorganisms. These changes resulted in an unhealthy rhizosphere microbial community structure [9], leading to a decrease in yield and quality of P. ternata.

Analysis of functional genes and microorganisms to which they belong

The soil enzyme related

The abundance of functional genes related to soil enzyme and their microbial communities are shown in Fig. 2. Ure is a nickel-containing urea hydrolase that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to produce ammonia and carbon dioxide, which is beneficial to the absorption and utilization of plants. As Ure activity in CK was significantly higher than that in CC (Table 1), our results indicate that catabolism of urea in CK is greater than that in CC, consistent with lower N contents in the CK soil (Table 1). However, the abundances of functional genes related to Ure detected in CC, such as ureC (K01428), ureB (K01429), ureA (K01430) and ureAB (K14048), were all higher than those in CK (Fig. 2a). It can be seen from Fig. 2b that microorganism sources encoding these Ure related genes in CC and CK differed. Thermobacillus was a unique genus in CK, while the abundances of Nitrospira, Rhodoplanes, Streptomyces, Thaurea and Methylobacterium were higher in CK.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The abundance of functional genes related to soil enzyme and the microorganisms to which they belong; a gene abundance; b Ure; c CAT; d PPO; e Suc; in b–d, the size of the different colors in each cake represents the proportion of the microorganism abundance of that species in CC and CK

Full size image

CAT could decompose hydrogen peroxide into water and molecular oxygen to protect cells from damage [60]. In our study, CAT activity of CK was higher than that of CC. In CC soil, the decrease in CAT activity might increase the accumulation of toxic substances in the rhizosphere soil, thereby causing adverse changes in the rhizosphere microenvironment, and then affecting growth and development of P. ternata. The abundance of katE (K03781), a functional gene encoding CAT, was higher in CC than in CK (Fig. 2a). As shown in Fig. 2c, Brevundimonas was a unique genus in CC, and the abundances of Mesorhizobium, Roseomonas and Sorangium were higher in CK.

PPO participates in the conversion of aromatic compounds in soil organic components, oxidizing phenolic substances in the soil to quinones, and then condensing them into humic acid [61]. In this study, PPO activity of CK was significantly higher than that of CC, indicating that the conversion of aromatic compounds into other intermediate metabolites in CK was more efficient, which was consistent with the lower measured TPA content in CK (Table 1). However, the abundance of functional gene yfiH (K05810) encoding PPO in CC was higher than that in CK (Fig. 2a). Among them, Corynebacterium, Nitrospira and Rhodanobacter were unique genera in CK, and the abundances of Marichromatium and Pseudomonas were higher in CK (Fig. 2d).

Suc hydrolyzes high molecular weight sucrose molecules in the soil into glucose and fructose that can be absorbed and utilized by plants and microorganisms. Suc activity of CK in our study (Table 1) was significantly higher than that of CC, beneficial to the utilization of soil carbon sources. Detected functional genes encoding Suc included scaA (K01193), malL (K01182) and malZ (K01187), and the abundances of these functional genes in CC were all higher than those in CK (Fig. 2a). The abundances of Methylobacterium, Agromyces, Sorangium, Pseudomonas and Azoarcus which contained these genes were higher in CK than that in CC (Fig. 2e).

We analyzed the abundance of top 5 microbial communities containing the functional genes related to soil enzyme. The results indicate that microorganisms with these functional genes mainly including Burkholderia, Bradyrhizobium, Variovorax, Sphingomonas and Marichromatium (Fig. 3). Moreover, the composition of these microbial communities in CC and CK recorded noticeable differences, further indicating that CC of P. ternata changed the microbial community structure of the rhizosphere soil.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Microorganisms to which functional genes related to soil enzyme belong (top 5 in abundance): a Ure, b CAT, c PPO, and d Suc. The numbers in the boxes represent the relative abundances of genes

Full size image

Interestingly, the abundance of functional genes related to soil enzyme activity in CC was higher than that in CK (Fig. 2a), while measured activities of Ure, CAT, PPO and Suc in CK were all higher than those in CC (Table 1). It is speculated that the gene expression might be inhibited. RNA polymerase σH factor (encoding by Spo0H gene) is the main inhibitor of the expression of Ure [62], and the abundance of Spo0H in CC was 1.65-fold higher than CK. In addition, microorganisms producing Ure are reported mainly derived from, among others, Streptomyces and Methylobacterium [63, 64]. But their abundances reduced after CC of P. ternata (Fig. 2b). It is speculated that CC inhibited the expression of functional genes related to soil enzyme activity, reducing the abundance of enzyme producing microorganisms, thereby exhibiting lower enzyme activity in CC. More in-depth studies are needed about this phenomenon.

The allelochemical degradation related

Allelopathic autotoxicity means that plants release specific secondary metabolites into the environment, thereby causing harmful effects on the growth and development on themselves [65]. By summarizing the degradation pathways of the main allelochemicals of P. ternata (Fig. 4) [66,67,68,69,70], it could be seen that catechol and protocatechuic acid are two important intermediate metabolites.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Possible degradation pathways, important intermediate products, and key enzymes of the main allelochemicals of P. ternata

Full size image

Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase (C12O) is the key enzyme of the catechol ortho-cleavage pathway (Fig. 4), and the abundance of functional gene catA (K03381) encoding C12O was higher in CK than in CC (Fig. 5a), Cupriavidus was a unique genus in CC (Fig. 5b). Catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (C23O) was a key enzyme of the catechol meta-cleavage pathway. The abundances of genes encoding C23O in CC, dmpB (K00446) and catE (K07104), were higher than those in CK (Fig. 5a). Regardless of CK or CC, the abundance of C23O encoding gene was significantly higher than that of C12O. Therefore, we speculate that catechol mainly degraded phenolic acid allelochemicals through the meta-cleavage pathway in both CC and CK. As shown in Fig. 5c, Pseudonocardia and Luteipulveratus were unique genera in CC and CK samples, respectively. Protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase (P34O) was the key enzyme to degrade protocatechuic acid, and the abundances of functional genes pcaG (K00448) and pcaH (K00449) encoding P34O in CC were higher than those in CK (Fig. 5a). Plantactinospora was a unique genus in CC (Fig. 5d). The abundance of these allelochemicals degradation genes in CC is higher than that in CK, which may be related to the substrate induction caused by the higher concentration of TPA in CC, but it still needs further study and verification.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Abundance of functional genes related to allelochemical degradation of P. ternata and the microorganisms to which they belong. a gene abundance; b C12O; c C23O; and d P34O

Full size image

We also analyzed the abundance of top 5 microbial communities containing the functional genes related to allelochemical degradation. The results indicate that microorganisms containing these functional genes were mainly Burkholderia, Bradyrhizobium, Azoarcus, Gemmatirosa, and Cupriavidus (Fig. 6). The abundances of the microorganisms to which each functional gene belonged significantly differed between CC and CK. Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium were mainly enriched in CK, among which Burkholderia was also the genus with the highest abundance in CK (Fig. 1). They could also serve as potentially beneficial bacteria in the soil to enhance soil fertility [53, 71] and reducing the toxicity of allelochemicals [53]. Therefore, results from our study also could provide certain guidance for the screening of microorganisms which being beneficial to soil and degrading allelochemicals of P. ternata, further laying a foundation for bioremediation of the CCO soil of P. ternata and other staple crops.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Microbial community to which functional genes related to allelochemical degradation belong (top 5 in abundance): a C12O; b C23O; and c P34O. The numbers in the boxes represent the relative abundances of genes

Full size image

Conclusions

Findings from our investigation indicate that CC of P. ternata changed the physicochemical properties, enzyme activities and the microbial community structure of rhizosphere soil. The decrease in soil enzyme activity caused by CC resulted in a soil nutrient imbalance. It also led to an increase in relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria in the P. ternata rhizosphere, and the decrease in the content of potentially beneficial bacteria. In addition, CC also caused adverse effects on functional genes related to soil enzyme and allelochemical degradation, as well as the microbial communities to which they belonged. Results also indicated that Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium might be potentially beneficial soil bacteria. Our findings increase our understanding of CCO of P. ternata, providing certain guidance to exploit resources such as soil beneficial bacteria and degrading bacteria of allelochemicals. These results provided a theoretical basis for the further development of microbial remediation for CCO soil of P. ternata and other staple crops. Further attention should be paid to the interactions between P. ternata plants and their secondary metabolites with soil and microbial communities.

Availability of data and materials

All the data are included in this manuscript.

References

  1. Chinese Pharmacopoeia committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen JH, Cui GY, Liu JY, Tan RX. Pinelloside, an antimicrobial cerebroside from Pinellia ternata. Phytochemistry. 2003;64(4):903–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YJ, Shin YO, Ha YW, Lee S, Oh JK, Kim YS. Anti-obesity effect of Pinellia ternata extract in Zucker rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(6):1278–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan P, Li WP, Xiong MX, Lu D, Ding ZS. Status quo and sustainable development strategy of Pinellia ternata industry in China. China Pharm. 2013;24(31):2881–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang ZY, Lin WX. Continuous cropping obstacle and allelopathic autotoxicity of medicinal plants. Chin J Eco-Agric. 2009;17(1):189–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin FJ, Qu XY, Zeng W, Shu S. Study on the autointoxication of aquatic extracts from different parts of Coptis chinensis. J Chin Med Mater. 2009;32(3):329–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ma XQ, Xu HL, He ZG, Liang ZS, Han RL, Chang JP, Cai XM, Wang J. Obstruction effect of continuous cropping on Pinellia temata (Thumb) Breit and its mitigation measures. Acta Agric Boreali-occidentalis Sin. 2017;26(1):48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An Y, Yang D, Li X, Jin XJ. Study on the effect and physiological mechanism of continuous cropping obstruction of Pinellia ternata. Acta Agric Boreali-occidentalis Sin. 2018;27(7):99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu JK, Yan ZQ, Li XZ, Jin H, Yang XY, Xie M, Su AX, Qin B. Characterization of allelochemicals from the rhizosphere soil of Pinellia ternate (Thnub.) and their inhibition activity on protective enzymes. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018;125:301–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He Z, Chen H, Liang L, Dong J, Liang Z, Zhao L. Alteration of crop rotation in continuous Pinellia ternate cropping soils profiled via fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019;68(6):522–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jilani G, Mahmood S, Chaudhry AN, Hassan I, Akram M. Allelochemicals: sources, toxicity and microbial transformation in soil—a review. Ann Microbiol. 2008;58(3):351–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Wei QP. Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of Apple Nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e111744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. He ZG, Mao RJ, Dong JE, Liang ZS, Zhang HH, Liu L. Remediation of deterioration in microbial structure in continuous Pinellia ternata cropping soil by crop rotation. Can J Microbiol. 2018;65(4):282–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. He ZG. Mechanism of continuous cropping obstacles and crop rotation restoration in Pinellia ternate [D]. YangLing; Northwest A&F University; 2019.

  15. Chen Y, Peng Y, Dai CC, Ju Q. Biodegradation of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid by Phomopsis liquidambari. Appl Soil Ecol. 2011;51(1):102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Kang L, Wang HW, Yang T, Dai CC. Liquid laccase production by Phomopsis liquidambari B3 accelerated phenolic acids degradation in long-term cropping soil of peanut. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci. 2014;64(8):683–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Qu XH, Wang JG. Effect of amendments with different phenolic acids on soil microbial biomass, activity, and community diversity. Appl Soil Ecol. 2008;39(2):172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu HM, Wu LK, Wang JY, Zhu Q, Lin S, Xu JH, Zheng CL, Chen J, Qin XJ, Fang CX, Zhang ZX, Azeem S, Lin WX. Mixed phenolic acids mediated proliferation of pathogens talaromyces helicus and kosakonia sacchari in continuously monocultured Radix pseudostellariae rhizosphere soil. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hang Y, Luo FL, Zhao Z, Tang CL, Lin J, Li QW, Deng C. Effect of Pinellia ternata with different intercropping crops on soil microorganism, nutrient and enzyme activity. J Chin Med Mater. 2018;41(7):1522–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li M, Rong LL, Zhou SF, Xiao XY, Wu LG, Fan YX, Lu CH, Zou XM. Dissipation of sulfonamides in soil emphasizing taxonomy and function of microbiomes by metagenomic analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(47):13594–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Babalola OO, Akinola SA, Ayangbenro AS. Shotgun metagenomic survey of Maize soil rhizobiome. Microbiol Resour Ann. 2020;9(39):e00860-e920.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang C, Dong D, Wang H, Muller K, Qin Y, Wang H, Wu W. Metagenomic analysis of microbial consortia enriched from compost: new insights into the role of actinobacteria in lignocellulose decomposition. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(22):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, Lurie E, Sundaresan V. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;112(8):E911–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao SQ, Liu G, Ou QH, Xu J, Ren J, Hao JM. Analysis of different types of soil by FTIR and ICP-MS. Spectrosc Spectr Anal. 2014;34(12):3401–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kowalenko CG. Assessment of LECO CNS-2000 analyzer for simultaneously measuring total carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 2001;32(13–14):2065–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buturug MD, Tefanic G, Sndoiu DI, Bdulescu L. Ecological methods of pedo-enzymatical analysis for soil fertility control. Roman Biotechnol Lett. 2016;21(3):11471–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang LF, Zeng Q, Li HB, Yan JJ. Measurement of catalase activity in soil by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Chin J Soil Sci. 2011;42(1):207–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fu L, Xu BT, Gan RY, Zhang Y, Xu XS, Xia EQ, Li HB. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of herbal and tea infusions. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(4):2112–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Embnet J. 2011;17(1):10–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu WH, Alexandre L, Mark B. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(12):e132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh HJ, Weber N, Schuster SC. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 2011;21(9):1552–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 2007;17(3):377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.

  34. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. 2014.

  35. Yu GC, Smith KD, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT-Y. ggtree: anrpackage for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arafat Y, Din UI, Tayyab M, Jiang YH, Chen T, Cai ZY, Zhao HY, Lin XM, Lin WX, Lin S. Soil sickness in aged tea plantation is associated with a shift in microbial communities as a result of plant polyphenol accumulation in the tea gardens. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou WX, He YS, Zhu YH, Zhang MD, Duan YY, Huang DY, Xu DB, Ai LQ. Improvement effects of quicklime and calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer on acidified soil cultivating Codonopsis tangshen. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2019;30(9):3224–32.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bååth E. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microb. 2009;75(6):1589–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim JM, Roh AS, Choi SC, Kim EJ, Choi MT, Ahn BK, Kim SK, Lee YH, Joa JH, Kang SS, Lee SA, Ahn JH, Song J, Weon HY. Soil pH and electrical conductivity are key edaphic factors shaping bacterial communities of greenhouse soils in Korea. J Microbiol. 2016;54(12):838–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Song XH, Pan Y, Li LY, Wu XL, Wang Y. Composition and diversity of rhizosphere fungal community in Coptis chinensis Franch. continuous cropping fields. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0193811.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu LK, Chen J, Wu HM, Wang JY, Wu YH, Lin S, Khan MU, Zhang ZY, Lin WX. Effects of consecutive monoculture of Pseudostellaria heterophylla on soil fungal community as determined by pyrosequencing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Adetunji AT, Lewu FB, Mulidzi R, Ncube B. The biological activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;17(3):794–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Piotrowska A, Palumbo G, Colombo C. Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2005;341(1–3):265–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen SL, Zhou BL, Lin SS, Li X, Xi HJ, Yin YL, Ye XL. Allelopathic effects of cinnamic acid and vanillin on soil microbes, soil enzymes activities and growth of grafted eggplants. Allelopathy J. 2011;28(1):29–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vitousek PM, Naylor R, Crews T, David MB, Drinkwater LE, Holland E, Johnes PJ, Katzenberger J, Martinelli LA, Matson PA, Nziguheba G, Ojima D, Palm CA, Robertson GP, Sanchez PA, Townsend AR, Zhang FS. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science. 2009;324(5934):1519–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Seal AN, Haig T, Pratley JE. Evaluation of putative allelochemicals in rice root exudates for their role in the suppression of arrowhead root growth. J Chem Ecol. 2004;30(8):1663–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Belz RG. Allelopathy in crop/weed interactions—an update. Pest Manag Sci. 2007;63(4):308–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Li XG, Ding CF, Hua K, Zhang TL, Zhang YN, Zhao L, Yang YR, Liu JG, Wang XX. Soil sickness of peanuts is attributable to modifications in soil microbes induced by peanut root exudates rather than to direct allelopathy. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;78:149–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hu XF, Fang QL, Li SX, Wu JG, Chen JS. Isolation and characterization of endophytic and rhizosphere bacterial antagonists of soft rot pathogen from Pinellia ternata. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;295(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu LK, Wang JY, Huang WM, Wu HM, Chen J, Yang YQ, Zhang ZY, Lin WX. Plant-microbe rhizosphere interactions mediated by Rehmannia glutinosa root exudates under consecutive monoculture. Sci Rep. 2016;5:15871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hao WY, Ren LX, Ran W, Shen QR. Allelopathic effects of root exudates from watermelon and rice plants on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Plant Soil. 2010;336(1–2):485–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wu HM, Qin XJ, Wang JY, Wu LK, Chen J, Fan JK, Zheng L, Tangtai HP, Arafat Y, Lin WW, Luo XM, Lin S, Lin WX. Rhizosphere responses to environmental conditions in Radix pseudostellariae under continuous monoculture regimes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2019;270:19–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Panhwar QA, Naher UA, Shamshuddin J, Othman R, Latif MA, Ismail MR. Biochemical and molecular characterization of potential phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in acid sulfate soils and their beneficial effects on rice growth. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e97241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Guan FL, Tao YY, Li H, Zhao NX. The phenotypic characteristics of a nitrogen fixing bacteria-Burkholderia Gladioli. Acta Acad Med Weifang. 2016;38(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hameed A, Shahina M, Young L-S, Lai W-A, Sridhar KR, Young C-C. Bacteriostatic stimulus of meropenem on allelochemical-metabolizing Burkholderia sp. LS-044 mitigates ferulic acid autotoxicity in rice (Oryza sativa ssp. japonica cv. Tainung 71). Plant Soil. 2019;443(1):73–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Shi SN, Hou Y, Ning SX, Xu J, Liu JX, Zeng QZ. Enhanced treatment performance of phenol wastewater by electricity-assisted Burkholderia sp. ssn-2 and its enhanced mechanism. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Willison JC. Isolation and characterization of a novel sphingomonad capable of growth with chrysene as sole carbon and energy source. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;241(2):143–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Asaf S, Numan M, Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A. Sphingomonas: from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020;40(3):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhao Q, Yue SJ, Bilal M, Hu HB, Wang W, Zhang XH. Comparative genomic analysis of 26 Sphingomonas and Sphingobium strains: dissemination of bioremediation capabilities, biodegradation potential and horizontal gene transfer. Sci Total Environ. 2017;609:1238–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Martins D, English AM. Catalase activity is stimulated by H(2)O(2) in rich culture medium and is required for H(2)O(2) resistance and adaptation in yeast. Redox Biol. 2014;2(1):308–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin XG. Principles and methods of soil microbiology research. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wray LV, Ferson AE, Fisher SH. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis ureABC operon is controlled by multiple regulatory factors including CodY, GlnR, TnrA, and Spo0H. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(17):5494–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Minami T, Anda M, Mitsui H, Sugawara M, Minamisawa K. Metagenomic analysis revealed methylamine and ureide utilization of Soybean-associated Methylobacterium. Microbes Environ. 2016;31(3):268–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Xuan BB, Guo JH, Wang AG, Mou WJ, Dai HX, Yan D, Cai XJ, Xi JQ, Xue CQ, Zhou HP, Zhang YL, Hu LW, Song JZ. Metagenomic sequencing analysis of cinnamon soil with high urease activity and identification of urease genes from microbe. Tob Sci Technol. 2019;52(11):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science. 2000;290(5491):521–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang PH, Yu XY, Weng LX, Sun LL, Zhang YL. Degradation of ferulic acid by the endophytic fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides TMTM-13 associated with Ostrya rehderiana Chun. ACS Omega. 2019;4(25):21000–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Buraimoh OM, Ilori MO, Amund OO, Isanbor C, Michel FC. The degradation of coniferyl alcohol and the complementary production of chlorogenic acids in the growth culture of Streptomyces albogriseolus KF977548 isolated from decaying wood residues. Process Biochem. 2017;52:22–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang JX, Liang JD, Gao S. Biodegradation of lignin monomers vanillic, p-coumaric, and syringic acid by the bacterial strain, Sphingobacterium sp. HY-H. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75:1156–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Xu-Xu QF, Liu QQ, Zhang X, You SL. Copper-catalyzed ring opening of benzofurans and enantioselective hydroamination cascade. Angew Chem. 2018;57(46):15204–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang K, Jiang CH, Zhang ZM, Han CY, Wang XW, Li YP, Chen KT, Zhao JF. Cut and sew: benzofuran-ring-opening enabled cyclopentenone ring formation. Chem Commun. 2020;56(84):12817–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Li YP, Zhang M, Yuan M, Chen JY, Deng ZK, Yang SH, Chen WH, Chen WF. Influence of combination of rhizobia and compound growth-promoting bacteria on the nodulation and growth of Soybean. Soybean Sci. 2017;36(4):583–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the CAS key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province for providing the lab platform.

Funding

This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program of China (2019YJ0012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CAS Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Yuan Zhao, Xiao–Meng Qin, Xue–Ping Tian, Tao Yang, Rong Deng & Jun Huang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yuan Zhao, Xue–Ping Tian & Rong Deng

  3. College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Xiao–Meng Qin

Authors
  1. Yuan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao–Meng Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xue–Ping Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rong Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ: investigation, methodology, software, visualization, writing—original draft. X–MQ: methodology, software, writing—review and editing. X–PT: software, visualization, writing—review and editing. TY: investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing. RD: writing—review and editing. JH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study does not involve any human, animal or endangered species.

Consent for publication

All co-authors have seen and agreed on the contents of the manuscript, and there is no financial interest to report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Qin, X., Tian, X. et al. Effects of continuous cropping of Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial communities and functional genes. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 8, 43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00243-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00243-6

Keywords